Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 05:15:03 PM

Title: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 05:15:03 PM
hi guys , i sent a email mail to skuz asking him if he thought this idea would be good and he would not delete it , but i have had no reply , so here goes
 
drop tanks

how many times have u flown in a mission with a redundant drop tank , well i have the answer , why not if we could have a explosive charge on drop tank , which is filled with napalm we could destroy soft targets ike ord or m3s or m16s at spawn , with a explosive charge on drop tanks it will give another part of ord , in which we have not looked at before , al good critism would be good but i think im on a winner here  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: MK-84 on February 02, 2012, 05:26:03 PM
I really hope you get banned from the forums.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Seanaldinho on February 02, 2012, 05:29:23 PM
Why? I want my drop tanks to hold gas not napalm and thats what bombs are for?
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: 4Prop on February 02, 2012, 05:29:28 PM
how are you not banned yet.

reported yet again
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: OOZ662 on February 02, 2012, 05:30:25 PM
Drop tanks were filled with fuel, not napalm. They also weren't set to explode, as tha'd make a pilot slightly uncomfortable.
Might as well ask to add laser beams and cloaking technology.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 05:33:48 PM
but they could be instead of fuel once in hanger , you have choice to either have drop tank with fuel or napakm on centre point , a lot of mission organisers put drop tanks on where they r not needed , with this option they wil be used for killing stuff including prop4 who h8s me  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: OOZ662 on February 02, 2012, 05:34:38 PM
Could, but weren't.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Seanaldinho on February 02, 2012, 05:36:58 PM
but they could be instead of fuel once in hanger , you have choice to either have drop tank with fuel or napakm on centre point , a lot of mission organisers put drop tanks on where they r not needed , with this option they wil be used for killing stuff including prop4 who h8s me  :salute

They put them on there so that once you punch the tanks you have enough fuel to rtb if needed and so that when you show up in a turn fight you dont have all the weight of 100% fuel.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 05:37:14 PM
but they could be instead of fuel once in hanger , you have choice to either have drop tank with fuel or napakm on centre point , a lot of mission organisers put drop tanks on where they r not needed , with this option they wil be used for killing stuff including prop4 who h8s me  :salute

The game doesn't model fire damage which would make napalm useless.

Drop tanks were filled with fuel, not napalm. They also weren't set to explode, as tha'd make a pilot slightly uncomfortable.
Might as well ask to add laser beams and cloaking technology.

In Bud Anderson's biography, he mentions a flight he and Yeager were on and grew bored.  So they dropped their drop tanks on the deck and turned around and strafed the drop tanks to see them blow up.

ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: USRanger on February 02, 2012, 05:38:25 PM
(http://files.automotiveforums.com/uploads/679027bobs-stupid.jpg)
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: AWwrgwy on February 02, 2012, 05:38:41 PM
(http://www.picturescream.com/images/tumblrlbixbxqdpk1qe0.gif)




wrongway
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 05:40:00 PM
thats why i emailed skuz , to see if he thought it would be ok , but he hasnt replyed yet , it maybe a good idea see what happens in bb , take no notivce of prop 4 he h8s me he is always saying my ideas are rubbish i , dont see any of his ideas on here, he may be my best freind in the real world , but im impartial and straight of duck over the waters back  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: shiv on February 02, 2012, 05:40:35 PM
+1
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Noir on February 02, 2012, 05:41:58 PM
yay one more :banana:
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 05:43:40 PM
thats wot i was thinking ack u must admit nobody has thought of it b4 , u can imagine the damage if u dropped one of these on vh 1 on v base with a load of m16s there , good night nurse (bang} 5 kills  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: PFactorDave on February 02, 2012, 05:44:59 PM
+1

You trouble maker.   :rofl
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Raphael on February 02, 2012, 05:46:27 PM
...why not if we could have a explosive charge on drop tank ...

(http://images.memegenerator.net/instances/500x/9626833.jpg)
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: BowHTR on February 02, 2012, 05:48:05 PM
hi guys , i sent a email mail to skuz asking him if he thought this idea would be good and he would not delete it , but i have had no reply , so here goes
 
drop tanks

how many times have u flown in a mission with a redundant drop tank , well i have the answer , why not if we could have a explosive charge on drop tank , which is filled with napalm we could destroy soft targets ike ord or m3s or m16s at spawn , with a explosive charge on drop tanks it will give another part of ord , in which we have not looked at before , al good critism would be good but i think im on a winner here  :salute

