Originally posted by Eagler
it is just a matter of time
once the dems pull us out of Iraq, they, the cheekboness, will be able to concentrate on the next attack on US soil ....
,,,, and of course it will be Bush's fault when it happens...
unlike the US, our enemy has time and patience on their side
Wow, you actually believe that "they'll follow us home" stuff?
By this logic US forces must stay in Iraq forever to ensure that only our troops get killed. Even if 10,000 more US troops die until Iraq is secure, it wont matter... History tells us this endeavor will FAIL. I wish Bush had a brilliant plan.. heck I wish he had a plan at all, or a clue.
Iran was already "secure" with a strong military and intact infrastructure when the US installed the Shah of Iran.. the US bolstered Iran's military and intelligence services with billions. The CIA created & trained SAVIC (aka Savik), known by people in the mid east as worse than Nazi gestapo.
No matter how hard the US tried, the people of the mid east, and in Iran, rejected the US puppet and kicked the Shah out.
So I ask you, why, or HOW, will the US succeed in Iraq when we failed in Iran?
The people of the mid east didn't want us there before, which is partly why 9/11 happened in the 1st place.. and now that Bush has poked the hornets nest... I can only imagine now they're really pissedoff.
Edit:
Declassified CIA documents relating to Iran:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/mideast/iran-cia-intro.pdfSpeaking of "terrorism", the CIA engineered the bombing a cleric's home in a disinformation campaign to turn the country's Islamic religious community against Mossadegh's .gov.. isn't that what Bush now calls "state sponsored terrorism"?? if the CIA does it, it's justified... if Iran does it; its "terror"... is it any wonder they don't trust a damn thing the US has to say