You want to see what having a plane having a perk price does? Unperk the F4U-4 and enjoy.
In fact if the P-63 is ever added without a perk, I will be lobbying HARD for an unperked -4.
The P-63 will be perked of course, I think it falls along somewhere in the F4u-4 area in price. It won't be added WITHOUT perks, and don't think the f4u-4 will ever be unperked.
There are a number of planes that could be added that will see more MA use than the P-63 simply due to the perk cost.
Yes I can name 7 off top of my head too, however I see no actual argument that makes any sense to why the P-63 should not be added in game at some point. Every argument is "It shouldnt be added DERP! My reason is....... none?"
Maybe some people don't spend perks, maybe we need to start perking some planes just so we can actually force people to use the perks they earned. (51 with thousand lb bombs has been my argument from day one).
I see no opinion or argument that reverses my opinion on the P-63 and I have no interest in seeing the P-63 added in game. I am just defending the fact it served in combat and in squadron strength, it meets the criteria regardless of Perk price or anything else.
If anyone bothers to ever read any of my other forum posts, they would know I will lobby anything historical first without question, in fact I much rather EW or MW rides before anything else, I have no country in which I lean towards either so I cannot be a fanboy of any country.
I don't lean on Tanks or Aircrafts, but I try to see both sides of the case and go with my opinion, which still stands the P-63 should be added eventually with a perk cost.