Author Topic: Skuzzy HighBand width options.  (Read 724 times)

Offline indian

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Skuzzy HighBand width options.
« on: April 13, 2000, 12:48:00 PM »
Do you know anything about the wireless connection coming to the metroplex? If so how will it effect gaming? Also what are best setting for ADSL connections?

------------------
Tommy (INDIAN) Toon
  1st Aces High Trainer Corps.
Home of The Allied Fighter Wing A.F.W.
A.F.W. Homepage

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Skuzzy HighBand width options.
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2000, 11:37:00 AM »
Ahhh, wireless broadband, yet another technology with a lot of promises.

Wireless has some potential, but (seems there always is a but) it has the same types of problems as DSL or cable does.

Wireless works sort of like cell phones do and are full of the same types of problems digital cell phone technology.

The antenna(s) for this technology operate at one given frequency.  This frequency is split up to form each wireless connection.  The granularity of the split is adjustable, but it is not infinite.
As the bandwidth of the signal is used, the connection speed potential gets reduced.  In order to keep this speed up, another antenna must be used in the cell network.
Like DSL and cable modems, the more users that join the network, the slower the throughputs get.  No where, in any marketing or advertising will you see the term "fixed rate" as it applies to the connection speeds.  The speeds are advertised maximum rates, and not fixed rates.
The other problem with wireless broadband, and it is a geographical problem, is the D/FW area is very "dirty".  That is to say, the amount of air signals are very high, which causes problems for a lot of the wireless communication technology companies.

Now about DSL.  I know you are in the GTE area, which is not a bad place to be.  GTE has done a really good job with thier DSL service (telco service).

Between the DSL, cable modem, and wireless technologies, I would go with DSL every time.  Performance reasons aside, DSL is wire based and not susceptible to the inherent problems of wireless.  A piece of aluminum foil drifting in front of an antenna and BOOM, you are offline.
DSL also has redundency in the infrastructure of the telco.  Cable modem does not.
As much as we like to bash telcos, the response time for fixing problems is much better than the cable company, and the wireless companies.
Just from the point of reliability, DSL wins hands down over all competing technologies.
DSL also allows you to chose the ISP you want to use.  None of the others allow that.

The cost is higher for DSL, but I like the lack of frustration.  I will pay more to get rid of that.  

We have been offering DSL service since 3/99 and 6 months into it, we dropped our DSL service prices across the board.  We have had only 2 support calls from all our DSL clients, and one was due to a temporary outage, which GTE was good enough to put on thier support answer line, and the other was a bad ethernet card.
This may not be true in all parts of the country, but it is true here.



------------------
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
President, AppLink Corp.
http://www.applink.net
skuzzy@applink.net
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline indian

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Skuzzy HighBand width options.
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2000, 11:33:00 PM »
Skuzzy I have ADSL threw gte now and friend was looking into the wireless and I thought I would ask the question. I like my dsl connection.

------------------
Tommy (INDIAN) Toon
  1st Aces High Trainer Corps.
Home of The Allied Fighter Wing A.F.W.
A.F.W. Homepage

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Skuzzy HighBand width options.
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2000, 08:38:00 AM »
I have had an oppertunity to read some Usenet posts of people in the Metroplex who have signed up with the AT&T wireless connections.

To sum it up, they are not happy campers.  Steady connections are a problem.  They cannot get over 9600 baud for analog calls (i.e. FAX and so on), and the vioce quality is pretty bad.

The connections are browning out for seconds at a time and sometime just flat blacking out.

I would say it is a bit early and maybe AT&T will get it working better in the future, but right now it lloks like they are going through some learning curves.  At least that is my best guess.

As I understand wire based and wireless based technologies pretty well, I would have to say that wire based is always going to be a better connection, until some new breakthrough technology for wireless comes along.  Right now, wireless is really not ready for prime time and will not be ready until they can prove it is as reliable as wire based technologies.


------------------
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
President, AppLink Corp.
http://www.applink.net
skuzzy@applink.net
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com