Author Topic: Water Bombers  (Read 4505 times)

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Water Bombers
« on: August 25, 2013, 09:17:13 AM »
 :airplane: In view of the damageing forest fires burning now in the western U.S., I thought it might of interest to view some of the "fire fighters" with wings and a little of the history of aerial water bombing! Airtankers or water bombers are fixed-wing aircraft fitted with tanks that can be filled on the ground at an air tanker base or, in the case of flying boats and amphibious aircraft, by skimming water from lakes, reservoirs, or large rivers.


 


PBY Catalina flying boat
Various aircraft have been used over the years for firefighting. In 1947, shortly after World War Two ended, the United States Air Force and United States Forest Service did an experiment in which World War Two aircraft dropped water bombs similar to those used in wartime napalm attacks. It was not found successful, and internal water tanks were found the solution.[6] Though World War II and Korean War-era bombers were for a long time the mainstay of the aerial firefighting fleet, and are still in use newer purpose-built tankers are coming online. The smallest are the Single Engine Air Tankers (SEATs). These are agricultural sprayers that generally drop about 800 US gallons (3,000 l) of water or retardant. An example is the Airtractor AT-802F, which can deliver around 800 US gallons (3,000 l) of water or fire retardant solution each drop. Another is the Ukrainan Antonov An-2 biplane which can be fitted with floats that can scoop water from the surface of a body of water. An advantage of the biplane is that it has a lower stall speed than a monoplane meaning it a can fly more slowly over a fire which enhances the accuracy of water or retardant drops. Medium aircraft include the S-2 Tracker (retrofitted with turboprop engines as the S-2T) as used by the California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection (CDF), as well as Conair Group Inc. of Abbotsford, British Columbia, while the Douglas DC-4, the DC-7, the Lockheed C-130 Hercules, P-2V Neptune, Lockheed P-3 Orion and, commercial equivalent, the L188 Electra as used by Air Spray Ltd., of Red Deer, Alberta and others have been used as heavy tankers.



The largest aerial firefighter currently in use is a Boeing 747 aerial firefighter, known as the Evergreen Supertanker that can carry 24,000 US gallons (90,800 l) fed by a pressurized drop system. The Supertanker entered service for the first time in 2009, fighting a fire in Cuenca, Spain. The tanker made its first American operation on August 31, 2009 at the Oak Glen Fire.



The next largest aerial firefighters currently in use include two converted Martin Mars flying boats in British Columbia (one of which was brought to southern California in September 2007 to help battle the wildfires there). Each Martin Mars can carry approximately 7,200 US gallons (27,300 l) of water or fire retardant each, and the Tanker 910, a converted McDonnell Douglas DC-10 that can carry 12,000 US gallons (45,400 l) of water or retardant. The Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations operates convertible-to-cargo IL-76 airtankers that can carry up to 15,000 US gallons (56,800 l) but have been operating with 11,000 US gallons (41,600 l) tanking systems, and a few of Beriev Be-200 amphibians.

Bombardier's Dash 8 Q Series aircraft are the basis of new, next-generation air tankers. Cascade Aerospace has converted two pre-owned Q400s to act as part-time water bomber and part-time transport for France's Sécurité Civile, one of which is registered F-ZBMC, while Neptune Aviation is converting a pre-owned Q300 as a prototype to augment their P2V aircraft. Air Spray Aviation is also in the process of converting a BAe146 to the role of air tanker at its maintenance facility in Chico, California. Another modern-era passenger jet now being considered for conversion to aerial firefighting in the US, is the McDonnell Douglas MD-80 series.



Similar in configuration to the World War II–era PBY Catalina, the Canadair CL-215 Scooper, and Bombardier CL-415 SuperScooper are designed and built specifically for firefighting. The "Super Scoopers" are not common in the United States where only 2 operate seasonally in southern California. Los Angeles County leases two CL-415s from the Province of Quebec during the fall when the Santa Ana winds are at their worst. 6 American owned CL-215s operate for various State and Federal agencies. Critics of scoopers in the US claim that there is not enough suitable water in fire prone states. CL-215s have been employed with success in North Carolina, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Washington, Alaska, Northern Idaho, and Monta
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline SIK1

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3699
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2013, 10:42:52 AM »
Here's one parked at the lake a few years ago. It's really awesome to see, but not a good thing when it's here.



