Author Topic: More Gun control???  (Read 5595 times)

Offline demaw1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 652
More Gun control???
« Reply #300 on: August 22, 2004, 11:50:07 PM »
Beetle.......reply....


  Really? Anachronistic in the 21st century. Seems genocide would be to,but it isnt is it. No our constitution and bill of rights are more important today then back then even.

 Please drop the raccoon and trusting a mass muderer with a 45 after he/she has done the time.It is intelligently dishonest.

 We have not,repeat,not established that armed citizens would have no effect on this goverment. What is this 6 shooter misdirection about? You have read what we have said, and to come up with 6 shooters against atomic bombs is again, intelligently dishonest.

We are not in the main talking about other gov. Rather we are talking about ours. You are right,you did not have frontiersmen. But you did have kings,knights,barons etc. , which made the common people nothing but slaves.

 Again you are right ,the British people ,and others in europe ,most but not all of the world for that matter , have no concept of ...give me liberty or give me death...Europes motto is give me life at all cost.

 To say I have no Idea, or little knowledge, of how other countries came to be, is again intelligently dishonest. I recieve knowledge of europe in the same way you recieve knowledge of america.I will put my history education up against yours any time.

I do not compare our history to yours,there simply is no comparasion. But I tell you this , if you truely believe the magna carta has no bearing on England today,and if there are enough like you , you sir will soon lose what freedom you do have. It will only take one generation, to lose all that has been gained thru bloodshed over many generations.


 Yes I do believe we have more freedom than you ,only because I believe we have more of a chance of keeping it than you do. The fact is , you can not stop your gov from doing anything it wants to when it wants to. Our gov. has to stop and think first , simply because we are armed. Does that mean it is written in stone that we would prevail? No it doesnt,but like our fore fathers I would rather die taking a few with me, than live in bondage.

 Why do you care what I or my fellow Americans think about our constitution or bill of rights.We are, on the hole, not an aggressive nation. If we were ,after ww2 we would have ruled the world.Instead we went home.

   respectfully,demaw.

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
More Gun control???
« Reply #301 on: August 23, 2004, 03:38:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by demaw1
To say I have no Idea, or little knowledge, of how other countries came to be, is again intelligently dishonest. I recieve knowledge of europe in the same way you recieve knowledge of america.I will put my history education up against yours any time.

Bollocks. You've never been here. Have you ever left the US? Maybe you don't have enough freedom to do that. :lol I have lived in America, and been to about 41 states. I picked up quite a bit of civil war history on visits to Stone Mountain,GA and Charleston,SC. Not saying I'm an expert. Where do you learn your European history? I'd hazard a guess and say random Google searches for troll bait. I've already commented on your spelling, which would be much better if you read quality history books - assuming you learned from them. Perhaps you do read them, and learn nothing...

Magna Carta was in the time of King John, 1215 - and I don't mean 15 minutes after noon. Of course it was an important event, but we don't think about it on a daily basis the way you think of Thomas Jefferson every time you see a gun. :rolleyes:
Quote
Yes I do believe we have more freedom than you ,only because I believe we have more of a chance of keeping it than you do. The fact is , you can not stop your gov from doing anything it wants to when it wants to. Our gov. has to stop and think first , simply because we are armed. Does that mean it is written in stone that we would prevail? No it doesnt,but like our fore fathers I would rather die taking a few with me, than live in bondage.
That one paragraph encapsulates your naivety. There's no way that scenario is ever going to be played out, and I think you know it.
Quote
The fact is , you can not stop your gov from doing anything it wants to when it wants to.
Taking this sentence in isolation, and it's bollocks! Didn't you read what I said earlier? No, clearly not.:(  Very well, I will repeat.

