Author Topic: Spitfire IX overmodeled??  (Read 39020 times)

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #225 on: January 27, 2004, 06:33:17 PM »
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #226 on: January 27, 2004, 06:37:22 PM »
Air superiority and air supremacy are not synonymous. It is obviously a common mistake, just look at this thread.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #227 on: January 27, 2004, 06:42:29 PM »
Here let me repost this AND let me once again say it.  The Allies had Air Superiority from Mar ' 44 til the End of the War in Europe.  In Only a few instances though did they have Air Supremacy.  Normandy was one of those times.  Right after Bodenplatte may have been another.  The last few months of the war where another.

Here then lets examine the definition of Air Supremacy we both agree on.

In Normandy:

"Air supremacy is defined as the condition when the enemy air force is in-capable of effective interference."

This was definately the case in Normandy.

"Under the condition of air supremacy, the air commander employs all of his aircraft at will."

This was also the case for the Allies.


"Through the complete destruction of the enemy air forces, this condition is the ultimate goal of an air campaign. "

This is arguable but I contend that while the LW still had planes and pilots it did not have a force that could do any damage to the allies in Normandy. Therefore the LW destruction as an effective fighting force was complete.

"It may occur however, through the establishment of a diplomatic “no-fly zone”."

The Normandy landings may not have been a Diplomatic "No-Fly" zone but they were unarguably a LW "No-Fly" zone.

Three out of four conditions unarguable and one that you can debate depending on your whether you take a tatical view or strategic. In my book it meets the definition.

Crumpp

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #228 on: January 27, 2004, 07:29:02 PM »
For starters the term "Air Superiority" and "Air Supremacy" when used by authors of books on WW2 history, is interchangeable. What some post war USAF manual says is quite off topic, so you guys can end that arguement. English as a language is no that rigid.

Cherry picking one air campaign from 1944 as the "real end" to the LW is a flawed concept imho, there were too many pressures on the LW from many sources to pick one as the main cause. If I had to pick a "LW cannot win" date, I would pick December 1943, after that they were not going to have the #s of pilots and a/c to effectively repel a bombing offensive, or an invasion of France.

The LW continued to have impressive # of ac "on the roster"....but that was not the same as operational examples. My #s:

Luftlotte Reich as of June 1st 1944: 788 single engined day fighters of which 472 were operational. 203 twin engined day fighters of which 83 were operational. 991 day fighters of which 555 were ready for action. They continued to get deliveries of new ac in quantity, no doubt, but the bases, air crews, supplies and other infrastructure to sustain them was the problem.

Ah the Spitfire. Yes indeed. Its essentially a Spitfire F. IX with a merlin 61, and its #s match as close as other AH fighters. It has an upgraded E wing which was available either new or as a modification in 1944.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2004, 07:42:14 PM by Squire »
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline mosca

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 169
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #229 on: January 27, 2004, 08:50:12 PM »
LOL, GScholz, your defense reminds me of the Black Knight in Monty Python & the Holy Grail!

King Arthur: Look, you stupid bastard. You've got no arms left.
Black Knight: Yes I have.
King Arthur: Look.
Black Knight: Just a flesh wound.

LOL! Wait while I get more popcorn!


Mosca

Offline gripen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1914
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #230 on: January 27, 2004, 11:39:53 PM »
Well, it can be argued forever if the Allies had the full air superiority over Normandy. The LW could still launch quite large number of sorties there with questionable effect, some of them certainly got through. Otherwise the allies were then still quite far from overall air superiority in europe despite what ever definition we want to use, the LW could still cause large losses to allies.

gripen

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #231 on: January 28, 2004, 12:03:31 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by gripen
Well, it can be argued forever if the Allies had the full air superiority over Normandy. The LW could still launch quite large number of sorties there with questionable effect, some of them certainly got through. Otherwise the allies were then still quite far from overall air superiority in europe despite what ever definition we want to use, the LW could still cause large losses to allies.

gripen


What large losses are those?  Compared to the sorties being flown, I can't find much more then a 1% loss rate for the Allies and that includes flak losses.

Coulda, shoulda, woulda,  didn't.  What might have been, doesn't really count does it?

Once again, the Allied Air Forces dictated the targets, the timing, the place etc of the attacks.  Allied armies moved freely in daylight. German armies did not.

Talking about what the Luftwaffe could have done is pointless, cause they didn't do it.

Dan/Slack
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline gripen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1914
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #232 on: January 28, 2004, 04:09:27 AM »
Guppy35,
There are several cases during summer 1944 where the LW could put up strong resistance and cause large losses if they really needed (like Ploesti). Anyway,  these cases disapear to statistics due to scale of the air war. If we use as strict definition for air superiority as USAF appear to use, then the allies could reach only local superiority during summer.

My response was actually  about Crumpp's statement that the allies had allready won air superiority over europe in March. This statement is not supported by statistics (absolute and relative, sources USAAF statistical digest and BBSU) because losses of the heavies (by enemy fighters) actually increased in April. The loss rate was then about 3,5% per sortie (about 75% of them by enemy fighters).

gripen

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #233 on: January 28, 2004, 05:31:08 AM »
Gripen, what's the point? It's like arguing with children. Just let it go buddy.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #234 on: January 28, 2004, 06:25:01 AM »
The LW did often launch large gaggles of fighters (on many occations both 109's and 190's) in the summer of 1944. My great uncle was flying a P51 at the time, and once he wound up in a situation with 12 Mustangs facing about 50 German planes.
Now where is the supremacy in that condition?
Anyway, this debate is really haggling about pennies....:D
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #235 on: January 28, 2004, 07:20:53 AM »
Here Gripen,

Not only is my conclusion backed up by the facts IT is the Popular historical view.

Here is site from the USAF and one from a History Professor AND another Historian.


http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/apj/apj94/mccrabb2.html

http://www.cebudanderson.com/europe.htm

http://www.butler98.freeserve.co.uk/thtrlosses.htm


Enjoy, but make sure you have a nice soothing cup of tea when you read it!

Crumpp

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #236 on: January 28, 2004, 08:56:36 AM »
if the allies had air supremacy so early why didnt they just go drop paratroops on the reichstag in 1943? :D
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #237 on: January 28, 2004, 09:40:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
Gripen, what's the point? It's like arguing with children. Just let it go buddy.


Since we don't agree with you, that makes us children? LOL a priceless response on your part.  

I'll be sure and pass it on to my kids.

Expressing your supremacy again are you? :)

Dan/Slack
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline gripen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1914
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #238 on: January 28, 2004, 10:19:28 AM »
Crumpp,
Statistics do not support your sources, nor USSBS, nor BBSU.

gripen

Offline Red Tail 444

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2497
      • http://www.redtail.org
Spitfire IX overmodeled??
« Reply #239 on: January 28, 2004, 02:32:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by storch
Hmmm my reference books states

A6M5 1194 miles
wow


Only in friendly airspace:lol