Author Topic: A quick comparison of Aces High  (Read 3587 times)

Dynamite danny

  • Guest
A quick comparison of Aces High
« on: September 29, 1999, 10:56:00 PM »
I like it a lil.  Althouh the flight model is a bit unrealistic.  AND, I think that whole RED OUT, BLACK OUT thing is a bit silly.  Over all, it is a neat game.  I cant wait to see wut they do in the final version.  

Have any of you ever played "The Battle of BrittaN"?  That is a new game comin out, and I think it looks pretty cool.  I'm one of the alpha testers for that game, and I think it is pretty fun.  If you want to see screenshots of it, go to  
 www.simguild.com

This game is certainly worth your time to look at.  Its not out yet, but you can see screenshots.  One thing that is really great about BATTLE OF BRITTAN is that there is no annoying REDOUT, or BLACKOUT.  I think that adds to the realism, seeing as I've never "Blacked out" in any of the planes I flew.  

Offline JoeMud

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 1999, 11:04:00 PM »
......You know people realy do/did black out in real life. So if ya call that silly then go play FA youll be a bit happyer sounds like they have the FM's and the gameplay your looking for there buddy.

------------------
Gijoey,Joetwo,JoeMud=me
 DHBG!!

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 1999, 11:27:00 PM »
Spend some time offline and dial in your joystick, at first I had some tunnel vision too but for the most part it`s no longer a problem. BTW- does your flying experience include high performance military fighter planes? Do a web search on the subject and you will discover some facts that may even help your "virtual flying". Remember this an early beta and will have some rough edges,give Hi-Tech and the crew a bit of time and it will be one of the best flight sims on the market-just like his previous one.  

------------------
}]


Offline Sascha JG 77

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 1999, 07:02:00 AM »
Yeah and what about that annoying "terra firma" thing? I keep crashing into it and die..not very realistic...

Sascha

roblex

  • Guest
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 1999, 07:05:00 AM »

"One thing that is really great about BATTLE OF BRITTAN is that there is no annoying REDOUT, or BLACKOUT. I think that adds to the realism,"

ROTFL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

One thing that is really great thing about Super Mario Karts is that there is none of that silly DYING or DAMAGE when you hit the wall. I think that really adds to the realism.  

Sorry,  I must not mock the afflicted. I must not mock the afflicted. I must not mock the afflicted, I must not .....

Offline Downtown

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
      • http://www.tir.com/~lkbrown1
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 1999, 07:28:00 AM »
I was watching a special on The Learning Channel or Discovery Channel.

It compared the U.S. Airforc and Russian Air Force.

The Russians were testing kids, and they had to be able to pass certain physical tests before even being considered for pilot training.

The U.S. Airforce takes engineers, and pumps oxygen to their brain.

Now what I know of engineers, the oxygen hasn't helped.

Perhaps some of our Russian Friends can inform us if lack of oxygen has helped their engineering?

Obviously Danny's oxygen supply was cut off some time ago.  Redouts and Blackouts unrealistic.

And Danny, should you reply, how did you get a job as an alpha tester for that outfit, and does it pay more than 55K a year?
------------------
"I could feel the 20MM Cannon impacting behind me so I made myself small behind the pilot armor" Charlie Bond AVG


[This message has been edited by Downtown (edited 09-30-1999).]

Offline Curly

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 1999, 08:51:00 AM »
Hey Danny Dilweed. Whats the site addy of the Bwattle of Bwitain sim newsgroup so I can spam yer lameprettythang back?

BTW. Can you hover?  

--Curly

 

[This message has been edited by Curly (edited 09-30-1999).]

oooo 111th Fighter Group

  • Guest
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 1999, 09:08:00 AM »
Danny?  Is this a fishing trip??  Be honest

------------------
Otto CO 111th Fighter Group        ziggy2@home.com          
111th Fighter Group     www.cris.com/~ziggy2/      



Papu

  • Guest
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 1999, 09:12:00 AM »
Hehe...umm Danny, the fire extinguisher is down the hall and to the right, I suggest you run  

Curly wrote:
 
Quote
Hey Danny Dilweed...

Man, You guys...No Mercy at all  
ROTFLMAO!!

