Originally posted by O'Westy:
I'm missing your point obviously. Maybe because your burying it with unfound accusations and misinterpretatons of what I and others have said. I'm not dictating to anyone. I'm lobbying for a change in something I find to be pretty bogus. Nothing different than anyone else on any other subject they've asked HTC to look at for change. As for how or what the CT is set up for? It's irrelevant to the discussion imo. I enjoy the MA with the exception of the completely unrealistic radar. Although I would naturally also think the radar in the CT should be more like what WWII had and not something found on a patrolling JSTARS platform. If I flew there.
To give you a taste of your own medicine how about if you want HTC to model mutual death collisions that you should lobby them to change it in to the way you want in the CT and you go there?
Westy
[ 12-04-2001: Message edited by: O'Westy ]
Westy,
I did lobby for a change in collisions. I posted more than once about it. I saw no reason to continue to bring it up after I made my point clear. I didn't start multiple threads about it, as a matter of fact I didn't start a single thread about it. I just posted i an existing thread.
What have I misinterpreted in your post? In this very postI quoted you bring up the opinion you find the dar as "bogus" in the MA. You are lobbying for a change in the MA. I saw that and am lobbying against the change you want to make about the dar. Where have I misinterpreted that?
I brought up the CT as I found it already has most of the changes in dar that have been complained about. If the CT were modified to be compatible with the MA and scores (aka perks) players could swap back and forth and there would be no loss to anyone who wanted to spend time there as well as the MA. I see that as a win win situation. What is wrong with that? Hell I'd even go to the CT for a change of pace now and then.
The second reason I brought up the CT is so that you could have what you want with NO penalty in the game and those of us who like the MA dar could have what we want.
Now if you are insisting that the dar change in the MA then you are in fact trying to dictate how I play. That I will object to and have done so. I see no reason why I should not. I don't understand why you are offended about my objection unless it is simply the fact that I have a differing opinion than you that you object to.