What is we put fuel in bombs to make them look like bombs but they're really drop tanks? Why dont we just make bombs drop tanks and drop tanks bombs? :banana: :banana: :banana:
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 05:48:49 PM
[see all the guys are starting to see the idea now/i] and i cany understand y u keep reporting me because of my active ideas ,  i know some of u may be jealouse because ive become a nickel member , but im proud skuz thought i was good enoufgh for promotion , so all you who are negative get a grip , and thank you guys to all who support me long live htc :salute :salute :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Noir on February 02, 2012, 05:50:36 PM
hahahaha this is too much  :rofl
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 05:52:53 PM
wots to much noir , are they giving u trouble also ?? report them to skuz i do , do u reckon its a whiz of a idea or not  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Raphael on February 02, 2012, 05:53:41 PM
...drop tank , which is filled with napalm ...
(http://www.wtfux.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/24c47_129184545532832331.jpg)
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: W7LPNRICK on February 02, 2012, 05:54:17 PM
I really hate to agree with people on here, especially when they're being smart-arses, butt, I'm afraid....

(http://image.wetpaint.com/image/1/I_qfW-xZU39JAY2F-WRG2Q35366/GW600H480)
Rats, we missed the end of the world...
(http://image.wetpaint.com/image/1/-4MvinKeR3LsiKChS4OYLA29511/GW268H320)
(http://image.wetpaint.com/image/1/Ar-dKWUftHBc5z4rR9Q2ag16555/GW190H198)

 :bolt:
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Noir on February 02, 2012, 05:56:19 PM
david mate, this game is somehow a simulation of what happened then, and back then they didn't have napalm in drop tanks instead of fuel. They needed their drop tank.

btw I'm french and somehow my posts are better written than yours
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 05:56:47 PM
wot does that mean /??? , i reckon if we had napalm we could drop the tanks on map room as troops were close , and it would kill all of them instead of straffing , u gotta admit its a good idea surely  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: 4Prop on February 02, 2012, 05:58:10 PM
thats why i emailed skuz , to see if he thought it would be ok , but he hasnt replyed yet , it maybe a good idea see what happens in bb , take no notivce of prop 4 he h8s me he is always saying my ideas are rubbish i , dont see any of his ideas on here, he may be my best freind in the real world , but im impartial and straight of duck over the waters back  :salute

thats because im not spamming the forums. everyone thinks your ideas are rubbish. look at my post about the Fairey Firefly..at least i know what im doing when i post. this isnt Facebook where you post everything you are doing and your friends just put up with it.

you are like the retard that works at walmart. they give you a shirt that says "how may I help you" but no one wants your help.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: 4Prop on February 02, 2012, 05:59:30 PM
wot does that mean /??? , i reckon if we had napalm we could drop the tanks on map room as troops were close , and it would kill all of them instead of straffing , u gotta admit its a good idea surely  :salute

napalm wasnt used in WW2. therefore this will never happen. let it stop here
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 06:00:32 PM
they did it was used in japan ww2, it was the begining of the new beging of drop tank use , i thought of agent orange , to get rid of the trees aproaching town , but that was only used in vietnam  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Raphael on February 02, 2012, 06:01:17 PM
you are right, we are jealous because you are a nickle member ): my apologies in the name of the community, please keep on your high geniality.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 06:06:02 PM
it was used in ww2 and i dont work at wall mart any more , i bet u do , mr shelf stacker , and the fairy firefy is rubbish also  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Raphael on February 02, 2012, 06:10:55 PM
what's the problem of working in wallmart? oh great geniality please enlighten me and explain what is wrong with that.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: mbailey on February 02, 2012, 06:12:13 PM
napalm wasnt used in WW2. 

Yes it was
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: AKP on February 02, 2012, 06:16:35 PM
 :rofl :rofl :rofl Oh Good God Almighty... I cant stop laughing.   :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: mtnman on February 02, 2012, 06:20:28 PM
I'm not so sure about the napalm in the drop tank idea, because I don't know if that would cause enough damage to actually kill a troop?

However, I could see it being a good idea to model sand on the ground, so that we could fly by and blow sand in the troopers eyes, therefore preventing them from finding the map room.  Then we could rig nets on the back of the jeeps and round all the enemy troops up, and put them to work patching bomb craters on the runway and clearing hornet nests out of the hangers.  I hate the hornets.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Raphael on February 02, 2012, 06:24:57 PM
 at the same time he wants to put explosives and napalm in a drop tank and says that fairey firefly is a silly idea. I mean... seriously?
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: jimbo71 on February 02, 2012, 06:25:25 PM
(http://troll.me/images/spider-man/this-thread-sucks.jpg)
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: oakranger on February 02, 2012, 06:26:46 PM
I'm not so sure about the napalm in the drop tank idea, because I don't know if that would cause enough damage to actually kill a troop?

However, I could see it being a good idea to model sand on the ground, so that we could fly by and blow sand in the troopers eyes, therefore preventing them from finding the map room.  Then we could rig nets on the back of the jeeps and round all the enemy troops up, and put them to work patching bomb craters on the runway and clearing hornet nests out of the hangers.  I hate the hornets.