Do you remember who Margaret Thatcher was? She was Prime Minister of Britain 1979-1990, a period which completely overlapped the Reagan presidency. And the two of them were very good friends. MT had great power, and won three election victories, providing her with an unassailable position in the House of Commons. Under her premiership, the trade unionists "quivered under their bunks", to coin a Lazsism. The era of industrial disputes and stoppages was ended under her iron rule. Indeed, she became known as the Iron Lady in British politics. Under her rule, the cloth cap era came to a close, and industrial dinosaurs that did little more than soak up taxpayers' money were laid to rest. She eschewed the erstwhile punitive income taxes established by Labour - 83%, plus a 15% investment income surcharge! :eek: Under MT, IIS was abolished, and the top rate of income tax reduced by more than half to 40%. Whole industries were privatised and given a new lease of life, eg. Jaguar Cars having been freed from union shackles had half the work force but produced more cars than before, and they were much better cars than before. She also decided wisely that governments should not be in the business of running airlines, and so British Airways (which had lost hundreds of millions of £ while under state control) was privatised, and went on to become the most profitable airline in the world. There's more, but you get the picture.

But in 1989, she went too far with her reforms, and introduced the Community Charge (nicknamed the Poll Tax after a similar tax in 1381) as a means of collecting money for local services, to replace the old Rates system. There was uproar and outrage. There were demonstrations in the streets, and votes against the Government in local and by-elections. MT's own ministers could see the writing on the wall, and one rose up to declare that MT's huge achievements were best protected under the premiership of someone else. There was a leadsership contest, and MT lost. She had to suffer the ignominy of being driven to Buckingham Palace to tender her resignation to HM The Queen, and of being driven away in a different car, as she was no longer entitled to use the prime ministerial limousine. For some BBC archive material on the whole debacle, click here.  For an account of the original 1381 Peasants' Revolt: http://www.britannia.com/history/articles/peasantsrevolt.html

Now Demaw, I hope you might learn a few things from this account. Let me bullet point them for you.
  • Britain is not a totalitarian state.
  • No-one has absolute power.
  • The British public IS allowed the freedom to make peaceful demonstrations, and can speak out against the government.
  • People are allowed to drive past a group of demonstrators and honk their car horns  in support, without being tasered by the police.
  • MT was brought down as a result of public protest and outrage, and the realisation of ministers that she could not be allowed to continue.
I'll post all this again next week, as clearly it will take you several readings to assimilate. :p

Damn shame about Maggie; I liked her.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2004, 05:46:17 AM by beet1e »

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
More Gun control???
« Reply #302 on: August 23, 2004, 08:20:54 AM »
beetle... to answer your questions.  

Where did I say that I trusted released mass murders with a gun?  I said...  that they should be given their gun upon release.   If they are still too dangerous to be given their own firearm back then they are far too dangerous to be released to go and find one illegaly.   Let's just get it out in the open.

I do trust my neighbors with guns.   I trust them more tho if I also have a gun...  Most of the people who are a threat to others are not simply neighbors...  I am an American tho... not gonna get into the whole ruling class thing with you... I am no better or worse a person to have a gun than my neighbors and I am sure that toad and wrag et all agree.   Until my neighbors show that they can't be trusted with firearms... I'm not gonna judge.

You said two questions but then you also asked..

Something about colored folks being able to buy 44 mag revolvers and how Jefferson couldn't have forseen that?   Well... he did forsee bad people strongarming good people... in those days... a bad guy couled have a 75 caliber pistol and.... you didn't get quite the fussy medical care you do now.

people haven't changed... governments haven't changed and guns are still deadly.  And... the constitution is even more appropriate now than ever.

A citizenship skilled in firearms use is indeed a threat to a tyranical government.

And.... exactly how much has your murder rate gone down now that you have this draconian gun laws that disarm your citizens?  Your crime has gon up since then when it was falling before the gun laws.   I can see how you would be naive about crime in your area... the king never expected peasants to poach the kings land until they did....  The lower class is capable of anything eh?

lazs

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
More Gun control???
« Reply #303 on: August 23, 2004, 08:27:02 AM »
I also notice that in your lecture on British politics you praise MT ( I liked her too... best brit leader ever)..

