There must be some among you, im sure not responded to this thread yet as most who have are very cowardly, that could possibly have the balls to challenge these inconsistencies given by our government and what has been reported to have happened by major news media, fire fighters, eye-witnesses, and even the owner himself..
Cowardly? I have spoken my thoughts clearly to you, without dodging or obfuscation. SO... you are convinced #7 was imploded.
As Grunherz asked, was it set to go before 9/11, or was it rigged on that day? You must realize someone would have noticed those people rigging the building either way, not to mention all the attendant rigging and explosives. The time it would have taken to do the job would have taken days. But you can ignore that, and hang your argument on the word "pull".
Your basic physics argument was totally defeated too... you assumed one second per floor- a silly thing to assume anyway, and should never have been taken for granted- and ignored other relevant factors. What do you suppose the kinetic energy of a couple of million tons of debris falling at an initial rate of 32 feet/second would be? Can you show me a picture of any I-beam on the planet that can stand up to that type of force? How would that force be dissipated down the structure, impact after impact? Just basic physics, but I'll allow professional engineers could explain it better than I could. I'll also allow the possibility I might be in error, but I didn't see any such details factoring into your analysis.
What is really silly is you are demanding an exact explanation for every single aspect of the event, as if it were a known science. Can you point me to the research on airliners colliding with skyscrapers, and the collatoral effects on surrounding buildings?
Bottom line: you WANT there to be a conspiracy. You were convinced from the beginning there was. These pieces of "evidence" merely confirmed what you already wanted to believe.
