Author Topic: Best nonperked planes Top 5  (Read 4882 times)

Offline TimRas

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 560
OK, how about this comparison...
« Reply #30 on: November 03, 2003, 12:35:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Widewing
I agree with Wadke, the best overall, non-perked fighter is the F6F-5 Hellcat. Simply do the comparisons.



Spit IX outturns, outaccelerates, outclimbs, and outguns the F6F. It is even slightly faster at most altitudes. The N1K2 has also most of these advantages over the F6F.

Not that the F6F is a bad plane. But it is not the best either, IMHO.

Offline Rutilant

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1352
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #31 on: November 03, 2003, 01:14:21 AM »
Blackout turns at 450 my pasty white arse!

Full control to 600? what sim are YOU flying? :eek:

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8804
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #32 on: November 03, 2003, 01:17:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
These are significant numbers Widewing, and considering that every plane in the "top five" with the possible exception of the Typhoon out accelerates the F6F in level flight the F6F would be a death-trap at 20K facing any of these planes.


Somehow you seem to think that absolute maximums are especially significant. Perhaps they are for some people, but generally speaking it matters little to me if the enemy is in a 109G-10 or A6M2. Either way, I will not allow him to use his on paper advantages.

Sustained climb is useful for avoiding a fight, it means little if you're already engaged. Going vertical with a Co-E Hellcat isn't the best choice, simply because for the first 2-3k, the Hellcat's superior zoom (momentum) means even the G-10 will initially lose ground. It will be dead long before sustained climb is a factor.

Understanding momentum and its importance to energy convergence is valuable. Dive acceleration is also important. A fighter that might have only average acceleration in level flight, just might be a monster in a dive. I've tested the F6F-6 against the Tempest and La-7 offline for dive acceleration, doing the same test described below. Neither of those can accelerate from 200 to 450 mph in a dive as fast as the F6F.

I posted the following elsewhere on this BBS two days ago:

Early this tour I was flying a sortie in the Havoc near a fairly large furball. It was nearly dark and I was just below 8k (ground elevation was around 2K). I spot a 109 heading my way, about 1k higher. I was slightly nose-up when we passed on the merge, speed around 300 mph. We both reversed, but I got around much faster and the 109 went nose-low to avoid the coming deflection shot. I turned onto his 6 about 1.1k behind, accelerating rapidly nose-down. I had 425 mph in a heartbeat. Clearly surprised to see my A-20 actually closing, the 109 did what most of them do, he went vertical. So did I. Still the range came down. I was at just 700 yards back when he pulled thru and headed down again. It's here that I can finally identify the 109 as a G-10. As before, I followed, and once again he could not open the gap. Up he goes into a loop, the big Havoc eating distance and getting ever closer. This time he stays in the dive longer. I ease into a far less steep dive headed for where I figure he'll be when he finally pulls out. Rolling inverted I watch him as he eases out and runs along just above the ground. The angle of my dive was just about perfect and he crosses under my nose at 300 yards. One short burst pulverizes the 109.

I did some simple off-line testing of the A-20's dive acceleration and zoom climb abilities. My criteria was this; climb to 15k, level at 200 mph. Go to full throttle while rolling inverted, pull through into vertical dive (a simple spit-S). Record the time required to get to 450 mph. This not only gauges dive acceleration but initial roll rate as well. Go throttle-up and begin roll when clock starts. I tested the La-7, Bf 109G-10, P-51D, Fw 190D-9, P-47D-30 and Tempest. Of these, the Tempest was the fastest by a very small margin, followed by the P-47D-30 and La-7 neck and neck. The other three were only fractions of a second behind. There is not enough difference to change the outcome should any one of them be chasing the any other of the group and already be in gun range. That done, I tried the A-20. Guess what? Despite its poor rate of roll, it beat all the fighters to 450 mph, by more than the entire spread between the whole group. As some have discovered to their great shock, you cannot escape out of gun range by diving from the A-20. It will run you down and kill you before you can generate enough speed to force the A-20 to back off. Let me repeat that, because I've heard a lot of whining and accusations of cheating over channel 1; It will run you down and kill you before you can generate enough speed to force the A-20 to back off.

I also used the same group to test zoom climb. This time, each aircraft was flown to 300 mph, level at 100 ft. Once the speed was stable, the throttle was chopped to idle and auto-climb engaged at the same time (for me, that means pushing a button on the throttle when the lever hits the aft stop). I added the Mosquito to the group for this test. The objective is to determine what aircraft gains the most altitude based solely upon its momentum.

