Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Im currently on the lookout for a 1995 E36 M3... cant seem to find what I want, but thats besides the point. Even the 3.0L M3 seems a bit lacking... the 3.2 (1996-1999) is better, and I havent driven an E46 M3... couldnt afford it even if I tried, so it doesnt really matter. Handling is great, brakes are "ok"... what the car REALLY needs is a supercharger. Bump that 240HP to about 320 or so and Id be happy. I just think the E36 M3 is a beautiful car and it would make a slightly more exciting than normal daily driver.
Too bad, I just sold my nicely SCCA B-stock prepped '95 e36m3 back in Dec. Personally, I'm partial to the 3.0L motor...it revs much more freely and doesn't run out of steam at the top end like the 3.2L. Plus the 3.0L cars are OBDI which are much easier to mod than OBDII cars. The 3.2s have a little more torque down low, which is great if your dirving around town, but if you are tracking or autoxing, the 3.0L is the way to go.
Also, I always thought the brakes were FANTASTIC. If I recall R&T got one to haul from 60-0 in 110ft! The thing has 12in rotors!
And rather than the supercharger, I'd get that new Schrick cam kit from Turner. It comes with the Conforti matching chip, intake, HFM, and injectors. 310hp naturally aspirated and no extra weight or drag on the engine. Plus the cam kit costs a lot less than the SC. if you want crazy hp add a 50 or 75 shot of nitrous to the cam kit set up and see 400hp.
All the e36m3's have some trouble areas to watch out for, but Rip is right that some of the early '95s had more problems than other M3's. But those were pretty much just the '95s that were actually built in '94. Those with Feb '95 build dates and after are no worse than the 96+ cars. Check the driver's door jam for the build date.