Author Topic: The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread  (Read 2713 times)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #120 on: May 20, 2006, 10:23:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lukster
I have to disagree with Toad on this. Nuke one of our cities and we'll find someone responsible.


Actually, I'm afraid we'll just find someone, whether they are responsible or not.

Not quite the same thing, is it.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #121 on: May 20, 2006, 10:26:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
We're just going to take a few on the chin and have to overcome that and move on.
====
someone send an aid car to toads place...he is obviously crying out for help on this :cry


And Yeager, you're crying out for some serious reflection on this.

If YOU were President when it happened and your intel agencies and "nuclear forensic" detectives told you they just had no proof on who had done it....

...who would you nuke?

You'd be taking a shot in the dark and killing MILLIONS of people without any proof.

You can live with that?
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #122 on: May 20, 2006, 10:27:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
Actually, I'm afraid we'll just find someone, whether they are responsible or not.

Not quite the same thing, is it.


I am pretty sure if one of our cities get nuked, the left will blame Bush, and that will be the same people opposing everything about the Patriot Act, the phone surveillance, Gitmo, etc.   Kind of a no-win when someone serves an agenda of hate instead of accepting the reality that there are people who want to destroy our country and kill us all, and are actively working to do just that.

dago
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #123 on: May 20, 2006, 10:35:24 PM »
It will certainly revise the political debate in this country.

Bet we won't be worrying near as much about whether or not "In God We Trust" is on the coinage.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Mr Big

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 544
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #124 on: May 20, 2006, 10:46:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
And Yeager, you're crying out for some serious reflection on this.

If YOU were President when it happened and your intel agencies and "nuclear forensic" detectives told you they just had no proof on who had done it....

...who would you nuke?

You'd be taking a shot in the dark and killing MILLIONS of people without any proof.

You can live with that?


Been following this thread a bit and you have a good point. It's interesting to think about the scope of this problem.

I'd been thinking along the lines of an announced doctrine which would target any/every nuclear capable, terrorist supporting nation with a nuclear response should we get hit.

It's a "tough love" kind of thing.

of course, this doctrine could also be used against us.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2006, 10:49:12 PM by Mr Big »

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #125 on: May 20, 2006, 10:50:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mr Big
Been following this thread a bit and you have a good point. It's interesting to think about the scope of this problem.

I'd been thinking along the lines of an announced doctrine which would target any/every nuclear capable, terrorist supporting nation with a nuclear response should we get hit.

It's a "tough love" kind of thing.


HMMM.. announce this is what we would do. Might make them think about giving samples of uranium .


Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #126 on: May 20, 2006, 10:56:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mr Big
Been following this thread a bit and you have a good point. It's interesting to think about the scope of this problem.

I'd been thinking along the lines of an announced doctrine which would target any/every nuclear capable, terrorist supporting nation with a nuclear response should we get hit.

It's a "tough love" kind of thing.

of course, this doctrine could also be used against us.



 I could be mistaken but, I seem to remember this sort of ultimatum/threat issued before. I just can't remember when but it was along those lines that if we are attacked with nuclear/chemical or biological weapons the govt. of the United States would see it as an attack by all hostile nations who support or aid terrorists or terrorist states & the U.S. would retaliate with all means at our disposal up to & including nuclear weapons.

 I just wish I could remember when & where I heard this. Seems like the president said it & it was around 9-11 but I'm just not sure.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #127 on: May 20, 2006, 11:53:22 PM »
If a WMD is used against a dense population center of the US then I am of the opinion that the survival of the nation is jeapordy.  As president I would use military force to rearrange the global geography in such a manner that eliminates forever the threat of militant Islam to our people.   That part of Islam that is peaceful, has babes and likes rock music shall be preserved.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline AlGorithm

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 117
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #128 on: May 21, 2006, 12:09:23 AM »
Quote
Yeager wrote:
If a WMD is used against a dense population center of the US then I am of the opinion that the survival of the nation is jeapordy. As president I would use military force to rearrange the global geography in such a manner that eliminates forever the threat of militant Islam to our people. That part of Islam that is peaceful, has babes and likes rock music shall be preserved.

So as long as we can't tell it's an Israeli nuke....

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #129 on: May 21, 2006, 12:09:57 AM »
we're on a mission.

... a mission from god.

gotta make the world safe for rock and roll!

..they fear the music. it contaminates their young.

we must use this fear.. build radio and TV stations all around them.... pump in free TV's and radios.. and free Porn. ALL OF IT.

Muahahhahahahhahhahhahhahhahh aha!
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #130 on: May 21, 2006, 12:13:33 AM »
Yeah, drop B-52 loads of Penthouse on them.  Build McMohammeds everywhere.

Now yer talkin'.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #131 on: May 21, 2006, 12:24:44 AM »
Totally strangle their airwaves. Full Spectum. Jam all channels but ours. Feed it ALL to 'em.. 250 channels of Porn, MTV. Cooking With Pork. NASCAR. Debbie Does Dallas. Brokeback CSPAN. O'Rielly. ALL OF IT!

MUAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA!
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #132 on: May 21, 2006, 12:26:43 AM »
Oh, and Yeager.... as for your "nuke 'em all" idea, I can't think of a better, faster way to turn even our truest allies into enemies.

For some reason people think you can hose off a couple dozen multi-megaton weapons and not have a serious ecological consequence of radiation drift to unintended areas.

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Mr Big

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 544
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #133 on: May 21, 2006, 12:35:02 AM »
Nuclear war is going to happen. Nothing can stop it.

Offline Debonair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3488
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #134 on: May 21, 2006, 12:43:35 AM »
cambodia?!? man, u kiddin me