What you praise is her lowering taxes and her privatising all the socialism...... you seem to be saying that the government is clumsy and stupid and wasteful and yet...

You like their gun control ideas that are proven to do nothing but raise crime?  Some failed government policies you despise but other rfailed government medling is ok if it suits your fears of your lower class "stupid people"?

curval thinks losing his rights is ok if it will possibly save a few future royal rulling class from getting shot.   He would give up golf if golf clubs were seen to be a threat byu the rulling class.

lazs

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
More Gun control???
« Reply #304 on: August 23, 2004, 08:55:02 AM »
Hi Lazs!
Quote
people haven't changed... governments haven't changed and guns are still deadly. And... the constitution is even more appropriate now than ever. ...A citizenship skilled in firearms use is indeed a threat to a tyranical government.
When England was a nation growing up, which I will define as from the Roman occupation through the Norman conquest and to the end of the Middle Ages, guns had not been invented. By the time guns had been invented, and existed in significant numbers, Britain had stable government, owned a third of the world and had the most powerful navy in the world - and had got over its paranoia about tyrannical governments by then.
Quote
You like their gun control ideas that are proven to do nothing but raise crime?
You're still spouting these fallacies, despite the enormous efforts Nashwan has applied to bringing the real stats to this board. But you choose to ignore them for some reason. ;)

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
More Gun control???
« Reply #305 on: August 23, 2004, 09:00:24 AM »
Wow.  After dredging up all those crime stats that separate you...a white man...from the black and hispanics that commit all the crime in the United States I find it particularly amusing that you throwing accusations of eliteism and class "bigotry" around.

:D :D
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
More Gun control???
« Reply #306 on: August 23, 2004, 10:52:06 AM »
beetle... I took the charts directly from the home office website that nashwan linked me to.   I named the chart that showed crime going down before the ban and then going up after... I got no response.

curval... what is your point?   I am not saying to ban guns from black people... I use black people only to point out that your (UK) homicide rate is not much different than ours if you remove the blacks from the equation... you simply have a different population makeup for better or worse.

englands homicide rate did not get better after the ban... I think it would get worse in the U.S.    I don't want the criminals to have a free ride... I don't want to cower under my bed like a brit.

lazs

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
More Gun control???
« Reply #307 on: August 23, 2004, 01:09:42 PM »
LOL - I can't fit under my bed. I have drawers under it.

I'll leave Nashwan to deal with the stats.

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
More Gun control???
« Reply #308 on: August 23, 2004, 02:08:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
I use black people only to point out that your (UK) homicide rate is not much different than ours if you remove the blacks from the equation... you simply have a different population makeup for better or worse.


lol...yup.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
BTW Lazs...
« Reply #309 on: August 23, 2004, 02:11:07 PM »
You keep saying that Britain's 1996 gun ban was the cause of rising crime. In an earlier thread (your favourite poll thread - LOL), Momus answered this point thus:
Quote
Lazs, I see you're still asserting that the there's a causal link between a crime rate that was already going up prior to the hand-gun ban and the '96 hand-gun ban itself, despite no evidence to back this up.

The argument might fit the US model but it doesn't hold for the UK, unless you're seriously arguing that a few thousand pistol enthusiasts with their weapons either stored in guns clubs or at home in a locked safe were the only thing holding back the crime wave you seem to believe has swamped us in the years since the ban. :lol


Where the hell's Demaw? Must still be working. So much for his freedom. :rofl

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
More Gun control???
« Reply #310 on: August 23, 2004, 02:29:50 PM »
momus quote makes about as much sense and banning firearms for everyone in bermuda because a few of the upper class royals got shot...  

Momus is basicly saying that just because crime goes up when guns are banned that there is no relationship between criminals getting bolder and citizens being unable to defend themselves.

