Dear Rolex,
As amazing as it may seem, millions of Americans are greatly inconvenienced every day, and billions of dollars are spent, because 12 men boarded four jumbo jets, took them over and flew them into major buildings, killing over 3000 people and destroying NYCs most prominent landmark. Since that time, the inconveniences and infringements we have been forced to submit to have uncovered well over a dozen similar plots.
We do have a choice you know, we can go back to the freer society we had pre-9/11 but the inevitable result will be that we have to deal with a few successful attacks every year. Of course, the moment the catastrophe occurs the public will go into a frenzy demanding more and more restrictions. "Why wasn't this prevented? Why wasn't his background checked?" Nothing though, not even surrender, as the Spaniards have learned, will cause the men who are plotting those attacks to stop doing so.
What many Westerners have failed to grasp is that Jihad is a forever war, it keeps going until the Dar-El-Islam extends throughout the world and all men everywhere submit to Sharia. There is no acceptable "stopping point" short of that objective.
Anyway, Rolex, RPM, et al you find the current administration's response to Jihad to be unacceptable. Fair enough. But tell me, what would you do differently, how would you respond to the situation as it currently stands? Lets say you were elected tomorrow, what would you do vis a vis the American response to the international Jihad? I am genuinely curious.
- SEAGOON