Gay Parenting

[hawker238]

I didn't want to put this in the other thread because it was already full of arguments and debates, so its going here.

Do you think that a child age 10-18 going through middle and high school with two dads will turn out ok?  I have no problem with gay marriage and such, but I feel that an adolescent's life is tough enough as it is.  If I had homosexual parents, high school would turn into a daily hell.  Gay parents can love, nuture, and raise a child well, but can that kid survive society in his adolescense?

[midnight Target]

People used to make the exact same argument against mixed race marriages.

[Frogm4n]

when half the kids in high school are metrosexuals already i dont think it will matter. He will actually have the live journel with the most hits. Girls will flock to his emotional emo poetry crap, and will get laid all the time.

[bpti]

, there's a chnace that he might turn out gay:lol

[hawker238]

Originally posted by Frogm4n
when half the kids in high school are metrosexuals already i dont think it will matter. He will actually have the live journel with the most hits. Girls will flock to his emotional emo poetry crap, and will get laid all the time.

Haha, that's more true than anyone can possibly imagine.  However, middle school could still be torture.

MT: I have absolutely no problem with people being gay and being parents, and I'm not making an argument here.  All I'm wondering is if you guys think you could have survived high school with two dads.

[Capt. Pork]

Originally posted by Frogm4n
when half the kids in high school are metrosexuals  

I've heard this trem a bunch but still don't quite get it. What, exactly, is a metrosexual?

[hawker238]

Someone who dresses like a gay guy and is sensitive like a gay guy, but is straight.  You'd have to be in high school to see.  I see boys walking around wearing skin tight pants and tacky business suits every damn day....


I know I used gay as a very simplistic generalization, but get over it.

[JB73]

**** i cant even begin to dicuss this topic.

*** marrige is biblically wrong.

biblically marrige is a union between a man and a woman.





for you aitheists . it;s NOT a "marrige"

if you want it to be accepted by the government then it's a "gonvernment ordained union" or some ****.

either way it is NOT ****ing recognized by the church or God. END of dicussion. there is NO possible religous debate over the subject. God does NOT endorse ****** unions. never has never will.

if the govenrment wants to give benefits to **** then guess what... we elected them.

God says obey the leaders he has put above us...


well i will i guess. i have no choise but to vote otherwise.


took out deroggatory slang towards homosexuals to not offend others

sry skuzzy.

[hawker238]

Originally posted by JB73

God does NOT endorse studmuffingot unions. never has never will.

How do you know?

Maybe some of the bible doesn't reflect God's will?  Maybe it was written by ultra-orthodox patriarchs?

I'm an athiest by the way.  Don't bother arguing about god with me, I can't really discuss it without voiding the argument.




Regardless, this thread is going off topic....

[Holden McGroin]

Originally posted by JB73
God does NOT endorse studmuffingot unions. never has never will.

Direct quote from Psalms 1:23.... (joke, don't look it up....)

[JB73]

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Direct quote from Psalms 1:23.... (joke, don't look it up....)

Leviticus
[22] Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
[23] Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.
[24] Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you

[JB73]

you know what ,,, i broke my own rule.

pissed off and drunk i broke my own rule.

nevar enter a political/religous debate on a bulletin board. the opposition will only overwhelm you with assinine statements from oscure locals, or irrational thinking.

sorry for straying from my stance.

thread ignored

but i stand by my comments let it be known even if i dont respond in the topic any more

[thrila]

Irrational thinking?

Believing in something written by man proclaiming it to be the word of God sounds irrational to me.

[stiehl]

Originally posted by JB73
**** i cant even begin to dicuss this topic.

*** marrige is biblically wrong.

biblically marrige is a union between a man and a woman.





for you aitheists . it;s NOT a "marrige"

if you want it to be accepted by the government then it's a "gonvernment ordained union" or some ****.

either way it is NOT ****ing recognized by the church or God. END of dicussion. there is NO possible religous debate over the subject. God does NOT endorse ****** unions. never has never will.


.

I guess it's a good thing that this is America and not some kind of christian taliban-run theocracy

[Holden McGroin]

Originally posted by thrila
Irrational thinking?

Believing in something written by man proclaiming it to be the word of God sounds irrational to me.

Of course:

Ra·tion·al    
adj.
Having or exercising the ability to reason.
Of sound mind; sane.
Consistent with or based on reason; logical: rational behavior. See Synonyms at logical.

Faith    ( P )  
n.
Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust.

Faith and logic are mutually exclusive.