Originally posted by Kieran
Stop it, Holden. The shades account user's argument falls apart at the slightest scrutiny, you don't want to do that. Let "Nakhui" continue on...
What exactly is my arguement?
Am I a former Bush White House aide exposing what the White House was planning?
It's interesting how blind many of the people on this board are...
They choose to only see the facts and discuss the arguements which support their beliefs on this matter.
When the Washintong Post exposed Nixon... as a result of "Deep Throats' Revelations....
How many Republicans couldn't believe the truth about the Water Gate cover up?
When Oliver North was exposed... how many couldn't believe the truth that people high in the government would break the law by selling weapons to terrorists?
This is not an Area 51 UFO alien theory...
And the exposure of the CIA agent.. .was that a fabucation?
Someone in the white house intentionally broke the law...
This is not the liberals fabricating conspiracy theories...
Novak admits he got his information from a high level government official in the White House - Novak is NOT a liberal.
O'Neil is either a liar... or he's telling the truth.
Regardless of what he says... if he has the paper trail to back up his statments... it sheds more light upon what's really going on in the White House...
And why US Military Intelligence which Bush proported he had has failed to lead directly to WMD in Iraq
And the recent find of 150 shells is just a serendiputous event.. which Bush supporters will desparately cling to and say "See we we're right!"
It's just a matter of time before a special prosecutor will be asked to investigate this matter.
It's hard to believe in lies... isn't it... the more the facts disprove people's beliefs the angrier they get...
It's just some Bush hating liberals stirring up a conspiracy... isn't?
That's easier to believe... then where the facts of the matter are leading...