Author Topic: NOW I understand... (Read 3307 times)

Steve · « **Reply #105 on:** December 11, 2004, 01:10:18 PM »

Whitehawk, you know who is going to pay for it. Do you have a point?

WhiteHawk · « **Reply #106 on:** December 11, 2004, 01:14:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga
What do you mean who's going to pay? Government of course, are you saying individual Americans should pay that debt?

No, steve seems to subscribe to that theroy and I agree.

I dont wanna pay for no mammies 15 illigitamate, father unknown, street dwelling, crack junkies, and i dont wanna pay for no, loot america while we enrich ourselves and blame it on the terrorists, either.
Maybe we should let each individual decide where his tax money gets spent.

WhiteHawk · « **Reply #107 on:** December 11, 2004, 01:27:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Whitehawk, you know who is going to pay for it. Do you have a point?

No, i must be in the wrong thread, sorry.

WhiteHawk · « **Reply #108 on:** December 11, 2004, 01:31:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Wow Bodhi, you are dragging the biggest whackjobs out of the weeds. I agree that the liberal left, like Thrawn, RPM, and their ilk are dangerous to anyone who wants to keep the money they earn. I'm just not convinced that my friend Airhead is off the charts to the left like the heretofore mentioned whackos.

Oh yea, here it its.

Do you think that a massive financial debt is dangerous to those who want to keep the money they earned?

Swager · « **Reply #109 on:** December 11, 2004, 01:42:28 PM »

Sometimes people find it had to let go as they watch their country slowly spiral down the crapper.

I do have faith in this country for she'll recover from her mistreatment in the long run. Maybe not in my lifetime, but she will recover from the damage.

Hopefully in the near future we can have presidential candidates who are ethical and possess integrity. I know it is a dream but I am not so ignorant to believe that we actually have that now.

Steve · « **Reply #110 on:** December 11, 2004, 04:34:40 PM »

Quote

Do you think that a massive financial debt is dangerous to those who want to keep the money they earned?

Dangerous? Nope.

Thrawn · « **Reply #111 on:** December 11, 2004, 05:30:53 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Dangerous? Nope.

Nice answer Kruschev. When you go into debt you give power to those who you are indebted to. Which sucks if you like freedom, but is great if you are commie.

WhiteHawk · « **Reply #112 on:** December 11, 2004, 07:10:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Dangerous? Nope.

Okay, so lets sum this up. Whackjobs like thrawan and rpm are dangerous to those who wish to keep thier hard earned money, but a debt that requires emergency legislation to prevent the country from going bankrupt, no problemo eh?

Must be nice to be a conservative, so loud, yet so simple.

Airhead · « **Reply #113 on:** December 11, 2004, 09:08:55 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by WhiteHawk
Okay, so lets sum this up. Whackjobs like thrawan and rpm are dangerous to those who wish to keep thier hard earned money, but a debt that requires emergency legislation to prevent the country from going bankrupt, no problemo eh?

Must be nice to be a conservative, so loud, yet so simple.

WhiteHawk, a balanced budget is the cornerstone of a fiscal conservative agenda, which is one of the few conservative agendas I believe in. Unfortunately, the current administration breaks from this tenant of conservatism in favor of buy now pay later policies- and the fanbois excuse this by making believe nobody will ever, ultimately, have to pay the debt.

Steve · « **Reply #114 on:** December 11, 2004, 10:42:23 PM »

Yes Airhead and Whitehawk, we should fight the war with no budget, right? You studmuffings cry on one hand that there isn't enough armored vehicles to go around then cry on the other that the budget is too high.

You piss and moan out of both sides of your mouth.

My view is simple: the war is just, and must be paid for.

Tards like Thrawn and Co. want to take my hard earned income and redistribute it. It was this I was originally refering to, not the budget.

Get it?

Thrawn · « **Reply #115 on:** December 12, 2004, 03:32:45 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Tards like Thrawn and Co. want to take my hard earned income and redistribute it.

Prove it. If not, TAKE IT!

Quote

My view is simple: the war is just, and must be paid for.

Sweet, sweet commienism. You believe in it, therefore you want all the other taxpayers to pay for it, even if they don't believe in it. Thanks for proving my point again Trotsky. You can't possibly know if you are a capitalist, socialist or not because you don't know the difference.

Steve · « **Reply #116 on:** December 12, 2004, 05:21:02 AM »

Quote

You can't possibly know if you are a capitalist, socialist or not because you don't know the difference.

*snicker*

Are you randomly putting words together to form sentences?

I have to prove nothing. You've already establised that you're a socialist whackjob.

Quote

TAKE IT!

heheheheh!

Staga · « **Reply #117 on:** December 12, 2004, 09:40:43 AM »

Steve you might want to stop digging any deeper

Steve · « **Reply #118 on:** December 12, 2004, 12:46:58 PM »

Staga, STFU I don't know you.

AKIron · « **Reply #119 on:** December 12, 2004, 12:53:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Airhead
WhiteHawk, a balanced budget is the cornerstone of a fiscal conservative agenda, which is one of the few conservative agendas I believe in. Unfortunately, the current administration breaks from this tenant of conservatism in favor of buy now pay later policies- and the fanbois excuse this by making believe nobody will ever, ultimately, have to pay the debt.

One way to eliminate the excessive spending of hundreds of billions on social programs is to go broke. That's what the democrats are really so angry about isn't it? That we're spending money on something besides them?