Ok. Now you're talking skins for aircraft/vehicles and not opening up the program for public use, nor having a player provide the whole ball of wax for modeling an aircraft. Hey. I'm all for skinning. AW has had that for over 3 years now. It's a great tool that really allows for a deeper immersion in events or when watching your films. And if folks had to paint all other aircraft pink to have an advantage,,,,well they suck so bad any how that even doing that wouldn't help them.
But. HiTech had already said, for reasons unexplained, that AH cannot allow this. Ask him why, maybe he'll give the reasons.
As for player contributions? Well. I look at it this way. AH is going to constantly move forward. Unlike EAW, Janes WWII or SDOE which are packaged, pushed out, patched and then considered history forcing players to use as is or move it along themselves. With AH I am paying for an evolving product and I like having one source (the HTC folk) to either praise in a glorious fashion for great work or squeak like a step child at for questionable modeling. It may sound real nice for WB III to have folks like Lemso build and model a Macch, it looks great, but who's flown it? Judging from the nature of the community at AGW (and it would be the same here or AW or FA) I give it three weeks before someone starts publicly whining that Lemso was too liberal with his figures and made the Macchi too good, or someone has better info with a more reliable data from some study that proves without a doubt that the Macchi FM is way off, or that iEN favours so-and-so because they will not use thier aircraft that they just took a whole six weeks to make.
Skins are one thing. But to have to use the community to bolster up a company and it's product because of layoffs and a lack of development funds is quite another.
-Westy
[This message has been edited by Westy (edited 01-04-2001).]