Who is Better? Rolling Thunder or Joker's Jokers?

[1pLUs44]

Well 1plus im not aware of anything being "started" by any squaddie of mine unless he was provoked by one of them.We wont shy away from anyone verbally attacking us on 200 or personal pm. Give details of the exchange and i may change my mind. Their missions being busted because a squaddie was in the right place at the right time isnt starting anything its more like knowing youre adversary and knowing the best way to stop a mission in its tracks however being accused of cheating like we were is starting something. I have no patience for that nonsense.

This Thread, basically a 13 page rant/troll on the Jokers and RT.

[Banshee7]

While i was flying knight earlier the Bish ran an NOE rad consisting of 7 sets of Lancs, multiple 110s, nikis, and an F4U....when this was sighted we decided to defend......0 town buildings were destroyed....and we attack them maybe 4 miles from our town 

[redwing7]

Hmmm,
I'm trying to understand this and I think I've got it now. We "Rolling Thunder" and Jokers Jokers are not good squads because we use noe and "horde" tactics and always attack undefended bases. To play the game correctly we should basically announce our attacks and limit our missions numbers resulting in endless hours of "furballing"....lol I got an idea, lets have a map with only 1 base for each country and make it an uncapturable!!! Seems that's what some would prefer. The only tactic that irritates me are the alt monkeys who sit at there 20k perch waiting for someone afk on autoclimb to pounce on....come to think of it, that tactic seems to be used in the forums as well as the arenas. Someone should have given 24 a "check six" before starting this post...lol

[Banshee7]

well...the idea of the game is aerial combat

[WMLute]

Do you know they were PM'ing eachother? After watching the witch hunts on this forum, and the ignorant "assumptions" on people that must be "right" the first sign of something suspicious, yes, sometimes its good, but when proved wrong, those accused hear no "sorry, my bad" nothing.

Roughly 200 out of 275 deaths is well beyond "suspicious" imho.

If I EVER caught a WM with stats like that they wouldn't be a WidowMaker much longer than the time it takes me to click the EJECT button.

[redwing7]

well...the idea of the game is aerial combat

Then why are there GV's?

[pope14]

Well to look at the sheep much closer of course.

[Messiah]

this thread sucks, kthx.

[Banshee7]

Then why are there GV's?

For planes to bomb...and when planes bomb GVs, they (the GVers) ask for aerial support.  The aforementioned "aerial support" engages with the planes attacking the GVs...therefore promoting aerial combat.  Anymore questions?

[redwing7]

Well to look at the sheep much closer of course.

 

[smokey23]

I always thought the game was a WW2 combat sim  

[Banshee7]

Aces High vs. point and click Aces Low 

[Bronk]

For all you little horde monkey land grabbers who think base taking/winning the war is what the game is all about.

This is a false assumption.


The game was designed to have fun at different types of combat. Conquering bases is just a means to promote combat and hence fun. But by no means is it more or less justified than going out and just mixing it up.


HiTech

Enjoy


 

[redwing7]

I always thought the game was a WW2 combat sim  

That's what i thought but i guess we're wrong.

For all you little horde monkey land grabbers who think base taking/winning the war is what the game is all about.



Enjoy


 

The game is imo, whatever you want it to be. if I wan to be a landgrabber it's my 15 bucks, if you want to be a furballer that's your choice. I never said one was "better" than the other.

[Banshee7]

Bronk