Lets say that it stayed the same... let's pretend that it didn't go up... if that were the case then you would conclude that you gave up your gun rights for a gain of...... nothing.


curval... laugh if you want but... I have never said that we should take guns away from blacks..  You on the other hand are claiming that we should take guns away from everyone because a few thousand blacks and whites abuse them.


lazs

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
More Gun control???
« Reply #311 on: August 23, 2004, 02:35:33 PM »
No lazs.

Firstly the governor is not a royal.

Secondly I'm not saying we should take guns away from any of you in the US.  I simply support the ban on this island.

Thirdly, I realise you don't want to take guns away from blacks.  With all that trust you have for all of your citizens you don't want to take guns away from anyone.  But...you are quite happy to blame all the crime on blacks and then suggest that you need your guns to defend yourself.  I can only assume from this that you are defending yourself against blacks.

But go on...tell me how "I" am being elitest again...go on...it is quite hilarious.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline wrag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3499
More Gun control???
« Reply #312 on: August 23, 2004, 02:52:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Curval
No lazs.

Firstly the governor is not a royal.

Secondly I'm not saying we should take guns away from any of you in the US.  I simply support the ban on this island.

Thirdly, I realise you don't want to take guns away from blacks.  With all that trust you have for all of your citizens you don't want to take guns away from anyone.  But...you are quite happy to blame all the crime on blacks and then suggest that you need your guns to defend yourself.  I can only assume from this that you are defending yourself against blacks.

But go on...tell me how "I" am being elitest again...go on...it is quite hilarious.


IMHO Laz is not saying that at all.  He's quoting the stats.

The Stats are the Stats.  Laz nor I nor anyone else can change the stats.

I have to say, from where I grew up, that the stats are probably pretty accurate.  I found myself having to deal with a certain mindset in certain areas of this nation.  While to some this might seem skin color specific I tended to look at the area as having a conciderable affect on those stats.  Some areas of several states seem to have some pretty harsh people in them.  Or at least some of these people seem to have a mindset that results in a very harsh response to certain types of prodding.  These areas seem to be connected to large inner city type places.

The numbers are there.  Laz didn't make em up.
It's been said we have three brains, one cobbled on top of the next. The stem is first, the reptilian brain; then the mammalian cerebellum; finally the over developed cerebral cortex.  They don't work together in awfully good harmony - hence ax murders, mobs, and socialism.

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
More Gun control???
« Reply #313 on: August 23, 2004, 02:56:33 PM »
No..but he keeps manipulating them.

Why does he want to take black people out of those stats?  To try show that the UK stats vs the US are pretty much equal when this is done.

Now think very hard about what he is really saying.

Then read some of the tidbits from his other posts:

"Whites have more to fear from blacks with guns than vice versa... more than twice as much in fact.. "

"As for the racial issue... It is important only when people ask why we have so many murders in the U.S. and then try to blame a bunch of white folks in pointed hoods out shooting poor blacks out of fear as moore portrayed in "bowling" When it is brought out that 15% of the population commits allmost 60% of the homidcides it becomes an important issue.

"Whites and lawful blacks would seem to need to be armed more rather than less."

Note the use of "whites and lawful blacks.

But yet "I" am being elitest.  lol  

Even one of lazs' "converts" views the US this way:

"So the issue is not so much about guns but the relatively large underclass of underprivileged, uneducated people, often from minorities who exist around the edges of society in the United States. "
« Last Edit: August 23, 2004, 03:06:07 PM by Curval »
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
More Gun control???
« Reply #314 on: August 23, 2004, 03:50:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
momus quote makes about as much sense and banning firearms for everyone in bermuda because a few of the upper class royals got shot...  

Momus is basicly saying that just because crime goes up when guns are banned that there is no relationship between criminals getting bolder and citizens being unable to defend themselves.
No. Momus is pointing out that the only people who were affected by the change in the gun law were a relative handful of gun club enthusiasts, and that to link any rise in crime with the gun ban is to accredit those few thousand pistol shooting enthusiasts with holding back a crime wave.