 :rofl
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 06:28:04 PM
thank u mr baily i  have done the research , and i agree it could stop troops entering map room , especialy in town where u have 6 or 7 m3s , and 2 or 3 fighters left , itll be good to hit the fuel tanks to stop the attack as fuel tanks are just a dormant target , the napam could be incorparated within storage in the tanks on bases instead of ord , if u destroy all of fuel tanks u never get neg fuel at base , only 10 per cent  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: mthrockmor on February 02, 2012, 06:29:36 PM
The idea is weak but...

I have seen film of F4Us(?) dropping explosives that sure seemed to burn like napalm. The video is one of those canned films that seems to show up on every WW2 commercial. Was that not napalm or the early version of it? What is also interesting is one of the F4Us(?) has gear down, obvious airbrakes.

Can anyone else verify this? Am I mistaken about this being some form of napalm? If it was, should at least the F4Us have that as a weapons option? It would be a bit of programming but having the ability to burn the town down with mutiple napalm hits would change the dynamics some.

Does anyone have a definitive answer to this?

Boo
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 06:30:25 PM
and if all fails well pelt them with walmart tins of baked beans , in which i can supply free of charge  :x
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: oakranger on February 02, 2012, 06:31:22 PM

In Bud Anderson's biography, he mentions a flight he and Yeager were on and grew bored.  So they dropped their drop tanks on the deck and turned around and strafed the drop tanks to see them blow up.

ack-ack

I am going to ask, what was the result?
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 06:32:45 PM
it was def napalm , look it up which i did as im a nickel member i think its my duty to get all the info that is available  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Butcher on February 02, 2012, 06:33:20 PM
Seriously when is Skuzzy simply going to ban the trolling? This is a blatant as possibly can be. I can understand one or two wishful ideas from a credible source, but after seeing the last 50 from david its nothing more then childish trolling the board.

Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 06:35:32 PM
anyway guys good luck on the idea , hope u tell skuz its good , cus he prob thinks im not reasearching and im daft as a brush goodnight comrades in arms  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: oakranger on February 02, 2012, 06:35:58 PM
The idea is weak but...

I have seen film of F4Us(?) dropping explosives that sure seemed to burn like napalm. The video is one of those canned films that seems to show up on every WW2 commercial. Was that not napalm or the early version of it? What is also interesting is one of the F4Us(?) has gear down, obvious airbrakes.

Can anyone else verify this? Am I mistaken about this being some form of napalm? If it was, should at least the F4Us have that as a weapons option? It would be a bit of programming but having the ability to burn the town down with mutiple napalm hits would change the dynamics some.

Does anyone have a definitive answer to this?

Boo

Would you be talking about them flying level and dropping on the hillside? If so, they are just taking off and immediately right over the front line. However, I cannot recall if that was an F4U, F4F, or F6F.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 02, 2012, 06:37:37 PM
didnt like that remark butcher , im one the ones who has active brain cells unlike u sir  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: DaCoon on February 02, 2012, 06:39:07 PM
no snappy comments.... just IN
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Soulyss on February 02, 2012, 06:43:24 PM
I am going to ask, what was the result?

According to Anderson, they used up most if not all their ammo and couldn't get the things to burn.  Yeager apparently thinks the story is better if they did and tells it that way. :)

The interesting foot note to the story is they did this on their last mission before going home.  They signed up as spares for the mission and when no one aborted the mission they were joy riding instead of turning for home, the incident with the drop tanks actually happened in Switzerland.  When they got back home, they were the last ones back and everyone crowded around to see how many kills they got that day.  Turns out while they were joy riding the group got into one of it's biggest scrapes of the war, claiming over 50 victories.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: oakranger on February 02, 2012, 06:47:15 PM
According to Anderson, they used up most if not all their ammo and couldn't get the things to burn.  Yeager apparently thinks the story is better if they did and tells it that way. :)

The interesting foot note to the story is they did this on their last mission before going home.  They signed up as spares for the mission and when no one aborted the mission they were joy riding instead of turning for home, the incident with the drop tanks actually happened in Switzerland.  When they got back home, they were the last ones back and everyone crowded around to see how many kills they got that day.  Turns out while they were joy riding the group got into one of it's biggest scrapes of the war, claiming over 50 victories.

:rofl. What did they told everybody?
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: 4Prop on February 02, 2012, 06:51:41 PM
Yes it was

records I've seen show it wasnt used til late '46
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: 4Prop on February 02, 2012, 06:53:28 PM
it was used in ww2 and i dont work at wall mart any more , i bet u do , mr shelf stacker , and the fairy firefy is rubbish also  :salute

one I've never worked at walmart, 2 I can spell it right.

the firefly..spelt firefly, might not be your favorite plane but at least its a valid wish
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 06:55:14 PM
napalm wasnt used in WW2. therefore this will never happen. let it stop here

Napalm was most certainly used in WW2.  Do a little research yourself sometime. 

ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: 4Prop on February 02, 2012, 06:58:42 PM
Napalm was most certainly used in WW2.  Do a little research yourself sometime. 

ack-ack

sorry, I still have a job that needs to be done every day. Research is the last thing I think about when I have time. The little bit of research I tried looking into napalm, I didnt see it being used til late '46. sorry for not sitting here and learning when napalm was used.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 06:58:50 PM

I have seen film of F4Us(?) dropping explosives that sure seemed to burn like napalm. The video is one of those canned films that seems to show up on every WW2 commercial. Was that not napalm or the early version of it? What is also interesting is one of the F4Us(?) has gear down, obvious airbrakes.


I believe that was footage from Okinawa in which the Corsair pilots were taking off so close to the battle lines that they didn't have time to raise their gears before they dropped their napalm.

ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 06:59:44 PM
I am going to ask, what was the result?

Think they made a lot of holes in the drop tanks.

ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Plazus on February 02, 2012, 07:01:35 PM
sorry, I still have a job that needs to be done every day. Research is the last thing I think about when I have time. The little bit of research I tried looking into napalm, I didnt see it being used til late '46. sorry for not sitting here and learning when napalm was used.

Oh so you have enough time to participate in a forum discussion, but not enough time for a casual research? Oh my, is that shocking!
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 07:02:01 PM
records I've seen show it wasnt used til late '46

Thats why Wiki isn't the best source.


ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Stoliman on February 02, 2012, 07:03:24 PM
I'm sorry.  At this point, I have to agree with others that this is a troll.  Between this thread and the other(s) like his virus problem.....well.....no one moderately conversant in English is that stupid.  Welsh, he may be....but he would know punctuation.  At least a period.  I fear we have been played.

That, or I fear for the UK public education system (in addition to my own).
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: BowHTR on February 02, 2012, 07:07:30 PM
Thats why Wiki isn't the best source.


ack-ack

i think wiki said it was first used in a bomb role in 1944 when it was dropped from P38's. I may be wrong tho.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Tupac on February 02, 2012, 07:08:07 PM
didnt like that remark butcher , im one the ones who has active brain cells unlike u sir  :salute

2 active brain cells hardly warrants a plural use of the word "cell(s)"

One that tells you to breathe and the other one that tells you to post silly things on the internet doesn't do much for bragging rights.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: wil3ur on February 02, 2012, 07:08:12 PM
You all may have been trolled, I'm in deep thought contemplating how different the game would be with morse code and flyINg wings...   :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Banana on February 02, 2012, 07:08:38 PM
hi guys , i sent a email mail to skuz asking him if he thought this idea would be good and he would not delete it , but i have had no reply , so here goes
 
drop tanks

how many times have u flown in a mission with a redundant drop tank , well i have the answer , why not if we could have a explosive charge on drop tank , which is filled with napalm we could destroy soft targets ike ord or m3s or m16s at spawn , with a explosive charge on drop tanks it will give another part of ord , in which we have not looked at before , al good critism would be good but i think im on a winner here  :salute

Top Gun invite sent  :salute:banana:
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: BowHTR on February 02, 2012, 07:09:25 PM
From Wiki:

Quote
On July 17, 1944, napalm incendiary bombs were dropped for the first time by 14 American P-38 Lightning aircraft of the 402d Fighter Squadron / 370th Fighter Group on a fuel depot at Coutances, near St. Lô, France.[7] Further use of napalm by American forces occurred in the Pacific Theater of Operations, where in 1944 and 1945, napalm was used as a tactical weapon against Japanese bunkers, pillboxes, tunnels, and other fortifications, especially on Saipan, Iwo Jima, the Philippines, and Okinawa, where deeply dug-in Japanese troops refused to surrender. Napalm bombs were dropped by aviators of the U.S. Navy, the United States Army Air Forces, and the U.S. Marine Corps in support of their ground troops.[8]
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Butcher on February 02, 2012, 07:10:52 PM
sorry, I still have a job that needs to be done every day. Research is the last thing I think about when I have time. The little bit of research I tried looking into napalm, I didnt see it being used til late '46. sorry for not sitting here and learning when napalm was used.

You could simply ask the questions that some who do research (like me) to get the facts right, rather then just pull something out or use wikipedia.

