God bless Texas

[Arlo]

Think you have me quite confused. I don’t support the destruction of our democratic process at all. That would be Antifa, BLM among others.

Now you're on the hook to provide valid example. How are anti-fascists and 'Black Lives Matter' protestors destroying the democratic process (akin to a coup such as Trump and his supporters appear to support, by and large)? And what others?

[CptTrips]

You’re hatred is extreme.

You are underestimating.

My hatred for the seditious traitors like Trump and his minions that are considering declaring martial law, overthrowing our system of election, and installing a Putin like authoritarian, has no measurable upper limit.  Extreme or otherwise.

If you were even half of an American, you would feel the same.

[DmonSlyr]

The sore loser is Trump and his merry band of Trumptards that have tried and still trying to destroy our electoral process with unproven claims of fraud.

So RotBaron, why are you so un-American that you willingly support the destruction of our democratic process?

2 years and 75 million dollars later for the Mueller report, + an impeachment for a call to a country where Biden is indicted now, trying to put a general NSA in prison, putting his fired campaign manager in prison and not podesta, calling Trump a Russian everyday to undermine his campaign and presidency with fake Russian dossier, and somehow we are the sore losers? We have an incredible amount of accusations with affidavits and mathematical data by professionals that the democrats never had. We have far more than they ever had.

Yet we are the sore losers?

Biden did not win this election fairly. If he did, the democrats wouldn't be hiding like they are.

[Arlo]

Deluded dufus.

[Busher]

Deluded dufus.

The oath includes a promise to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. And yet he along with two Qanon supporters, Sidney Powell and Michael Flynn, have discussed using the military to overturn the election.
These numbnuts can't provide any credible evidence that this election was in any way illegitimate.
How does this kind of behavior gain support, and for that matter, how does it fall short of high treason?

[RotBaron]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/georgia-recount-monitor-filmed-workers-moving-ballots-to-biden-tray_3626390.html

Clearly see what she says happened in the video, they moved them into Biden’s.

How many videos of this do you need to see before you stop denying it?

[CptTrips]

How many videos of this do you need to see before you stop denying it?

Then you should have no problem winning a single federal court case proving wide-spread systemic fraud. 

Prove it in a court of law or go pound sand.

[Arlo]

Could it be that 'TDS' actually stands for 'Trumper Derangement Syndrome?'

[RotBaron]

Just from that one short video alone you can see exactly what she states happened.

Do you deny that in the video they are moved into Biden’s bin and then collected?

[CptTrips]

Just from that one short video alone you can see exactly what she states happened.

Do you deny that in the video they are moved into Biden’s bin and then collected?

Then you should have no problem winning a single federal court case proving wide-spread systemic fraud.

Prove it in a court of law or go pound sand.

[Ramesis]

Now you're on the hook to provide valid example. How are anti-fascists and 'Black Lives Matter' protestors destroying the democratic process (akin to a coup such as Trump and his supporters appear to support, by and large)? And what others?

Good Lawd Arlo... have u not seen the news in the past 6 mos? Are u ok with the destruction of private businesses and the attacking private citizens minding their own business?
Seems like anarchy to me... not the democratic process 

[Toad]

The Texas suit was rejected by the US Supreme Court on the basis of lack of standing. The issue raised was not adjudicated; the validity or invalidity of the plaintiffs case was not resolved. I am guessing this is why Trump has filed essentially the same suit as the injured party, hoping that the SC will acknowledge his standing. We will see.

So, to review the gist of that Texas lawsuit: The US Constitution grants powers to state legislatures to set election rules. This is indisputably true.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court unilaterally changed the voting laws passed by the Pennsylvania state legislature, The sis also indisputably true.

In particular, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court unilaterally extended the deadline to receive mail-in ballots by three days after Election Day, even without postmarks. This is also indisputably true.

Indisputably the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did not have the authority to do this under the US Constitution. Therefore, ballots received after the original deadline determined by the Pennsylvania legislature should not count.

Similar situations apply to changes to voting laws made in Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin.

Trump continues his attempt to prove this in court. One would think every US citizen would want the voting laws obeyed.

Right?

[TyFoo]

Indisputably the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did not have the authority to do this under the US Constitution. Therefore, ballots received after the original deadline determined by the Pennsylvania legislature should not count.

Similar situations apply to changes to voting laws made in Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin.

One would think every US citizen would want the voting laws obeyed.

Right?

Exactly where in the Constitution does it say that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot do what they did? Where does it say in the Pennsylvania legislative laws that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot make a ruling on a dispute or clarify ambiguity? The very nature of State & Federal Supreme Courts is to evaluate and clarify laws. There is a reason why Government is broken down into 3 branches. So that there is a check and balance. Did that change?

According to 50+ judges there has been no evidence presented to merit changing anything. AG Barr reiterated that sentiment this morning in a News conference.

[Busher]

Indisputably the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did not have the authority to do this under the US Constitution. Therefore, ballots received after the original deadline determined by the Pennsylvania legislature should not count.


Trump continues his attempt to prove this in court. One would think every US citizen would want the voting laws obeyed.

Right?

No. Not right. The Federal Government has no jurisdiction in how sovereign States determine there method of voting. 21 States have used mail in voting for years prior to this 2020 election.
Texas had no standing in their objection as to how another State manages it's voting procedures.

[hitech]

Exactly where in the Constitution does it say that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot do what they did? Where does it say in the Pennsylvania legislative laws that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot make a ruling on a dispute or clarify ambiguity? The very nature of State & Federal Supreme Courts is to evaluate and clarify laws. There is a reason why Government is broken down into 3 branches. So that there is a check and balance. Did that change?

According to 50+ judges there has been no evidence presented to merit changing anything. AG Barr reiterated that sentiment this morning in a News conference.

The SC made a ruling  to keep votes separate because the Pen SC was likely to be ruled against.

The executive ignored the ruling and did not separate the votes.

Just one of many issues where state exec and state courts counted illegal votes.
And the rulings were not interpreting they were substantial changes.

And even a states constitution can not limit a state legislature regarding national elections.

HiTech