Papu "Pooh" Tafao

------------------
Papu "pooh" Tafao
WB: VMF-214 "The Blacksheep" (MAG-11) www.tafao.com/vmf214


[This message has been edited by Papu (edited 09-30-1999).]

Offline Rebel

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #9 on: September 30, 1999, 09:32:00 AM »
WTF?????
I thought the "Kill the walking" thread was full of dweebs, but this takes the cake.

Annoying Blackout/Redout?

What kind of flying have you done?
Airline flying?
A cargo plane full of rubber dog toejam outta hong kong?

Get a life, and do the sim community a favor and leave.  You're obviously not cut out to play with the big boys, so head on back to the sandbox.

No blackouts....sheesh



------------------
-Rebel 487th Lil' Bastards

System:
PIII 450
160mb 100mhz SDRAM
Diamond Monster MX300 (sound)
Diamond Viper V770 TNT2 Ultra 32mb (video)
(controls follow)
TM F-22 Pro (stick)
TM F-16 TQS (throttle)
TM Elite Pedals (rudder)

"You rebel scum"

Offline phaetn

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 69
      • http://www.dogfighter.com
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #10 on: September 30, 1999, 11:16:00 AM »
Downtown wrote:
 
Quote
I was watching a special on The Learning Channel or Discovery Channel.  It compared the U.S. Airforce and Russian Air Force.

Yes, I saw that too.  The Luftwaffe have adopted the strategy, too, of testing possible AF candidates before recruiting them.  I think the show said they had to stand 5G in a centrifuge without having been given any training or utilizing breathing or muscle exercises.  If they don't pass they aren't even recruited.

The US, on the other hand, trains pilots for over a year (was it two?) before putting them to a G test.  If they G-LOCed and weren't able to cut the mustard they were tossed... or relegated to flying dog sh*t out of Hong Kong.      The West also put more emphasis on engineering (G-Suits, forced oxygen, monitors  so the plane's software can figure out the pilot's state of consciousness) whereas the former Soviet Block countries had higher pilot conditioning requirements... all a matter of cost, I guess.

Amazing that during the reunification of Germany that the West suddenly owned a squadron of MiG-29 Fulcrums.  Hello?!?!  KA-CHIIING!  How many Pentagon and Nato military brass were rubbing their hands with glee?  Probably could have started a fire from the heat alone!

Check out this article at Combatsim about blackouts: http://www.combatsim.com/htm/may99/blackout.htm

In the article the writer interviewed actual pilots who fly the F-16.  They indicated that holding 6G or 7G turns was not even an issue and they they could even hold 9Gs for quite a while with no loss of vision (the article states a test pilot held 9Gs in a centrifuge for over a minute and it was stopped by a supervising doctor, not the pilot's LOC!).  The key is preparation, proper technique and physical conditioning.  Now, these pilots have the benefit of an inclined seat in the F-16, G-suits, forced oxygen and excellent physical conditioning.  That obviously adds a lot of tolerance.

I don't mean to suggest that WWII pilots that were drafted had these sorts of benefits, but we should remember that they were trained for the purpose and should have been able to take more Gs than an unconditioned person… the minute you add breathing exercises and muscle straining it hugely bumps up tolerance.  Obviously, they didn't have the know-how that we do today and a lot of these were just kids off the street, but still, it is a factor to remember.

Dynamite Danny might be a little extreme in wishing there were no black outs or red outs (yank and bank, boy!) but I think quite a few people have indicated that the black out onsets too quickly.  This is still a very early Beta, so a lot of changes will be made: hopefully the reduction of G effects will be one of them (though I like the look of the tunnel vision very much!).

Cheers,


------------------
phaetnAT
Aces High Alpha Tester

[This message has been edited by phaetn (edited 09-30-1999).]

Offline Downtown

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
      • http://www.tir.com/~lkbrown1
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 1999, 12:37:00 PM »
Reading "Baa Baa Black Sheep" and "The Flying Tigers" as well as several of the books written by AVG Pilots.

The all said that Gregory Boyington was a hell of a Pilot.  Though everyone hated him.

He would flex his neck muscles, I think he said he blacked out once.

I would be nice if, as you went up in rank, or the longer your streak lasted, the harder it was to black/red out.

