Me262 flew more combat sorties and shot more aircraft down and were produced in greater numbers than the F4UC.
For that matter the 163 probably comes close to matching the F4Uc. I dont see Allied types saying anything about us having that in AH.
Beans? the armoured car is pointless? we have an allied M8 armoured car so why not have the axis counterpart? thepuma was faster and fielded a 50mm gun which makes it a far better choice than the M8 we have.
True Id rather have a light tank but then things become unballanced again meaning the allies would need a similar light tank.The puma was purely so both sides have a fast armoured scout.
As for your choice of M60 you must be crazy, It had a terrible open turret configeration that would mean your m60 is totally exposed to aircraft mg's of even the smallest caliber.
A matchup or match for the panzer 4 not a totally different m60 please!
M36 with the 90mm was incedibly rare and would have to be perked i think to stop it being used constantly to kill tigers.No one will use a tiger if it costs 50 perks and anyone can kill it for free with a quick m36 spawn.
We need the sherman M4 which although far less effective as a tank it was the most common type on the battlefields of Europe.
We need a tank with 75mm or 76mm or similar FIRST.Then we can think about tanks like the m60. M60 would be useless in all scenarios apart from very late war ones which again makes it a poor choice. One thing I think AH should always reflect is the fact that generally the Germans fielded the most advanced tanks of their day but the fielded them in very small numbers.Tanks like the tiger were far in advance of the allied tanks it generally faced but it was outnumbered.AH arenas need to reflect this and it seems HTC have given it a perk cost to reflect this.
If we do get the sherman i would say it should be free to use whereas the panzerIV should have a small cost(in scenarios etc) to reflect availability.What we need to have is large numbers of allied sherman tank platoons facing smaller numbers of panzers.That would be more similar to the real battles at least.I liked one persons idea of having a sherman formation so you get 3 tanks to use like the bombers whereas the panzer would not get this.when you fire the other 2 drones take a pot shot at your target with you
If HTC skips the common allied tanks and adds a very late war allied tank with a better than 88mm gun I think id stop using the GV's altogether. Ive no interest in simulating a totally unreal battlefield. I want to see similar stuff to games like panzer commander and the best game ever made 'sherman m4' hehe. it was such a basic game but it was the first time i played a computer game that simulated the tank we all built as models when we were kids.Later we can add the firefly or similar but please at first lets have the most produced tank of them all.
Does anyone else see HTC adding russian planes before some of those on karnaks list?
I would be suprised if they did.Theres so few russian aircraft at the moment that in order to fully simulate the russian front they would need to add loads of aircraft we currently dont have.
The western front has the most aiircraft covered. I'd guess this is where they will concentrate their efforts and that might even mean the russian and japanese aircraft are the last models to be updated in AH2.
I justhad a horrible thought. Are HTC going to have AH2 Tod a proper axis vs allies setup? God i hope they are! If it is setup like a 3 country war with any side using any aircraft I think that will be the final straw for me. I couldnt stand a career mode set up with 109s shooting down ju88s!