Otherwise we'd have people checking wikipedia and instead of Napalm we'd be getting nuke bombs.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: DMGOD on February 02, 2012, 07:24:32 PM
<S> Davidwales You sir are a genius. The Forums need more fine men just like you, and congrats on ur promotion to nickle member status  :aok  :salute     :cheers:
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 07:26:50 PM
<S> Davidwales You sir are a genius. The Forums need you and congrats on ur promotion to nickle member status  :aok  :salute     :cheers:

I think we should encourage him to reach for Plutonium status.

ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Melvin on February 02, 2012, 07:30:02 PM
I think we should encourage him to reach for Plutonium status.

ack-ack

Hurrah Sir!


Way to go Davey 'ol boy! Welcome home!

 :aok
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: uptown on February 02, 2012, 07:40:23 PM
hi guys , i sent a email mail to skuz asking him if he thought this idea would be good and he would not delete it , but i have had no reply .......

maybe ur on his ignore list?

.........  hope u tell skuz its good , cus he prob thinks im not reasearching and im daft as a brush.............

ya reckon?
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: uptown on February 02, 2012, 07:46:07 PM
I think we should encourage him to reach for Plutonium status.

ack-ack
:furious
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Raphael on February 02, 2012, 07:46:44 PM
I this this is a true achievment, he must have been trained in 4chan or something.

but if this is natural talent he really should consider teaching this incridible art of trollage he has achieved so many levels in so many different aspects, it is just amazing.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: guncrasher on February 02, 2012, 07:52:16 PM
I believe that was footage from Okinawa in which the Corsair pilots were taking off so close to the battle lines that they didn't have time to raise their gears before they dropped their napalm.

ack-ack

they dropped 1 canister with napalm and a he bomb.  the bomb made the napalm napalm.


semp
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: infowars on February 02, 2012, 07:53:40 PM
I think you should continue to post your ideas here.

You're right some guys are just jealous.  The don't listen to them.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Tank-Ace on February 02, 2012, 07:55:17 PM
Holy crap, I haven't seen an idea this dumb since someone asked for CoD-style perk mods for AH.

David, get it through your stupid head! IF IT DIDN'T SEE ACTION IN WWII, there is almost 0% CHANCE of it being added, EVEN IT WERE A GOOD IDEA (none of yours are).


Stop asking for fantasy crap that wasn't used in combat, saw combat after WWII, or anything that had fewer than 40 produced. Basicly, if you think of it, and think its a good idea, DON'T post it, because its not a good idea.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: dunnrite on February 02, 2012, 07:56:39 PM
You're not any better, Nemesis
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: bangsbox on February 02, 2012, 08:03:09 PM
I think we should encourage him to reach for Plutonium status.

ack-ack

he will be there by next month lol god save us all or at least the queen
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Raptor05121 on February 02, 2012, 08:04:02 PM
im lol'ing because this is probably dallas or someone screwing with you guys
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: titanic3 on February 02, 2012, 08:05:34 PM
David, are you nekked?
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Tank-Ace on February 02, 2012, 08:07:29 PM
You're not any better, Nemesis

I assume you're talking to me. In rebuttle, I challenge you to show where, after I swore off being a squeaker,  I have requested anything even a fraction as stupid. I admit I haven't always been perfect, but since that, I haven't done anything worse than be inconvinent to TopBums.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: OOZ662 on February 02, 2012, 08:07:46 PM
In Bud Anderson's biography, he mentions a flight he and Yeager were on and grew bored.  So they dropped their drop tanks on the deck and turned around and strafed the drop tanks to see them blow up.

Not sure why you quoted me for that one...sure, they can catch fire, but they're just as much set to catch fire as any automobile fuel tank, as any driver will be just as upset at having their car rigged to explode as a pilot. :D
And, that's one of the few books I actually have read. Got it cheap from our Library clearance, one of my favorites.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: dunnrite on February 02, 2012, 08:11:08 PM
I assume you're talking to me. In rebuttle, I challenge you to show where, after I swore off being a squeaker,  I have requested anything even a fraction as stupid. I admit I haven't always been perfect, but since that, I haven't done anything worse than be inconvinent to TopBums.

Challenge denied.  I just don't like you.  And, you're still an annoying squeaker.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: RealDeal on February 02, 2012, 08:12:53 PM
thats wot i was thinking ack u must admit nobody has thought of it b4 , u can imagine the damage if u dropped one of these on vh 1 on v base with a load of m16s there , good night nurse (bang} 5 kills  :salute

Thats not true at all. Lots of guys have thought about having the ability to drop tanks and explode them by shooting them. I always thought it would be cool to kill troops running to the map room that way or essentially engulfing the map room with exploded drop tanks to protect it.

Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: MAINER on February 02, 2012, 08:14:51 PM
David all of your ideas are stupid.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Tank-Ace on February 02, 2012, 08:16:15 PM
Challenge denied.  I just don't like you.  And, you're still an annoying squeaker.

