Originally posted by storch
having just typed that I contend that if the nixon administration had given the pentagon carte blanche authorization to win the conflict we would have been out of there in sixty days with the whole region as a colony.
I think the Chinese and Soviets would have had something to say about that, but that's a discussion for a different thread.
Originally posted by lazs2
I guess we need to define "win".
In vietnam we controlled 90% of the hamlets in the south.. we never lost any battle in southern territory. That was how it was when we left.
In Iraq.. we control the entire country and no army opposes us. the government of the entire country wants us there to help police terrorists and no uniformed soldiers of any opposition dare to confront us in that country.
lazs
In Vietnam the Viet-Cong controlled the countryside with the government forces and US barely managing to defend the major population centers. Much like Iraq now.
The VC did not wear uniforms and resorted to ambush tactics and terrorism. Much like the insurgents in Iraq now.
The local Vietnamese population was divided in their support to the warring parties. Much like the Iraqis now.
The VC was supported both with material and fighters from neighboring countries. Much like the insurgency in Iraq now.
North Vietnam was just itching to directly intervene on the side of their likeminded in the South, and they finally did just that. Much like Iran is itching now.
China and Russia supported North Vietnam with weapons, much like they do now with Iran.