« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17   Go Down

Author Topic: Star Trek 2009  (Read 6076 times)

Offline 1701E

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1889
      • VBF-18 Bearcats
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #180 on: May 26, 2009, 04:01:43 PM »
Dweebs!

Not that I can talk, I keep repeating the scene in 'First Contact' where Picard refuses to blow up the ship, line-for-line. :D
Logged
ID: Xcelsior
R.I.P. Fallen Friends & Family

"The only ones who should kill are those prepared to be killed"

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17773
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #181 on: May 26, 2009, 04:03:55 PM »
Quote from: Anodizer on May 26, 2009, 11:13:45 AM
Ok, I've never watched the show....  Did this actually happen in the show??  If so, I'm buying the entire DVD set..... :rock

Well if you liked that clip. You gotta see this one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71Oo-BjKzCE
Logged
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline DrDea

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3341
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #182 on: May 26, 2009, 04:23:37 PM »
Quote from: Anodizer on May 26, 2009, 01:49:38 PM
During the Earth/Romulan War, Romulan ships were not powered by Anti-Matter and could only reach around Warp 2 for short periods of time before its deuterium stores were depleted..
Romulan ships of that era were Fusion Powered....  The precursor to Starfleet at that time(UE: United Earth) had just started to implement Matter/Antimatter reactors and their ships started
to take ship of the more traditional looking Starfleet vessels..  Romulan ships looked more like big mushrooms with the interior of the vessel housing mostly deuterium..
Weapons of the time were Atomic, Fusion, or conventional based on both sides of the conflict...

To answer your second question: this is just one of those things that violates its own canon throughout the whole Star Trek Saga....  In Balance of Terror, we see Specialist Martine
and Lt. Tomlinson getting married..  Ships are out on patrol or exploration missions for months, even years at a time..  They probably hadn't stopped off at a Starbase in at least 9 months..?
Logical that they would be together...  After all, dating isn't forbidden Starship..  Marriage obviously isn't forbidden Starship..  I don't think sex is forbidden on Starship..  
Pregnancy will happen..


  Entirely way to much geekyness being shown here. :lol
Logged
The Flying Circus.Were just like you.Only prettier.

FSO 334 Flying Eagles. Fencers Heros.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #183 on: May 26, 2009, 04:58:21 PM »
Don't make me throw down the gauntlet. :D
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline whels

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1517
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #184 on: May 26, 2009, 05:11:44 PM »
Quote from: BigPlay on May 26, 2009, 03:51:21 PM
Now the body on the green girl was definitely from another planet.  :aok

This is her. Diora Baird

Logged

Offline Anodizer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1940
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #185 on: May 26, 2009, 05:32:21 PM »
Quote from: 1701E on May 26, 2009, 04:01:43 PM
Dweebs!

Not that I can talk, I keep repeating the scene in 'First Contact' where Picard refuses to blow up the ship, line-for-line. :D

Love that line.... :rock

"The line must be drawn HERE!!  NO FURTHER!!" :salute
Logged
I like classy, beautiful, intelligent woman that say the "F" word a lot....

80th FS "Headhunters"

Offline Anodizer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1940
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #186 on: May 26, 2009, 05:33:48 PM »
Quote from: DrDea on May 26, 2009, 04:23:37 PM
  Entirely way to much geekyness being shown here. :lol

I agree...... :lol
Logged
I like classy, beautiful, intelligent woman that say the "F" word a lot....

80th FS "Headhunters"

Offline Anodizer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1940
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #187 on: May 26, 2009, 05:36:23 PM »
Quote from: DREDIOCK on May 26, 2009, 04:03:55 PM
Well if you liked that clip. You gotta see this one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71Oo-BjKzCE

Oh elements, I love this!!
Logged
I like classy, beautiful, intelligent woman that say the "F" word a lot....

80th FS "Headhunters"

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #188 on: May 26, 2009, 06:09:50 PM »
Quote from: Anodizer on May 26, 2009, 05:33:48 PM
I agree...... :lol

The irony is he's saying this in a thread about Star Trek, on a forum for a game where grown men pretend they're fighter pilots. :D
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline DrDea

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3341
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #189 on: May 26, 2009, 06:58:46 PM »
Quote from: Saxman on May 26, 2009, 06:09:50 PM
The irony is he's saying this in a thread about Star Trek, on a forum for a game where grown men pretend they're fighter pilots. :D
Oh gawd.Another impossible paradox.Where is Spock?
Logged
The Flying Circus.Were just like you.Only prettier.

FSO 334 Flying Eagles. Fencers Heros.

Offline DrDea

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3341
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #190 on: May 26, 2009, 07:03:59 PM »
Logged
The Flying Circus.Were just like you.Only prettier.

FSO 334 Flying Eagles. Fencers Heros.

Offline 1701E

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1889
      • VBF-18 Bearcats
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #191 on: May 26, 2009, 07:18:51 PM »
Quote from: Anodizer on May 26, 2009, 05:32:21 PM
Love that line.... :rock

"The line must be drawn HERE!!  NO FURTHER!!" :salute

"Oh I'm sorry!  Captain Ahab has to go, Hunt his whale!"
"What?"
"You do have books in the 24th century...?"
"This is not about revenge"
"Liar!"
"This is about saving the future of humanity!"
"Jean-Luc blow up the Dam* Ship!!"
"No! NOO!" "We've made too many retreats, they invade our space and we fall back, They assimilate entire planets and we fall back."  "Not this time, the line must be drawn HERE! NO Further!!"

Been a while since I watched it, so I likely messed up in spots. :)
Logged
ID: Xcelsior
R.I.P. Fallen Friends & Family

"The only ones who should kill are those prepared to be killed"

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #192 on: May 26, 2009, 07:30:56 PM »
We know the Borg can't adapt to physical damage, we've only ever seen it with energy-based weapons. Why don't they ever just replicate a bunch of Tommy Guns (yeah, that was a GREAT scene)?
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Anodizer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1940
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #193 on: May 26, 2009, 08:30:37 PM »
Quote from: Saxman on May 26, 2009, 07:30:56 PM
We know the Borg can't adapt to physical damage, we've only ever seen it with energy-based weapons. Why don't they ever just replicate a bunch of Tommy Guns (yeah, that was a GREAT scene)?

Awesome scene...  Especially when he starts yelling while firing into the Borg....
Logged
I like classy, beautiful, intelligent woman that say the "F" word a lot....

80th FS "Headhunters"

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Star Trek 2009
« Reply #194 on: May 26, 2009, 09:30:30 PM »
Tried to find a YouTube clip, but the only ones of that scene is the "Truffle Shuffle" modification, and some moron that replaced the soundtrack with some other music (I HATE when they screw up clips like that).
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17   Go Up
« previous next »