Originally posted by Cynic
Oh puhleaze!!! Crushed?! Are you having your period?.
I didn't see that part. I saw that they had guns on him.
I didn't find this in the story either. The feds said he was peaking around corners, there's nothing from the kid denying it.
Bwahahahaha!!! Let's also do away with police protection, military defense. Let's just arm the public and let them shoot it out. Whoever's still standing, inherits the earth.
Well you’re off to a great first day.
The kid (in the story) was posting to the FORUM I found the link on. Talking about how the article was misleading. Maybe you should work on your reading skills. You may not like reading things from people who don't bother to check spelling and grammar but in the future I think I will avoid reading your spew because you are rude caustic.
You are not going to last long around here.
I also guess it is OK that federal agents stopped a college kid who was jogging, pull guns on him with the false assumption he had a gun, detain him and kneel on his neck, all for nothing. (yes the article does not say this but I will take the kids word over the feds since they didn’t charge him with a crime and are going to need to cover their asses)
You did catch the part where he was not charged with a crime?
Maybe you are fine with fed agents kneeling on an innocent kids neck for the MAJOR crime of wearing bandanas on his face, but since I don't think that is against the law ANYWHERE in the country I think it is an abuse of power.
I am all for reasonable law enforcement if you think that’s what this is you’re in the wrong era, and country.
If this is how you acted with your last ID on this board I can see why you were so reluctant to let people know who you were.