Author Topic: IAR-80  (Read 3326 times)

Offline Peyton

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 228
ITALIAN CANTIERI MONFALCONE BOMBER
« Reply #60 on: February 14, 2010, 04:27:04 PM »
ITALIAN CANTIERI MONFALCONE BOMBER

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: IAR-80
« Reply #61 on: February 15, 2010, 07:51:21 AM »
another "Fighter" only mode a/c.  But sure, add it...AFTER giving the Italians something that can drop a bomb, or a 109f/2 with the 15mm & 4x50kg bombs.

Except that it was used extensively as a divebomber and fighter-bomber right from the get-go. With a radial engine and battery of multiple MGs and cannons, it was much more effective as a JaBo than the 109.
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: IAR-80
« Reply #62 on: February 15, 2010, 08:46:37 AM »
HT,

Please consider adding the Romanian plane IAR-80.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAR-80


Thanks,

WT




Nice... the nose and 6 view of a Corsair with none of the performance...

Yes please. Why? Because I WANT ALL OF 'EM.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: IAR-80
« Reply #63 on: February 15, 2010, 08:51:20 AM »
Nice... the nose and 6 view of a Corsair with none of the performance...

Yes please. Why? Because I WANT ALL OF 'EM.

How about not every addition has to be an uber-performing late war American plane? It was WORLD War II you know.
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: IAR-80
« Reply #64 on: February 15, 2010, 09:02:22 AM »
How about not every addition has to be an uber-performing late war American plane? It was WORLD War II you know.

That's my point. I really do want all of 'em. I even want the TBD Devastator - an airplane that had a significant impact on the war in the Pacific, even as it was shot down in droves. Let's face it, it's not as much fun if all we have is 425 mph cannon-armed single-seaters.

At the same time, priority-wise, I'd think an Italian bomber (probably the SIAI MArchetti 79), the He111, the Japanese G4M, the 410, and the Beaufighter are all more significant.

But, I wouldn't turn down the addition.

As for American planes... meh... don't like 'em much, though I appreciate the flat trajectories of their .50s.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: IAR-80
« Reply #65 on: February 15, 2010, 11:56:16 AM »
I'll vote for your IAR.80 if you back my bid for a Fairey Swordfish.

 :cool:
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: IAR-80
« Reply #66 on: February 15, 2010, 12:11:35 PM »
I'll vote for your IAR.80 if you back my bid for a Fairey Swordfish.

 :cool:

Ah Yes, the Stringbag - another piece o' crap... THAT I WANT. How about a Gloster Gladiator to use for a little EW Norway campaign?
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: IAR-80
« Reply #67 on: February 15, 2010, 12:20:58 PM »
Being a Pusser's Brat and Royal Navy nutcase, I'll happily fly a Sea Gladiator - as well as the Swordfish, Skua, Roc, Barracuda, Walrus, Seafox and any other Fleet Air Arm aircraft that anyone might care to code for AH.

Splice the mainbrace!

 :aok
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: IAR-80
« Reply #68 on: February 15, 2010, 12:30:49 PM »
Being a Pusser's Brat and Royal Navy nutcase, I'll happily fly a Sea Gladiator - as well as the Swordfish, Skua, Roc, Barracuda, Walrus, Seafox and any other Fleet Air Arm aircraft that anyone might care to code for AH.

Splice the mainbrace!

 :aok

Gimme that Fulmar, that I may be spray-plastered to the inside of its cockpit by the next passing Emil!

And did those feet,
in ancient time...
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: IAR-80
« Reply #69 on: March 21, 2010, 10:07:57 AM »
Just so you know HTC, WWI has not distracted us from this glaring oversite in the planeset of the Eastern Front.  :noid
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.