I am with Mini D on this one, I suspect her motives and her timing. Supporting Veterans these days is a popular move, too bad there wasn't more support for the military, their families and the Vets when the Clintons ruled the White House.
Interesting that there is some informed opposition to her move, and I have to believe at least some of them know what they are talking about and if there are benefits to be realized from the changes to be made. She seems to not know the details, but wants to meddle.
"We are concerned your amendment may completely stall the CARES process and prohibit VA from making the necessary changes to improve its health care system and services for veteran patients," said David Gorman, DAV executive director.
Does anyone think the Disabled American Veterans executive director isn't up to speed on the issue, hasn't weighed benefits versus disadvantages? Does anyone think the Disabled American Veterans executive director isn't interested in the Veterans best interest medically but Hillary is???
His motives: Health Care for Veterans
Her motives: Getting votes, photo ops, good soundbites, future run for President.
Who's motives do you really trust?
dago
Here is an interesting website:
A view on Hillary (somewhat slanted but untrue?)