Reasonable proposals for a better AH

[Lusche]

There I was, thinking there was too much serious drama in the days before, and too little light hearted and obvious fun.


Maybe Bruv119 was right after all.... 

- don't let Germans try and have a sense of humour.   

 

[Myg]

There I was, thinking there was too much serious drama in the days before, and too little light hearted and obvious fun.


Maybe Bruv119 was right after all.... 


 

Its nothing to do with you Lusche, everything you see here existed before this thread. If you did not uncover it, someone else would of (that's why trolling exists, its a community self-defense mechanism).

[5PointOh]

My own personal qualm is that he is getting away with it because of all the previous "work" he has done in this regard, which has bought him "credit" with HTC, and rightly so: I wish HTC would admit to such situations occuring and be open about it as to provoke good behaviour among the community. But also I do not think number four should be slapped onto someone so lightly because of another's lack of perceptive ability for lightheartedness as a way of finding solace from his own worries (Hitech).

You cannot be serious.  To me it sounds like in the past you may have been slapped by HiTech for a post or series of post.

If I was HiTech, I smack you with the Ban-O-Matic for making the accusation of personal favors to players. I mean seriously Tiger, relax.

[Triton28]

There I was, thinking there was too much serious drama in the days before, and too little light hearted and obvious fun.


Maybe Bruv119 was right after all.... 


 

Usually when I think I'm the most funny... nobody laughs. 

I usually chalk it up to everyone being lots more stupider than I is.   

[Midway]

Usually when I think I'm the most funny... nobody laughs. 

I usually chalk it up to everyone being lots more stupider than I is.   

 

 

[Ten60]

Speechless that this hasn't been slapped with a #4 violation and deleted, I know if I had done it to prove a point I would of been banned.

I don't agree, lusche's behaviourial pattern suggests he is trying to root out some issue or problem within the community, wether it be perceptions or plain ol' personal rot on account of many here.

I say that because I do the same, but by dissecting people's reason or showing them inline obvious redundancies in situations; like such:

Hitech seems to forget that he is taking joy in this by responding to it and reveals he is actually part troll himself deep down (must be all the years of staring at the screen, boyo).

And at the same time luche's blatantly obvious "whistleing" emoticon is an attempt at making this light-hearted so that he does not avoid the hammer, while serving his wholesome purpose.

My own personal qualm is that he is getting away with it because of all the previous "work" he has done in this regard, which has bought him "credit" with HTC, and rightly so: I wish HTC would admit to such situations occuring and be open about it as to provoke good behaviour among the community. But also I do not think number four should be slapped onto someone so lightly because of another's lack of perceptive ability for lightheartedness as a way of finding solace from his own worries (Hitech).

Its nothing to do with you Lusche, everything you see here existed before this thread. If you did not uncover it, someone else would of (that's why trolling exists, its a community self-defense mechanism).

Related to another thread, you sir, I would love to have a beer with!

[Bruv119]

There I was, thinking there was too much serious drama in the days before, and too little light hearted and obvious fun.


Maybe Bruv119 was right after all.... 


 

 

[hitech]

Speechless that this hasn't been slapped with a #4 violation and deleted, I know if I had done it to prove a point I would of been banned.

See rule #5

I don't agree, lusche's behaviourial pattern suggests he is trying to root out some issue or problem within the community, wether it be perceptions or plain ol' personal rot on account of many here.

I say that because I do the same, but by dissecting people's reason or showing them inline obvious redundancies in situations; like such:

Hitech seems to forget that he is taking joy in this by responding to it and reveals he is actually part troll himself deep down (must be all the years of staring at the screen, boyo).

And at the same time luche's blatantly obvious "whistleing" emoticon is an attempt at making this light-hearted so that he does not avoid the hammer, while serving his wholesome purpose.

My own personal qualm is that he is getting away with it because of all the previous "work" he has done in this regard, which has bought him "credit" with HTC, and rightly so: I wish HTC would admit to such situations occuring and be open about it as to provoke good behaviour among the community. But also I do not think number four should be slapped onto someone so lightly because of another's lack of perceptive ability for lightheartedness as a way of finding solace from his own worries (Hitech).

See rule #4 .

HiTech

[SkyRock]

See rule #5

See rule #4 .

HiTech

  Myq  owned!

[JimmyC]

 

[Zacherof]

Bahahaha that's funny

[Myg]

See rule #5

See rule #4 .

HiTech

The first was in a question form without the question mark.

The second was a positive contribution to the thread, if you wish to pick out how it is not please reason it otherwise, instead of hearsay. The fact that you were able to invoke the above "yes man" typical responses further reveals the generalities in your approach.

[5PointOh]

You know it's not wise to poke the eye of the owner of the forums...

[Myg]

You know it's not wise to poke the eye of the owner of the forums...

I know its less wise to let the owner be blind to the way things are sometimes. Some of the greatest things were ruined due to lack of vigilance and fear of reprisal on behalf of the part of the community. I understand the desire for high quality players and interaction, which ironcically is one of the "joke" items on the original post but being pushed around by rules that can seemingly be bent at the slightest cross of mental perspective is something I am willing to give my virtual avatar up for. Even if it be my last one.

[Ack-Ack]

I know its less wise to let the owner be blind to the way things are sometimes. Some of the greatest things were ruined due to lack of vigilance and fear of reprisal on behalf of the part of the community. I understand the desire for high quality players and interaction, which ironcically is one of the "joke" items on the original post but being pushed around by rules that can seemingly be bent at the slightest cross of mental perspective is something I am willing to give my virtual avatar up for. Even if it be my last one.

Wow...falling on your sword over a silly game. 

ack-ack