All of the single engine fighters gained about 1,100 ft before nosing over, except the P-47D-30 which gained a tad more than 1,200 ft. The Mossie gained about 50 feet more than the Jug. However, the A-20 zoomed up past 1,700 ft, for a gain slightly over 1,600 feet! So what does that mean in combat? It means don't maneuver in the vertical with a Co-E A-20 unless you can out-turn it or are well out of gun range.

What's the point? The point is, never assume anything. Here's an example of what an inferior plane can do if the pilot understands his aircraft's capabilities. Tonight, a Rook took up an A-20 to defend a field be swarmed by Bish (A167, BigIlses). He managed to kill a Dora, 2 La-7s, P-51D, A6M5, Spit9 and a P-38. That's three of the 5 on the list. He finally lost the A-20 when another La-7 went for an HO.. He shot off the Lavochkin's wing but collided with the wreckage. He hadn't even been pinged before the collision. Every engagement began with the A-20 being lower and a heck of a lot slower than the enemy. Indeed, the A-20 is perfect bait. Now, if it's possible to handle these guys with a bomber, how worried should you be if you're flying a Hellcat?

The question was, "what are the best non-perked planes in the MA?"

Let's consider something besides pure speed, OK?

Jabo: Fw 190D-9 not of much value, limited to one bomb. La-7; useless. Typhoon; carries less ordnance than the F6F, although it has better guns. That's easily overcome by the six HVARS on the F6F. P-51D, exact same load as the F6F, but far less durable in the face of field ack or gunfire. Bf 109G-10, same as Dora.

Fighter: F6F turns circles around the "top five". It has better dive acceleration and zoom climb. It's far more durable than any of the others too. It has the best stall characteristics of the bunch by a significant margin. It's nearly impossible to pull off the wings in a high-speed dive and pullout. The F6F also has terrific high-speed control and handling, two things the G-10, La-7 and Typhoon lack. In exchange, the F6F is slower than all of the "top five", and they also have the edge in level acceleration and sustained climb. Only the Mustang has greater range.

If we include all the criteria of what constitutes a top five aircraft, I can't see how you could possibly exclude the F6F-5, or the P-38 for than matter. Moreover, I can see no reason to include the La-7 , Dora or 109G-10. They are simply "one trick ponies"; go like hell, shoot, go like hell some more. The problem is that some of you guys have a very narrow view of what constitutes the "best non-perked plane."

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #33 on: November 03, 2003, 01:20:48 AM »
Hey widewing lets duel in hellcats in the DA, I wanna fight somebody good. Lets do it right now. :)

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #34 on: November 03, 2003, 01:59:40 AM »
Mr. Widewing, why do you think the F6F never saw service in the ETO? Why do you think the P-38 had such limited success in the ETO? The same reason why these planes were so successful against their slower Japanese opponents in the PTO; speed and climb.

Why do you think I would even engage your F6F in an equal E state? I would just keep my distance gaining more E climbing above you before engaging. If at any time I considered you to be a threat I would extend and build up more E again. Against me in a 109G10 you would never get to fight on your terms, I would use my plane's strengths and force you to play my game, and I could disengage anytime I want. That's what makes the F6F inferior to the "top five", against a pilot who knows his plane and knows ACM the F6F is a death-trap. You can of course furball the F6F very successfully because of the abilities you mentioned, but against a "hunter" you're toast ... or ignored.

The F6F can carry the same ord as the P-51, but which plane has the best chance of reaching the target without being intercepted, the 380 mph F6F or the 435 mph P-51? Which plane has the best chance of getting away on the deck after dropping ord, the 320 mph F6F or the 360 mph P-51? The P-51 is clearly the better Jabo of the two.

EDIT: The 1941 model 109F4 is a very good match for the F6F in the fighter role ... except that the 109 is faster, climbs better and turns better at all altitudes of course. In performance the F6F is almost 4 years behind the 109G10. ;)
« Last Edit: November 03, 2003, 02:07:19 AM by GScholz »
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
      • Blog
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #35 on: November 03, 2003, 02:37:01 AM »
Yes in furball Spit 5 is good, F6F I think too.... But when we talking about good fighting startegy - speed is most important, then climb and then acceleration and fireporwer an then turn ratio.
We know well all next planes generations are faster climbs better and turnw worster why? Because speed is finaly suprior factor in combat. The slow one in offenceive. I'm not talking that F6F or Spit 9 can't kill fast planes if they make mistakes - especialy at MA when you see a lot of furballs. But if you use right tactics faster planes will be suprior
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #36 on: November 03, 2003, 03:17:57 AM »
Co-alt, Co-E and particularly at high alt, I would face any of the selected planes in a Spit IX. No question about it, - Spit IX is the best :D
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #37 on: November 03, 2003, 03:46:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
Mr. Widewing, why do you think the F6F never saw service in the ETO?