In other words, you can't. I REALLY don't care if you don't like me. You're some faceless troll on the internet, that odds are I've never interacted with before, have never met, and never will meet.

You don't like me, then add me to your ignore list..... but don't come out accusing me of stuff you can't back up, you little twit.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 08:17:02 PM
they dropped 1 canister with napalm and a he bomb.  the bomb made the napalm napalm.


semp

Wrong, they didn't drop a bomb to ignite teh napalm canister.  It had its own ignition source that would cause the napalm canister to break and explode on impact.

ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 08:19:18 PM
Holy crap, I haven't seen an idea this dumb since someone asked for CoD-style perk mods for AH.

Quite a few of your wishes on the wishlist pegged the retard meter.  Didn't HiTech even call you a little brat in one of your wishlist threads?  You know, the one where you were crying about how tough it was to attack B-17s and you wanted it to be made easier?  That one set a record on the 'tard meter for awhile.


ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: dunnrite on February 02, 2012, 08:21:44 PM
In other words, you can't. I REALLY don't care if you don't like me. You're some faceless troll on the internet, that odds are I've never interacted with before, have never met, and never will meet.

You don't like me, then add me to your ignore list..... but don't come out accusing me of stuff you can't back up, you little twit.

I never accused you of anything more than being just as stupid as davidwales, handsomehunk.  My ignore list is empty, and it will stay that way.  When I have a bad day, I look forward to seeing idiots proving their handsomehunkery on these boards.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Tank-Ace on February 02, 2012, 08:22:47 PM
Quite a few of your wishes on the wishlist pegged the retard meter.  Didn't HiTech even call you a little brat in one of your wishlist threads?  You know, the one where you were crying about how tough it was to attack B-17s and you wanted it to be made easier?  That one set a record on the 'tard meter for awhile.

ack-ack

A while back, I admit. But I don't think even a sizable portion of those even matched this.

I mean hes actually suggesting we give the power to bind and to loose to a group of players.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: SPKmes on February 02, 2012, 08:25:10 PM
(http://legacy-cdn.smosh.com/smosh-pit/112010/main-troll.jpg)
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: oakranger on February 02, 2012, 08:25:52 PM
A few of you people need to go to FW forum.  You will fit right in.  
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Tank-Ace on February 02, 2012, 08:28:23 PM
I never accused you of anything more than being just as stupid as davidwales, handsomehunk.  My ignore list is empty, and it will stay that way.  When I have a bad day, I look forward to seeing idiots proving their handsomehunkery on these boards.

So I'm just as stupid as he is, and you're BS right here doesn't make you guilty of the same  :huh? Quiet doesn't mean smart, and voluble doesn't mean stupid, which is the impression you seem to be under. As I've said, I haven't done anything even nearly as stupid on this BBS account. Infact, its possible I've actually given good response to more real questions than you have.


Am I saying I never was as dumb as david? No, I'm not. But you are saying I'm as dumb as I used to be which is both unsupported by any evidence, and just kind of a dick move.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 08:31:35 PM
A few of you people need to go to FW forum.  You will fit right in.  

You are a mean, mean man inviting these little lambs to the slaughter house that is FW.  They wouldn't survive a minute with their virtue intact.

ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Butcher on February 02, 2012, 08:35:42 PM
This thread certainly went nuclear. How long has it been since Tank-Ace or Davidwales asked for the Nuke?

/It served in ww2 says wikipedia

//Wiki also says Tie Fighters dropped them
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: oakranger on February 02, 2012, 08:47:03 PM
You are a mean, mean man inviting these little lambs to the slaughter house that is FW.  They wouldn't survive a minute with their virtue intact.

ack-ack

You guys need somebody to replace peepee.   :D
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: MK-84 on February 02, 2012, 08:49:31 PM
This thread certainly went nuclear. How long has it been since Tank-Ace or Davidwales asked for the Nuke?

/It served in ww2 says wikipedia

//Wiki also says Tie Fighters dropped them

For everyone that wants a nuke, here is the definitive information you need to make an educated, intelligent and proper wishlist post.
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Nuke
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 08:52:06 PM
You guys need somebody to replace peepee.   :D

I'm sure we can get SigSauer to fill in for him, I mean he's already filling in for him here.

Oh...did I let the cat out of the bag that SigSauer is Pieper/Ferb?  Darn.

ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: coombz on February 02, 2012, 08:57:49 PM
I assume you're talking to me. In rebuttle

:rofl nice

how can a native English speaker write such gibberish all the time ON A FORUM WITH A SPELL CHECK BUILT IN

do your parents a favour and kill yourself 

Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: oakranger on February 02, 2012, 09:04:19 PM

Oh...did I let the cat out of the bag that SigSauer is Pieper/Ferb?  Darn.

ack-ack

 :rofl

How did you guess it was him? Was he campaign for a bloody revolution on the government again?
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Hawk78th on February 02, 2012, 09:08:15 PM
"Light travels faster than sound. That's why some people appear bright until you hear them speak."


  :huh
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: MK-84 on February 02, 2012, 09:08:33 PM

:rofl nice

how can a native English speaker write such gibberish all the time ON A FORUM WITH A SPELL CHECK BUILT IN

do your parents a favour and kill yourself 



Other than that being rather inappropriate...

I have a link for that too :uhoh

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Suicide

Disclaimer:  MK-84 does not agree or disagree with the content from that link, and any opinion expressed does not necessarily coincide with his beliefs.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Rino on February 02, 2012, 10:05:57 PM
records I've seen show it wasnt used til late '46

      Found an ineresting Youtube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Baa5yMdiIpg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Baa5yMdiIpg)

    And the Corsair at Okinawa:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ6GlrE5SBg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ6GlrE5SBg)
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Rob52240 on February 02, 2012, 10:27:05 PM
I asked for napalm last year.  I'm sure about a thousand guys asked for it before I did.  I was told no napalm because the town is european with masonry structures and not japanese with wooden buildings.

No Napalm, No batbombs, No hedge chopping, no anti tank infantry, no extra advantages will be given to this group or disadvantages to another group, no morse code, no ham radios, no e6b after you bail out.

Why don't you just code your own game and find some investors to fund the development?  You can make it any way you wish.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: coombz on February 02, 2012, 10:33:22 PM
Other than that being rather inappropriate...

I have a link for that too :uhoh

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Suicide

Disclaimer:  MK-84 does not agree or disagree with the content from that link, and any opinion expressed does not necessarily coincide with his beliefs.

remember kids, it's down the road, not across the street

Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: LCADolby on February 02, 2012, 10:46:27 PM
(http://www.funnyforumpics.com/forums/this-thread-sucks/10/Thread-Crap-Stupid-Actors.jpg)
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 02, 2012, 10:48:11 PM
I asked for napalm last year.  I'm sure about a thousand guys asked for it before I did.  I was told no napalm because the town is european with masonry structures and not japanese with wooden buildings.


I don't know who told you the reason for no napalm was because the towns are modeled after European villages and the building are built out of masonry.  Most of the napalm dropped in the PTO was against fortified Japanese positions to burn them out, same with the use of napalm in the ETO along the Siegfied Line against heavy German fortifications.

The main reason we do not have napalm in game is that it would also entail creating a damage model for fire, which we do not have.  I wish fire damage would get modeled sometime so we can have napalm, would be great against ground vehicles.

ack-ack
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Rondar on February 03, 2012, 12:17:22 AM
Yes, and it would be cool to sling a napalm bomb along a runway and burn planes taking off
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Changeup on February 03, 2012, 12:36:19 AM
DavidWales your ideas ROCK!  Don't let these guys deter you from your finest troll!! 

YOU ARE

(http://i909.photobucket.com/albums/ac300/Changeup1/demotivational-poster-10123.jpg)
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Butcher on February 03, 2012, 02:36:55 AM
I don't know who told you the reason for no napalm was because the towns are modeled after European villages and the building are built out of masonry.  Most of the napalm dropped in the PTO was against fortified Japanese positions to burn them out, same with the use of napalm in the ETO along the Siegfied Line against heavy German fortifications.

The main reason we do not have napalm in game is that it would also entail creating a damage model for fire, which we do not have.  I wish fire damage would get modeled sometime so we can have napalm, would be great against ground vehicles.

ack-ack


Ack-Ack you have to be reasonable here, a devils brigade member only notices a town once he starts his 15k dive onto town before picking one of the buildings out to practice the kamikaze tradition. A warriors spirit doesn't care how nicely detailed a town can be, only how fast one go down with the most amount of kamikazes with the least opposition.

Its tough to see scenery when you are trying to break mach 1 into a building/hanger.



Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Bruv119 on February 03, 2012, 02:42:54 AM
david wales for PM! 
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Noir on February 03, 2012, 03:03:02 AM
david wales for PM!  

what you want him to PM you?
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: MachFly on February 03, 2012, 03:56:59 AM
what you want him to PM you?

