Author Topic: HOers v Vulchers (landing)  (Read 2337 times)

Offline sethipus

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 304
HOers v Vulchers (landing)
« Reply #75 on: September 06, 2007, 04:43:47 PM »
I don't regard the MA as one big one-on-one duel, with every fight calculated to measure and highlight any and all differences in skill between pilots.  When I'm flying a mission in the MA, I try to shoot down enemy planes while not getting shot down.  Sometimes I'm supporting a larger effort like an attack on a base, or defending a base, or whatever.  Sometimes I'm just dogfighting and having fun.

I personally have no compunction against shooting down a landing plane.  Why would I?  He's the enemy.  It's not about whether it's a "fair fight" or not.  If that's what you insist on, go hang out in the DA and go 1 on 1 against people.

If you're going to land, land at a base that isn't under attack.  That's part of thinking and planning and acting intelligently.  It's part of having good SA.  If the other guy didn't plan where he was going to land so that he would land somewhere safe, and if he just went ahead landing even though his base was blinking and I was on his 6, well too bad, he's going to die, and that's all there is to it.

I really don't have too many unwritten rules in the MA, other than that I think it's exceedingly lame to shoot at a bomber or a fighter someone else has already lit on fire, or which is falling from the sky with no tail or wing, or whatever.  Blatantly shooting at an airplane which is already guaranteed dead, just to try to get the credit for the kill, is about as lame as it gets.

But killing a guy who tried to land with an enemy right there?  That's fair game, and the landing pilot is stupid, not the killing pilot is dishonorable.

My opinion, and I'm sticking with it.

Offline FBplmmr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
Re: Re: HOers v Vulchers (landing)
« Reply #76 on: September 06, 2007, 06:13:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Serenity
I dont think any of us needed to know this... :cry

lol. But on the subject, yes. Vulchin on takeoff is one thing. Its acceptable, as it helps to take the base. But if a plane is landing, he is LEAVING COMBAT, and thus is removing himself from the list of threats without you having to do anything. While it was practiced in WWII, that was because killing an Me-262 STOPPED that plane from taking off again. Not so in AH. Which means there really is no purpose to attacking a landing aircraft.


factor in a possible ENY change since he took off and yes you may be preventing a 262 from taking off;)