RDD is a service base for the fire bombers so I see the land based aircraft flying out all summer long.
444th Air Mafia since Air Warrior
Proudly flying with VF-17

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG54

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2013, 11:21:00 AM »
Up in northern Cali, I saw a few b26's as water bombers a few years back
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2013, 11:57:43 AM »
Up in northern Cali, I saw a few b26's as water bombers a few years back

Old designation was A-26 so those don't think it was the original B-26..

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2013, 12:37:58 PM »
Old designation was A-26 so those don't think it was the original B-26..
Im pretty sure it was a B26. Not the A26.
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2013, 01:35:23 PM »
Im pretty sure it was a B26. Not the A26.

When the Martin B-26 was retired, the Douglas A-26 was redesignated as the B-26. Different airplanes, same designation.
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline SIK1

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3699
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2013, 02:33:13 PM »
Im pretty sure it was a B26. Not the A26.

It was the Douglas A26 Invader that was used as the water bombers not the Martin B26 Marauder. Like Widewing said the Invaders were re-designated B26 after WW2, (1948-1965) according to Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_A-26_Invader

They use to fly out of here (RDD) all the time until the late '90's
444th Air Mafia since Air Warrior
Proudly flying with VF-17

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG54

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2013, 02:48:33 PM »
Yep A26s were the firebombers.  Lots of them now being flown in warbird colors.

Check out the movie "Always".  Remake of the WW2 film "A Guy Named Joe" based around fire bombers including an A26.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2013, 04:14:35 PM »
Beriev Be-200, belonging to the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations, filling water tanks in the Med Sea while in operation in 2010 Mount Carmel fire in Israel.

"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Tinkles

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2013, 09:07:04 PM »
When the Martin B-26 was retired, the Douglas A-26 was redesignated as the B-26. Different airplanes, same designation.

 Perhaps, make it so that if these are added (planes that can drop water) that they can reduce downtimes for hangers or objects on the field that are on fire? Lowering time by say... 4-5 minutes per drop?  Just a thought...   If they existed back then  :D

Tinkles

<<S>>
If we have something to show we will & do post shots, if we have nothing new to show we don't.
HiTech
Adapt , Improvise, Overcome. ~ HiTech
Be a man and shoot me in the back ~ Morfiend

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2013, 10:03:19 PM »
It was the Douglas A26 Invader that was used as the water bombers not the Martin B26 Marauder. Like Widewing said the Invaders were re-designated B26 after WW2, (1948-1965) according to Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_A-26_Invader

They use to fly out of here (RDD) all the time until the late '90's
Well im correct, but incorrect at the same time :rofl
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2013, 01:44:29 PM »
Well im correct, but incorrect at the same time :rofl
:airplane: The reason the B-26C was renamed by the defense dept. was because they were being used out of Thailand in the Vietnam war and the Thai's would not allow bombers to operate from their country, so the DD re-designated the B-26C "Invader", the A-26C and dropped, I believe, the designation "Invader".
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2013, 06:12:40 PM »
That doesn't make sense earl. The A-26 was the original designation of the a/c.

In June of 1948, the Air Force decided that it no longer needed light attack bombers, and the Attack designation category was officially eliminated. The designation of the two Invader types was changed to B-26B and B-26C respectively. There was no danger of confusion with the Martin B-26 Marauder, since that aircraft was by that time out of service. (but it seems there is confusion today :devil)

Offline SIK1

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3699
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2013, 06:27:32 PM »
Thailand wouldn't allow bombers to be based in their country. The US wanted to base B-26/A-26 Invaders in Thailand. so the US changed the designation back to A-26, and walla presto chango not a bomber.  :aok
444th Air Mafia since Air Warrior
Proudly flying with VF-17

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG54

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2013, 12:50:56 AM »
Thailand wouldn't allow bombers to be based in their country. The US wanted to base B-26/A-26 Invaders in Thailand. so the US changed the designation back to A-26, and walla presto chango not a bomber.  :aok
Thus how i am incorrect but slightly correct as well
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle