Author Topic: battle ships  (Read 3471 times)

Offline Lukanian-7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 243
      • Lukanian-7's MySpace
Re: battle ships
« Reply #60 on: March 24, 2008, 09:45:56 AM »
Does It Have To Be American? Viva Bismarck.

Just Don't Ask For Little Biplanes w/ Torpedoes, Nor Rudder Repairs.

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: battle ships
« Reply #61 on: March 24, 2008, 12:03:54 PM »
The KMS Bismarck carried the Arado Ar.196 A-2 and A-3 serries.


Arado Ar196 and Crew
Werk.No.052, markings T3+IH Pilot: Unteroffizier Ernst Lange.
Observer: Leutenant Günter Lademann.
 
Werk.No.110, markings T3+AK Pilot: Feldwebel Oskar Andersen.
Observer: Leutenant zur See Rolf Hambruch.
 
Werk.No.123, markings T3+DL Pilot: Feldwebel Josef Kempfle.
Observer: Oberleutenant Siegfried Mühling.
 
Werk.No.150, markings T3+MK Pilot: Feldwebel Werner Seeliger.
Observer: Leutenant Martin Lange.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2008, 12:06:43 PM by DaddyAck »

Offline Lukanian-7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 243
      • Lukanian-7's MySpace
Re: battle ships
« Reply #62 on: March 24, 2008, 04:17:49 PM »
:huh Do You Like It?

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: battle ships
« Reply #63 on: March 25, 2008, 08:20:10 AM »
It is not meant to be a combat plane, it is a scout/spotting plane.

Offline Lukanian-7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 243
      • Lukanian-7's MySpace
Re: battle ships
« Reply #64 on: March 25, 2008, 08:42:58 AM »
:confused: I'm Talking About The German Battleship

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12797
Re: battle ships
« Reply #65 on: March 25, 2008, 09:25:06 AM »
No way mang, the texas was teh uber!  I mean it had to be it was named TEH TEXAS!1!1!!!eleventyoneunoeinetc...!11!1!

OMFGHAXORUBERAWESOMEZ  !!1!1!!1111!!!!11!!0.9999999999!!111!!!

Yes a battleship would be most excellent.
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: battle ships
« Reply #66 on: March 25, 2008, 10:21:25 AM »
:confused: I'm Talking About The German Battleship

Yeah, I like it.  If the KM had time to establish the surface fleet it wanted it would be a magor player in the Atlantic.  The Bismarck class was an impressive ship.

Offline Lukanian-7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 243
      • Lukanian-7's MySpace
Re: battle ships
« Reply #67 on: March 25, 2008, 10:23:06 AM »
Too Bad Those Fabric Biplane's Shot It's Rudder, In The Game, I Am Soooo Tying PT Boats To Create A "Shield" Around It.

That Is If We Ever Get It.

Offline minke

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 619
Re: battle ships
« Reply #68 on: March 25, 2008, 10:34:33 AM »
leave the swordfish alone man  ;) if the ship wasnt so freackin big and hadn't blown the hood to pieces, then half the atlantic fleet wouldnt have mobilised after it.

The Tirpitz was better, although it spent its career in a norweigian fjord it tied up so many allied resources it paid for itself anyway :rock

Offline Alpha202

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
Re: battle ships
« Reply #69 on: March 25, 2008, 03:05:48 PM »
Well, The Iowa would be a Primary target. Im pretty sure it was built as basically a battleship that could keep up with the carriers, it would be good for the task force I would think.
...

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: battle ships
« Reply #70 on: March 25, 2008, 04:45:03 PM »
Too Bad Those Fabric Biplane's Shot It's Rudder, In The Game, I Am Soooo Tying PT Boats To Create A "Shield" Around It.

That Is If We Ever Get It.

At the point where her unarmored rudders were jammed by the torp hit, she was alone and leaking fuel oil from her previous engagement with Prince of Whales and Hood and was steaming to France for repair.  The Prinz Eugen was no longer with her at that point.  Her anti aircraft weponry was substantial, but she was also stuck in a turn allowing the Brittish to bring all guns to bear where hers could not.  Tragic ending to an awesome Fighting Vessel.

Offline Lukanian-7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 243
      • Lukanian-7's MySpace
Re: battle ships
« Reply #71 on: March 25, 2008, 07:14:15 PM »
Are You Really Are A Walking Encyclopedia, Or Do You Use The Power Of Google Like I Do. :noid

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Re: battle ships
« Reply #72 on: March 27, 2008, 02:35:43 AM »
TEH BIZ-MARKY WAS TEH SUXXXXORZ!1!!1!!!11  IT GOT JWNED!1!11!!

"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline RoGenT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1328
Re: battle ships
« Reply #73 on: March 27, 2008, 11:21:21 PM »
I like this idea and the one that was suggested while back ago about LCT so we can land Tanks when trying to capture base from the CV group.
:salute Your fellow pony dweeb today!
Offical Knight Morale Officer
#1 Punk Knight on Vtards Hit List
Proud Pig!

Offline kennyhayes

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 504
Re: battle ships
« Reply #74 on: March 29, 2008, 06:08:00 PM »
ONLY AFTER WE DOUBLE AA/AAA ON TASK FORCES