Author Topic: RICO Act filed against Bush  (Read 6436 times)

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2004, 09:25:26 AM »
Geez Kappa...have a bad prostate exam where the Doc kept both hands on your shoulders?  :p   Lighten up!

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2004, 09:27:55 AM »
Lighten up? Light up!?!?

There is work to be done!  Kappa must be crowned Super Chempokomon Master and destroy the evil power!

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2004, 09:29:52 AM »
but ...what happened to Jimmy Hoffa?

Offline Stringer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1610
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2004, 09:31:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
but ...what happened to Jimmy Hoffa?


For the last time....THE SICILIANS!!!

All that concrete poured at the WTC site....come on, it was to cover up Hoffa!!

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18203
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2004, 09:35:34 AM »
kappa

you are not serious

very scary to think you just might be ....
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline SLO

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2548
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2004, 09:36:38 AM »
funny...

no one has come up with some answers....

except Sirloin....

the magic bullet believers are predominant on these boards....

goes to show Kappa...a brain is very dangerous:rofl

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #21 on: February 11, 2004, 09:38:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by LePaul
Geez Kappa...have a bad prostate exam where the Doc kept both hands on your shoulders?  :p   Lighten up!


LMAO. never heard that one before! :rofl

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2004, 09:42:20 AM »
FOOOOOOOOOOLs!

Naw, Kappa didn't try to lead us to a conspiracy conclusion in the last thread. Naw. He's just curious.

Lawsuit is dead in the water, Kappa. 17 minutes before, 17 minutes after, her husband was still dead. Wouldn't have mattered in the least.

Offline texace

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1031
      • http://www.usmc.mil
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2004, 10:43:25 AM »
Ah ignorance. Just the thing I need to lighten up my day. Bad psych class.

Thanks, kappa. Your ignorant and blatent grasp at straws that don't exsist made this college student feel much better. When I graduate and recieve my dimploma, I'll look back on this day and smile.

I may even send you a cut of my paycheck. That is...unless Bush decides to bomb my university or something because it's on prime oil land and the Dean could be hiding WMD in his office...

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2004, 11:06:52 AM »
a brain is very dangerous
====
So true.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12768
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #25 on: February 11, 2004, 11:27:02 AM »
Kappa, we're not laughing at ya, oh wait, yes we are. :D
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline RedDg

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 998
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #26 on: February 11, 2004, 11:40:32 AM »

Offline Red Tail 444

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2497
      • http://www.redtail.org
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #27 on: February 11, 2004, 11:52:42 AM »
----------I won't begin to get into Haliburton------- we'll stay with the JV team for now...

We don't see Bob Eueker or some other .200 lifetime batter owning a baseball team, so why did the Supreme Court appoint a failed businessman to run the largest business on the planet? Go figure ...:rolleyes:

During the buildup to war, President Bush said the United States "must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.... We have every reason to assume the worst, and we have an urgent duty to prevent the worst from occurring." 1

On the eve of sending troops into battle, Bush asserted that "intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised." 2

Now David Kay, the CIA's chief weapons inspector, has testified before Congress that these weapons do not exist.

In an attempt to evade responsibility for the misleading statements that pushed the nation into war, Bush has announced plans to form an independent inquiry to look into what went wrong. An inquiry would serve the Bush administration well: it would envelop the issue in a fog of uncertainty, deflect blame onto the intelligence services, and delay any political damage until 2005, after the upcoming election. 3

But the facts need no clarification. Despite repeated warnings from the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency, President Bush and his administration hyped and distorted the threat that Iraq posed. 4 And now that reality is setting in, the President wants to pin the blame on someone else. We can't let him.