Of course we can all recall stories of Pitts pilots that could stand numerous and repeat G Forces, until they started sqeezing their brains out their nostrils.

How, and when do you model head implosion?

------------------
"I could feel the 20MM Cannon impacting behind me so I made myself small behind the pilot armor" Charlie Bond AVG

Dynamite danny

  • Guest
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #12 on: September 30, 1999, 11:13:00 PM »
Yes as a matter of fact, I flew the T34 (a jet) in the airforce.  I don't think I ever came close to blacking out.  And we pulled some serious Gs.  If you don't want to believe me, then don't.  But there it is.  I don't know how we would be able to have dogfights (though I was never in one) if we black out as often as I am seeing in these games.  However, and lord knows why, when someone else is controlling the airplane, I seam to remember getting dizzy a lot quicker.  It's just not somthing that stands out a lot in my flight experience.  Just an observation, that is all.

I thought Aces High was a nice game.  I really did.  I read over my post, and came across a few places that may have been misinterpreted.  I didn't mean to "spam" this newsgroup.  I also didn't intend to step on any toes.  Sorry if I did.  I am just a guy who really enjoys flight sims, and wanted to see if anyone else on here had flown BOB, and would be willing to trade opinions.  I sincerely apologize.  

I like Aces High.  I think it has all the features I enjoyed from WarBirds, and has enhanced the things I disliked.  The graphics are superb, I love the tracers and the moving surfaces are great too.  Im not quite confortable with the FM but I am sure that in time it will grow on me.  I'll probably pay for it when the beta is over.

Again, I apologize.  And I hope that there are no grudges.  <S>alute.

Offline SC-Sp00k

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 481
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #13 on: October 01, 1999, 12:22:00 AM »
Danny. I thought about having a laugh at your expense with the post. But it is neither constructive nor warranted. So ill simply address the comparision.

I too fly every Combat flight sim that hits the shelves or the net.  I flew Simguilds Flying Circus and the BOB Alpha test.

The BOB game is a good one. But it is nowhere on par with AH even in alpha form. Simguild is a company with a lot of promises and not a lot of anything else.
FC was a good example of this. We heard the hard luck stories of the company. We heard how this and that was going to happen cause they wanted our dollars and we paid and paid and paid.

Reality was we got nothing more than the original Beta game we flew way back when.
They claim so much will happen in BOB. new planes, exciting features etc.  yet they are already working on a 3rd game im led to believe.  FC has been left to stagnate and die on the withered sim vine. BOB is hardly in a position to compete with others of its age in its present state tho may if allowed to expand into the promised sim. But SG neither have the resources nor time to work on 2 games at once.

Its players pay for an uncomplete game which is already being superceeded by the next project. Hence the BOB guys I expect will get what the FC guys got.

SG doesnt claim to be a compny dedicated to realistic flight sim mechanics as many of us like to play. They make a damn good playable game.  But its market is small. If left to go the way of FC then BOB will be relegated to the gene pool to break headlines in 5 years time as the one that should have been but wasnt even close.

If your going to pay hard cash. Pay for the survivor. You will be much happier in the long run.

All power to SG with their sim. But they dont listen. Their customer relations outside of Lawton USA is very poor and their customer base is a declining breed.

My 0.02 cents AUS.

SC-Sp00k
Skeleton Crew

Kangaroo

  • Guest
A quick comparison of Aces High
« Reply #14 on: October 01, 1999, 03:57:00 PM »
Dynamite Danny--

Last time I looked the T34 Mentor was a single engine PROPELLER driven aircraft designed in the '40s. Want to revise your story about flying jets in the Air Force? And if you were mistaken about the model you flew (were flown in?) and really were in a jet T37, T38, you were in an inclined seat with a g-suit most likely. Makes a hell of a difference in G-LOC tolerance pal.

Reminds me of a windbag-doofus who used to work here. Claimed he flew backseater in F/A-18s in the Navy. Pointed out that F/A-18s were single-seat fighter-bombers and got the typical horsepoop backing and filling, shuck&jive.

"Were they trainers?"..."Na, man, it was a secret type, ya knows, stealth plane"..."How many engines did it have"..."Man, I cain't tell ya dat, it am a secret". He really spoke in this manner.