Author Topic: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.  (Read 15172 times)

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #75 on: October 04, 2011, 01:02:57 PM »
The other thing is regarding that drop tank- with the Boston loaded with %100 fuel it only has roughly 30 min of flight, I would for sure use that DT if given the chance.  I'd fly a whole lot more bomber missions in Bostons if I could get further.  At 12,000, the Boston moves right along at 340mph TAS.

normal or max cruise settings give you a bunch more range, I normally climb at mil (which doesnt take long with the boston's outstanding climbrate) then cruise (which is still pretty quick for a buff) at 14-15k. that way you can shallow dive and accelerate down to its critical alt if you get intercepted.

I like bostons, the speed, climbrate and agility makes them tolerable for us fighter chaps :D
« Last Edit: October 04, 2011, 01:06:36 PM by RTHolmes »
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6996
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #76 on: October 04, 2011, 02:26:35 PM »
How about HTC gives you all the loadouts discussed for the A20 in exchange for removal of F3 mode?

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #77 on: October 04, 2011, 04:48:17 PM »
How about HTC gives you all the loadouts discussed for the A20 in exchange for removal of F3 mode?

 would gladly make that swap for the quad 20mm package :aok
  but then what excuse would people make for getting pawned by a bomber  :ahand  this would be intresting to find out  :lol


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline Raptor05121

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #78 on: October 04, 2011, 10:11:15 PM »
+1,000,000 for this.





























































But only after the B-26 gets updated  :noid
InGame: xRaptorx of the ***Alchemists***

Quote from: dirtdart
To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation.  It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught. 

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10633
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #79 on: November 10, 2011, 04:56:30 PM »



Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #80 on: November 10, 2011, 05:51:52 PM »
in the top diagram the 4 cannon are labelled 8, so whats in the ports under and behind them in the nose? :headscratch:
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #81 on: November 11, 2011, 01:52:44 AM »
That's....a good question.  9 appears to be pointing at it.


Is it me or is the top part of the 1st page a glass nose A-20?
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #82 on: November 11, 2011, 06:14:25 AM »
in the top diagram the 4 cannon are labelled 8, so whats in the ports under and behind them in the nose? :headscratch:

 thats where the 2 .50 cal cheek/chin ports are,   the 2 gun choices are  4 x 20mm nose + 2 .50 cal cheek or 4  .50 in the nose + 2 cheek
       either way you have 6 guns pointing forward.   :ahand


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6996
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #83 on: November 11, 2011, 07:39:15 AM »
mines were prolly one of those things that are wishful thinking for what i read.

semp

Prolly?

Are your asci characters taking that much bandwidth?

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10633
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #84 on: November 11, 2011, 03:48:30 PM »
Posted the last two line drawings mainly for the cross section of the ventral gun views on the second drawing.

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10633
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #85 on: August 02, 2012, 08:59:09 PM »
A page from the handbook gives some idea of the ventral guns sweep.


Offline Eric19

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 591
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #86 on: August 03, 2012, 10:15:36 AM »
+1 lyric nice resreach man give me rockets and torps and I'm a happy camper :devil
Proud member of the 91ST BG (H) The Ragged Irregulars

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #87 on: August 03, 2012, 04:55:53 PM »
At least we know the Russians took advantage of the factory hole in the cockpit deck to mount a PBP or PAK gunsight.




A20 under restoration.



bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #88 on: August 03, 2012, 05:17:55 PM »
Didn't most crews forgo using the ventral mount as it was pretty much ineffective?

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10633
Re: Boston/A-20 Upgrade.
« Reply #89 on: August 03, 2012, 05:37:29 PM »
Didn't most crews forgo using the ventral mount as it was pretty much ineffective?

ack-ack

No idea?