Curval
Ok 22 square miles is small. You made your point.
I am lucky, I live in North Dakota where there is a LOT of public land available.
Some of it forested, some wetlands, some upland. As a result there is a LOT of hunting available.
As for the english blokes. Well if you guys let your king take all the good land, & all the cirtters & you've not had the gumption to take the land back, well thats your choice then eh mate?
Let me ask you this. Are all your descendants living in the big wide open Australian lands feeling the same about guns as you do?
I'm willing to bet not. There having a gun would be as vital as it was in this country.
So IMO the question should not be one of country, but of population density.
If its less than 5 people per square mile it should be unregulated. With tighter restrictions going up as the population gets shoved closer together.
Last but not least, a gun never killed anyone. People kill people, if they don't have guns they'll use cars, knives, shovels or whatever else is handy.