Congress has the power to censure the President -- to formally reprimand him for betraying the nation's trust. If ever there was a time for this, it's now. Join our call on Congress to censure President Bush at:

http://www.moveon.org/censure/

It's clear that we've been misled:

 

a.. David Kay said last week, "I'm personally convinced that there were not large stockpiles of newly produced weapons of mass destruction," and "We don't find the people, the documents or the physical plants that you would expect to find if the production was going on." 5 Kay said these things shortly after resigning from his post as Bush's chief weapons inspector in Iraq.

b.. Bush, in his 2003 State of the Union address, said, "the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." 6 Yet Ambassador Joe Wilson, who was sent to Niger in February 2002 to determine whether Iraq was trying to purchase uranium materials there, concluded that "intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat." 7

c.. A CIA report in February 2003 said: "We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since [1998] to reconstitute its Weapons of Mass Destruction programs." 8

It's also clear that the misleading was deliberate:

 

a.. The respected Carnegie Endowment for International Peace recently found that the administration "systematically misrepresented the threat" from Iraq. 9

b.. The basis for President Bush's African uranium claim was known at the time to be forged and not credible.10 "Top White House officials knew that the CIA seriously disputed the claim that Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium in Africa long before the claim was included in Bush's January address to the nation," according to the Washington Post.11

c.. Secretary of State Colin Powell became alarmed at the level of intelligence distortion. When he read the first draft of his speech to the UN -- prepared for Powell by Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff -- he was so upset that he lost his temper, throwing several pages in the air and declaring, "I'm not reading this. This is bullsh--."12

Our democracy only works when we know the truth. We now know President Bush and his administration deliberately misled Congress and the American people. Censure is the least we should expect in response.

Footnotes:

1. Washington Post, January 28, 2004

2. Official White House transcript, March 17, 2003

3. Washington Post, February 2, 2004

4. An excellent, comprehensive rundown on the Bush administration's deliberate distortion of intelligence is available from the Center for American Progress

 

5. New York Times, January 26, 2004

6. Official White House transcript, January 28, 2003

7. Joseph Wilson Op-Ed, New York Times, July 6, 2003

Note: Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, had her CIA cover blown, possibly by the White House, in apparent retaliation for Wilson's contradicting the White House's line on WMDs.

8. MSNBC News, Oct. 24, 2003

9. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace report, "WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications", January, 2004

10. New York Times, July 8, 2003

11. Washington Post News Service, July 23, 2003

12. US News & World Report, June 9, 2003

Note: This article with the Powell quote is available for purchase from the US News & World Report archives for $2.95

Offline texace

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1031
      • http://www.usmc.mil
RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #28 on: February 11, 2004, 12:49:09 PM »
Yet no one goes to Syria to look, or starts shipping shovels.

Deliberately misled Congress? Will we ever know? Most likely not. All I've seen so far about all this is the Dems and Bush haters digging and digging and occasionally finding a nugget. Now the question is will they aquire enough nuggets to build a house?

We'll know come Nov. I predict a Bush victory...but that's just me...

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Re: RICO Act filed against Bush
« Reply #29 on: February 11, 2004, 12:56:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kappa

1. Why were 29 pages of the 9/11committee report personally censored at your request?

2. Where are the "black boxes" from Flight 11 and Flight 175?

3. Where are the "voice recorders" from Flight 11 and Flight 175?

4. Why can't we gain access to the complete air traffic control records for Flight 11 and Flight 175?

5. Where are the airport surveillance tapes that show the passengers boarding the doomed flights?

6. When will complete passenger lists for all of the flights be released?

7. Why did your brother Jeb (the Governor of Florida) go to the offices of the Hoffman Aviation School and order that flight records and files be removed? These files were then put on a C130 government cargo plane and flown out of the country. Where were they taken and who ordered it done?



Here let me take a stab at it:

1) Classified due to national security concerns.
2) Destroyed in the collision with WTC 1 & 2.
3) Destroyed in the collision with WTC 1 & 2.
4) Classified due to national security concerns.
5) Classified due to national security concerns.
6) When the CIA/FBI decide that they can be released.
7) Removed due to national security concerns. Files removed from flight school and taken to undisclosed location at request of CIA/FBI. The exact location is classified and on a need-to-know basis. And my brother Jeb ordered it just like you said at the beginning of the question smartass.

Quote

While America was under attack, for approximately the next seven (7) to eighteen (18) minutes Defendant GWB continues to listen to the goat story while Plaintiff's husband was just murdered and does not immediately assume his duties as Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces
[/b]

Pick one:
Forgot superman costume at home.
Did not find suitable phone-booth to change into costume.
Kids with cryptonite.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2004, 01:00:51 PM by Hortlund »