Someone has to help me understand "state's rights". The constitution guarantees personal freedoms doesn't it? So help me understand how a woman's right to control her own body can be infringed by the state (or anyone else). Isn't anything that happens between an individual and their Doctor considered to be privileged?
The issue is that some people are 100% sure (and will not have minds changed) that an unborn baby is a person, and the baby's right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is guaranteed by the Constitution. Other people are 100% sure (and will not have their minds changed) that an unborn baby is not yet a person, and the mother has the right to abortion as part of her right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
You can't convince either side to adopt the other side's point of view on that.
If it's an issue that the Constitution doesn't cover (and the Constitution doesn't define abortion, or whether that counts as murder or not, or whether or not a foetus counts as a person in terms of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", etc.), then Constitutionally, it is a matter for States. Not a matter for the Federal Government. That's my opinion. (But I am not an expert, just a person.) That's the Supreme Court's opinion. (But no matter what the Court decided, no matter what legal reasoning it used, a lot of people are going to be sure the Court got it wrong.)
When you have things determined by States, you at least have the right to move to another State.
When you have things determined by Federal Government, you have to move to another country (which is far more difficult). And you don't have the right to do that -- other countries can deny you from doing that.
I think it's much better as a State issue.