Agree 100%, Perdue. But it does seem to me there used to be a time when facts and data held sway with more people. Not all, but more.
In one of your links,the myths about pit bulls pretty much lays it all out,although in a biased way.
In the 70’s the breed changed,or should I say breeds,there was much mixing done to produce a bigger badder dog.Back in the days of open dog fighting a man biter just wasn’t tolerated and when dog fighting was outlawed the dogs were mainly bred for temperament and the show ring. Ag`ain aggressive dogs weren’t tolerated in the show ring either.
I have bred a few best in show winners,had some of the dogs in my line go on to become top show dogs as that’s where my interest was. I’ve researched the history for years and have come to the conclusion that fighting breeds just aren’t the dog for everyone. They are a special type that will ignore common dog signals,with most breeds once a dog submits it’s over,fighting dogs ignore this and will continue.They have an extreme prey drive yet are sensitive to discipline. And as much as I trust my dogs I’d never leave a child unsupervised around one.
All dog can and will bite,fighting breeds just happen to be extremely strong for their size but then any breed around 40 lbs or larger can inflict serious injuries. Personally I’m more wary of the mastif breeds,they are so large once they get you down there’s no getting back up.
One thing I tell people who are interested in getting this type of dog is to remember you have to be slightly smarter than then the dog,which is not often the case.