 :rofl

I think he means prime minister.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: bangsbox on February 03, 2012, 04:20:48 AM
:rofl

I think he means prime minister.
Prime minister!!!! he earned it...most post in a month EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ans its his first month. he knows more then anyone ever so he doesnt need to read other post with any thought, his own have way to much brilliance to care about weak minded folk
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: FLS on February 03, 2012, 04:31:11 AM
If you loaded your guns with troops you could shoot them into the map room.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: VonMessa on February 03, 2012, 05:48:59 AM
Prime minister!!!! he earned it...most post in a month EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ans its his first month. he knows more then anyone ever so he doesnt need to read other post with any thought, his own have way to much brilliance to care about weak minded folk

If you can't bedazzle them with your brilliance, befuddle them with your bullchit  :aok
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Hawk55 on February 03, 2012, 06:04:33 AM
I think we should encourage him to reach for Plutonium status.

ack-ack

Rumor has it that the more you email Skuzzy, the quicker you reach this status.   :bolt:
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: dirtdart on February 03, 2012, 06:12:52 AM
INdeed
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 03, 2012, 06:27:17 AM
he only replys now and again hes like the scarlet pimpernel ive emailed him loads of times , i asked him if he could help me fix my pc , but he said he cant , ive been looking how you lot argue of the slightest thing , any way when i got home tonight ill have my pc fixed , so ill be on late war , thanks for the interest in my posts , i have got a few more , which none of you have thought of before , so if you want ill post them when i got some spare time as they are a bit in depth and i have to research all the info :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: VonMessa on February 03, 2012, 07:03:20 AM
he only replys now and again hes like the scarlet pimpernel ive emailed him loads of times , i asked him if he could help me fix my pc , but he said he cant , ive been looking how you lot argue of the slightest thing , any way when i got home tonight ill have my pc fixed , so ill be on late war , thanks for the interest in my posts , i have got a few more , which none of you have thought of before , so if you want ill post them when i got some spare time as they are a bit in depth and i have to research all the info :salute

You mean he is in France, trying to save the Dauphin from the Guillotine?

Perhaps, you are Skuzzy and DavidWales is your disguise...

That explains why HiTech has been moderating, lately...
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 03, 2012, 07:14:25 AM
no im not skuzzy , you coud be skuzzy for i know , that why you like my ideas of late , its funny every time your offline skuzzys online and visa versa , he is like the agents of the matrix , he can take anyform he wants  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: MAINER on February 03, 2012, 07:30:50 AM
Stop posting. All your posts are stupid and have no point at all.
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: AKP on February 03, 2012, 07:54:59 AM
(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l273/woosle_2006/WalePhophecy.jpg)

Seems this was foretold... if we had only listened.  :huh
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: TequilaChaser on February 03, 2012, 07:56:40 AM
thanks for the interest in my posts , i have got a few more , which none of you have thought of before , so if you want ill post them when i got some spare time as they are a bit in depth and i have to research all the info :salute

Please do one thing if you never do anything else , which is read the forum rules and make your posts  in the correct forum depending on the topic of the thread

this idea ( this thread topic  regarding napalm and drop tanks ) should have been in the wishlist forum.....

all of your "help, I've got a virus"  threads should have been in the tech forum or the software/hardware forum......


in doing the above request, of posting in the correct forums............ you will not be drawing as much unneeded grief from others...... even though you bring alot of the attention on yourself, their are some who are just simply a  holes........

TC
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: davidwales on February 03, 2012, 08:19:10 AM
yes well i did make a error sorry it shoud have gone in wish list i did apoligise earlier not doing it on purpose , any way i wont be posting many ideas as i have my pc back tonight , and some of the guys think they are good , and some think they r rubbish ive had loads of fan mail ,saying they are great ideas and that im a insperation , to new ideas , after all rome was not built in a day , but i did have a few emails with guys saying they hate me , but at the end of the day who knows ill invent a good idea , that every one wil think is the bee s knees , i have one idea that ive been thinking about that no one has ever thought of yet , and it will make every player in the game real proud , doesnt matter if they cant bomb , or cant shoot , every one will be recognised as a vital player , and give them the get up and go to get better at the game  :salute
Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: Dead Man Flying on February 03, 2012, 08:33:01 AM
sorry, I still have a job that needs to be done every day. Research is the last thing I think about when I have time. The little bit of research I tried looking into napalm, I didnt see it being used til late '46. sorry for not sitting here and learning when napalm was used.

Not having the time to properly research an esoteric topic is fine.  Lots of people don't have the time to research the history of napalm use.

However, posting authoritatively about a subject that you admittedly know almost nothing about... that's a bit over the line, don't you think?  No need to get defensive about it.

Title: Re: new topic with out consent
Post by: hitech on February 03, 2012, 08:45:00 AM
Gents, It may be better just to ignore these ideas .

Davidwales: Please don't email skuzzy you ideas. His primary job is to  help people with problems they have running the game.
Do not expect a response from us on your ideas either here or via email.

Our real response to most ideas players post would be negative. And a negative response from us would then normally cause the OP to try convince us his idea is better then purple underwear. And we do not have the time to post every time an idea is posted.

Please start using some filter process before you post your ideas. Talk to some other people you know in the game about your idea first. It may help you avoid severing up slow center of the plate pitches.

Locked due to members in fighting.

HiTech