Whoo-hoo on fire!.
And it has nothing to do with the subject of women being equal to men, just the branding point of me poking poor Lazs with a red hot metal.
"Angus, you are having such a great kick out of emphasizing a dark side of the moon interpretation of lazs' posts, I'm not even going to bother. You're in the same sort of unilateral bind that keeps people from different cultures from understanding each other and seeing through each others' eyes."
I will emhasize a blatant dark side when I see one. I will compare this "culture understanding" thing you refer too as complete arrogance to what Lazs has been so loud about in the forums, - which is the issue of freedom. The guy with all those claims of gun owning freedom, freedom against the law (big things like wearing safety belts), freedom to have free business taking the planet wherever due to the freedom needed for the quick profit for ...some. And there it exposed. The freedom is not for women, because they are inferior in thought!
Well, maybe Lazs only knows "M.S. South Carolina" types, or does not consider Homo Sapiens (Sapiens) females as "Sapiens", but I really cannot sit idly by and look at him spread more of that crap.
And Moot, - call me uniliteral for not undertanding this term (as well as after it got emphasized). Okay, look again at Lazs:
"men should not hit women and they should hold open the door for em and they should be polite to em and they should offer up their seat on public transportation. Men should use their superior aggressiveness and strength to protect women and women... in turn... should not try to restrict men from having the tools to do these things."
Nice stuff you would have seen in USA mags in the 50's. We have a nice pinup in the style on the fridge.
"I believe that women, in general, are incapable of getting the last part. This makes their voting a dangerous proposition."
That was probably a weapon related thing, rather than a muscle restraint?
Anyway, you would presume the strength necessary is needed for assault (by men then) or natural causes?
"I can not stop them from voting but I do try to convince as many as possible to refrain from doing so or to at least ask some real man how to."
The real killer. Since they can't know well enough how to vote, how can they identify a real man? I mean, I don't even know how Lazs looks!!!
Come on, that last sentence from Lazs on women, is a total sig material.
"men should not hit women and they should hold open the door for em and they should be polite to em and they should offer up their seat on public transportation. Men should use their superior aggressiveness and strength to protect women and women... in turn... should not try to restrict men from having the tools to do these things.
I believe that women, in general, are incapable of getting the last part. This makes their voting a dangerous proposition.
I can not stop them from voting but I do try to convince as many as possible to refrain from doing so or to at least ask some real man how to."
hehe
(Naughty mode on. It's not so...girly)
p.s. Tigeress. You have guts. You should IMHO been allowed to vote, while Lazs, due to his tunnel vision should take and pass a test before.
(
mode still on)