Author Topic: Airbus 380 -- Another Concorde? (Read 4278 times)

NUKE · « **Reply #120 on:** April 24, 2005, 04:49:35 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Yes you guys sure showed us by inventing jets, rockets, radar, nuclear fission ... oh wait! You didn't!

We are stupid. We just invented the entire concept of the modern aircraft, the liquid rocket ( and gyroscopes and guidence), went to the moon (1969), have the fastest jets in the world (1964), and produced the world's first atomic bomb, the worlds first controled nuclear chain reaction....and loads more .

Sorry Gscholtz, but we have been decades ahead in technology. The Germans copied American rocket technology from the 20's

Airhead · « **Reply #121 on:** April 24, 2005, 05:18:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
ROFL! Is that why the guy that got you to the Moon was named Von Braun and used to lob rockets at London in his previous occupation? What about the scientists who worked on the Bomb? Yes old Albert was American to the bone!

Do lots of Euros share your pain it was Lance Armstrong- an American, functioning on only one testicle- who walked on the moon first?

Airhead · « **Reply #122 on:** April 24, 2005, 05:31:18 PM »

Diminish it! Qualify it! Make it less notable because you are an Amerihater!

NUKE · « **Reply #123 on:** April 24, 2005, 05:39:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
What about the scientists who worked on the Bomb? Yes old Albert was American to the bone!

Yeah, Albert was too inferior to be a German, the Jews didn't really muster up to the German ideal. America and our society are the reasons for our great success while Nazi Germany was a supreme failure.

The fact is that America went to the moon, not Germany or anyone else.

NUKE · « **Reply #124 on:** April 24, 2005, 05:57:43 PM »

It's been 36 years since America went to the moon and 44 years since Russia first put a man in space.

How many other countries have put a man into space since then? Seems like an elite club......and Germany still isn't in that club, despite their great scientists.

NUKE · « **Reply #125 on:** April 24, 2005, 06:00:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Why can't you guys be proud of your own inventions instead of claiming others for your own? Never understood that part.

who's claiming others inventions for out own?

NUKE · « **Reply #126 on:** April 24, 2005, 06:01:51 PM »

What did your country invent? I can list a lot for America if you want.

NUKE · « **Reply #127 on:** April 24, 2005, 06:17:21 PM »

Gscholtz, the only time I ever respond and defend my country is when I see someone trying to bash it in some way.... I don't try to diminish any other country's achievments or way of life, until I see somone doing that against mine.

The thing that set me off here was your statement "you really showed us by inventing, bla bla bla......

I looked at that statement and laughed thinking about what you meant by "us".

NUKE · « **Reply #128 on:** April 24, 2005, 06:20:54 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Actually the Russians (well ... again ex-German scientists) reached the Moon first. However you guys shot a man up there first.

yeah, Russian probe crashed into the moon a few years before America put men on the moon and returned them to earth. No comparison in technological achievment.

NUKE · « **Reply #129 on:** April 24, 2005, 06:41:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Ditto. Read the post I was responding to.

Did you see how old that post was?

Airhead · « **Reply #130 on:** April 24, 2005, 06:46:44 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Skis and the paperclip

Snowboards asnd Post-It Notes. O=Yea.

Skydancer · « **Reply #131 on:** April 25, 2005, 06:45:26 PM »

AAAH BEEEELEEEVE IN THAH RESERECSHUN. YYYYEAAAAS AH DO BOYZ!

DamnedRen · « **Reply #132 on:** April 25, 2005, 07:27:18 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rshubert
There was an article in FLYING magazine about that crash. It seems that NOBODY ever thought that the pilot would use full rudder under those conditions, and the FAA and EAA requirements for structural integrity don't factor it in. Ouch.

Actually it was full reversing rudder deflections not just a one time full rudder.
Here is an exert from the official NTSB report:

This aircraft experienced high lateral loads associated with reversing rudder movements during the 1997 accident.

There is quite a difference in what you said above.

Ren