Wrong :)

http://www.rcaf.com/aircraft/database/hellcat.htm

Quote
Hellcats first saw operational service with the Royal Navy during anti-shipping strikes off the coast of Norway


tss tss ;)

Offline mold

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 305
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #38 on: November 03, 2003, 08:06:08 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Widewing
Good SA is everything. Why do you think so many fly the fast fighters, especially new players? Cheap insurance for when their SA isn't very good. Of course, there are riders attached to that policy which states that coverage is not extended to encounters with Hellcats piloted by Mathman or Wadke or Hooligan and a few others listed in the fine print.


Fine, you're a great pilot.  Doesn't mean the F6F belongs in the top 5. :)  Obviously pilot skill plays a huge factor unless we are talking about P-26's against X-Wings.

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
      • Blog
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #39 on: November 03, 2003, 08:18:56 AM »
Ok, Lets stop this,

We are not talking about most popular plane or dweeb plane or experienced pilots plane. My fried from the squadron flyes Spit 5 and lands with lot of kills and enjoyes this fight. He likes turn and burn fight. Does it put the plane into top 5? No.

We can talk a lot about expirience of pilots and it is true that Spit 5 can kill Mustang easily if Mustang makes mistake. That is like I killed once Spit 14 in Ju87 Stuka when it tryed to turnfight me ;)

This is well known what is supriority. Yes planes could be good but not equal in their perfomances to other better planes.

So give me a favor don't put to this therad planes like Spit IX or N1K of F6F - they good for furballing in MA but they can not be compared to high perfomance planes.
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline mos

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 219
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #40 on: November 03, 2003, 11:49:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
Why do you think the P-38 had such limited success in the ETO? The same reason why these planes were so successful against their slower Japanese opponents in the PTO; speed and climb.

It was because they had trouble adapting the engines to the bloody english weather.

Don't underestimate the ability of the 38 to climb.  I'd wager about a third of my kills come from forcing a stall in someone who has done just that.  I'd be interested in seeing how the 38 does in WideWing's momentum climb tests.

Offline Tarmac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #41 on: November 03, 2003, 11:55:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by artik
This is well known what is supriority. Yes planes could be good but not equal in their perfomances to other better planes.

So give me a favor don't put to this therad planes like Spit IX or N1K of F6F - they good for furballing in MA but they can not be compared to high perfomance planes.


I think that's exactly what's being argued.  You said "discussion" in your initial post; people are discussing.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #42 on: November 03, 2003, 02:07:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Angus
Co-alt, Co-E and particularly at high alt, I would face any of the selected planes in a Spit IX. No question about it, - Spit IX is the best :D


Hehe, I would actually agree with this statement. Co-alt and Co-E I would not engage a Spit9. 1 on 1 the Spit9 is a formidable opponent at altitude which is why I tend to ignore them, and that's also why the Spit9 don't make it to the "top five" in my book; it can be ignored.

In a Co-alt, Co-E fight between the best 5 109G10 pilots and the best 5 Spit9 pilots, my money is on the 109's.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1910
      • Blog
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #43 on: November 03, 2003, 02:21:48 PM »
A lot of players forget that you should compare not 1 vs 1 fight. But flight of 2 groups of players that know how to coaperate one with other - clean up their 6 etc...

Today I flew in 109g10 over 6-7 planes that was in furball flying over base and vulching - most of them US navy planes and few Spits - they just could do nothing to me. twice I got Spit on my 6 at distace of 500 yards and what - little dive - grab speed and it is far... far away. then climb and return back for next hunting up to Ifinished my ammo ;)

Slow planes just could be ignored.
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Best nonperked planes Top 5
« Reply #44 on: November 03, 2003, 02:48:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rutilant
Blackout turns at 450 my pasty white arse!

Full control to 600? what sim are YOU flying? :eek:


A virtual Messerschmitt/Bayerische Flugzeugwerke Bf109-G10. If you trim manually the 109G10 is fully controllable in pitch at 500 mph, but roll will be a bit sluggish. I didn't say it has "full control" to 600 mph, I said it didn't lock completely up untill approx. 600 mph, meaning you still have some control. Manual trim is alpha and omega in the 109G10.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."