Author Topic: C47 Update.  (Read 2611 times)

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #30 on: October 20, 2009, 07:43:52 PM »
LOL!

 :rofl
Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #31 on: October 20, 2009, 07:50:54 PM »
That was some 68 guy from a while back, ohh the fun and plentyful whines!
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #32 on: October 20, 2009, 08:27:20 PM »
Jetdweeeb!!!!

Got my fire fly strafed by a 234 once. And we had a 234 NOE raid once....
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline StokesAk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3665
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #33 on: October 20, 2009, 08:41:55 PM »
I suck in a 234 so... I like to fly through hordes in them.

I dont get any kills, they just follow me around and try to kill me, eventually someone does.
Strokes

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #34 on: October 20, 2009, 08:42:56 PM »
I suck in a 234 so... I like to fly through hordes in them.

I dont get any kills, they just follow me around and try to kill me, eventually someone does.



So you pretty much trawl with a 234?
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline StokesAk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3665
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #35 on: October 20, 2009, 08:43:39 PM »
Thats a good way of putting it.
Strokes

Offline GreenEagle43

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 310
      • http://www.dickweedhbg.com
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #36 on: November 02, 2009, 07:47:24 PM »
lol. in deed a c-47 upgrade would be nice.....support our troops




 ya support our troops once there on the ground.fire when ready.lol :x
« Last Edit: November 02, 2009, 07:49:43 PM by GreenEagle43 »
Recruiting Officer GrnEagle  DHBG
Dedicated to Bish Country. 16 YEARS of BOMBER SERVICE

AN Aces High BOMBER SQUADRON. www.dickweedhbg.com

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #37 on: November 02, 2009, 08:02:36 PM »
lol. in deed a c-47 upgrade would be nice.....support our troops


 ya support our troops once there on the ground.fire when ready.lol :x

lol Give those guys who like to fight in the 234 a new fighter challenge to master!  I sure hope you don't receive a lot of :old: informing you of the historical inaccuracy of this post, we know you are joking.  :rock
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #38 on: November 02, 2009, 08:23:27 PM »
Thats a good way of putting it.

Lol, I've trawled with a C-47. Lured the guys who attack up to escorting fighters waiting couple k away.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline SectorNine50

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1331
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #39 on: November 02, 2009, 08:32:11 PM »
Was the AC-47 gunship around for WWII?  Would be sweet if it were... Hehe  :D  Gunning down towns from orbiting AC-47's... Hopefully we'll be able to have more than one gunner per plane some day.

As for the formations, I say YES to C-47 formations, but keep the number of troops needed to take the city the same...  The kicker:  Don't allow C-47's to release troops from the ground!  I think the land-then-roll-to-town-and-hop-out-of-the-C-47 thing is a bit... lame...

It'd be sweet to watch C-47 raids (like d-day) dropping hundreds of troops while ground and air forces try to eliminate them before they take the town.  Would really make the captures a lot more exciting than they are currently (for both sides).
I'm Sector95 in-game! :-D

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #40 on: November 02, 2009, 08:36:07 PM »
Was the AC-47 gunship around for WWII?

Nope. Korea and Vietnam, IIRC.

As for the formations, I say YES to C-47 formations, but keep the number of troops needed to take the city the same...

HTC has stated in the past that it will always remain an X:1 ratio. You want the real troop carrying capacity of the C47? It'll take 27 troops to capture a field. You want a 3x10 formation? It'll take 30 troops to capture a field. All that does is ruin more capture attempts waiting on troops.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2009, 08:38:34 PM by OOZ662 »
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline SectorNine50

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1331
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #41 on: November 02, 2009, 08:37:42 PM »
Ah bummer.  I really was hoping there would be a way to make airdrops necessary... :(
I'm Sector95 in-game! :-D

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #42 on: November 02, 2009, 08:39:15 PM »
Didn't say anything about that. Though I don't see what's wrong with it. Guys can get out of the plane the same way they came in...
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #43 on: November 02, 2009, 08:40:04 PM »
Ah bummer.  I really was hoping there would be a way to make airdrops necessary... :(
and if we increase the ammount of troops you can carry in one flight (be it through increased capacity or formations) then the number needed to take a base is increased by the same ammount.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline SectorNine50

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1331
Re: C47 Update.
« Reply #44 on: November 02, 2009, 08:43:57 PM »
Didn't say anything about that. Though I don't see what's wrong with it. Guys can get out of the plane the same way they came in...

Just seems silly to watch a C-47 land on a beach and taxi to the town.  I suppose there isn't anything "wrong" with it, but it kind of defies the point of paratroopers if you ask me.  If it were up to me, GV's would drop ground troops, C-47's would drop paratroopers.  Then again, I think the way captures work now are a bit boring, so I'm kind of "looking" for a different system.
I'm Sector95 in-game! :-D