Author Topic: Beating the dead horse  (Read 550 times)

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Beating the dead horse
« Reply #30 on: November 24, 1999, 05:34:00 PM »
It's obvious that both the La-5 and the 205 suffer greatly in comparision to other aircraft (especially since neither plane seems to have utilized drop tanks). I'm all for realism in the flight models, damage and gunnery models...but "fuel realism" is going to be subjective in a sim regardless of how you do it.

The proof is in the fact that these planes didn't utilize drop tanks. It wasn't required to fufill there missions or they'd have them available. Since this is an artificial application of real world aircraft some flexibility in range should be allowed for short legged craft (outside of historical scenario's ..maybe) to accurately simulate their real world applications.

hmble

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline leonid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
Beating the dead horse
« Reply #31 on: November 24, 1999, 11:24:00 PM »
Minotaur,
Sorry, but no large-scale production Soviet aircraft used drop tanks during WWII.

------------------
129 IAP VVS RKKA


ingame: Raz