Author Topic: WARNING! Volatile subject within. Enter at your own risk! You've been warned!  (Read 4382 times)

funked

  • Guest
Mino I love you man but that is a bunch of baloney.  

Offline Andy Bush

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 153
      • http://www.simhq.com  (Contributing Editor - Air Combat Corner)
Let's put the politics aside for a moment and consider this from one of the posters:

>>That said, many people would argue that pound for pound, there has never been a collection of aircraft fighter pilots like the German LW. The highest kill records in the history of aviation belong to LW pilots. There are many reasons why, but the bottom line is that they were probably the best.<<

This argument leads nowhere. Does the poster mean that the LW pilots were somehow genetically superior to anyone else? Or does he only mean better trained? Or more experienced? Or, perhaps, more fanatical? Or, all of the above.

It might be possible to show that the LW recruiting standards in the 1933-39 period were more stringent than in most countries. It is a fact that the experience that the LW got in the Spanish Civil War was a significant factor in their success early in the war. (For those not up on the Spanish Civil War...this conflict was a watershed moment for air combat. The introduction of the Me-109 spelled the end to the WW1 concept of individual 'turn and burn' dogfights between small, lightly armed, highly maneuverable fighters. The LW Me-109 operations proved the ascendancy of the high speed, heavily armed, radio-equipped fighter force that operated in tactical formations.)

When WW2 began, the British and French air forces had none of the experience that the LW had. While their aircraft may have been relatively equal to the LW fighters, their pilot experience levels were not. Throughout 1939 and 1940, the learning curve was steep and costly...but it was learned.

As a matter of debate, if I had to rate an air force strictly on dogfighting skills at the beginning of WW2, I'd give the nod to the Japanese...for all of the reasons given above. Better selection process, better training, plenty of experience in China and Manchuria, and good equipment. A face off between the 1940 LW and the Japanese Army and Navy pilots would be an interesting situation. I would not want to predict which would come out on top.

On a final note...I taught LW pilots in the F-104 during the 70s...both new pilots right out of pilot training...and experienced pilots in the F-104 Fighter Weapons School. I'm here to tell you that Germans are no better or worse than anyone else....some good, some bad...most in the middle.

The answer is not in some racial superiority ballyhoo...it is instead in experience levels, numerical superiority, and better tactical doctrine.

Andy

[This message has been edited by Andy Bush (edited 08-28-2000).]

dbcooper

  • Guest
 Karnak you might want to check out the BF109G2.

Offline Downtown

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
      • http://www.tir.com/~lkbrown1
There is more also.

There were Russians who fought for Germany, not because they were Anti-Russia, Pro-Germany, or Pro-Hitler, or NAZI's or Aryans.  They were Anti-Communist.  Many of the French Pilots in the Normandie Niemen flew with the Russians because they were Socialist or Communists, and Anti-Fascists, and didn't have Democratic or Monarchiacal leanings.  THere were Russians captured at Ohmaha beach on D-Day.  The French fought against the Americans and English, as well as along side them.

And what is not mentioned is that the German people were either brainwashed or intimidated into the whole NAZI/Aryan thing.  There were many Anti-Facists in Germany before and during WWII and a lot of them got Burned up in the Ovens along side the Hebrews and the Homosexuals.

A lot of the professional officers in the German Military were following the orders of their political leaders.  Toward the end of the war, they were attempting to get the Americans and British to help them fight against the Russians.

In China the Communists made up the larger part of the trained and organized forces that actually resisted the Japanese where the Warlords and the (I hesitate to say) Democratic people fought, argued, or abscended.

If were as simple as Black and White, good versus evil, Axis and Allies there would be no discussion, but it wasn't that simple.  There were 1st and 2nd Generation Americans who had emigrated from Germany in the U.S. Army fighting against the Germans.  Germany had nearly as large a population of Resistance fighters as France.  There is quite a bit of evidence that a very organized group of German Industrialist and bankers organized via the Swiss the defeat of Germany(Hitler) and the Reconstruction of Germany (at least on the Allied Side.)  I have seen de-classified documents of this organization that were in Washington many months prior to D-Day.

Hartmann's Father told him that day that Germany declared war on the U.S. that the war was lost.

From reading his book I don't get the impression that Hartmann was much impressed with Hitler, of course that may have been editorialized for the "Cold War" media, but it seemed pretty sincere.

Yes there were Ranting Nazi Lunatics in the Cockpits of 109s, but there was also Soldiers defending their native soil, people who believed that they were doing something that would benifit their nation, and by extention their families.

When U.S. Forces went to Vietnam and Korea you know that a lot of men patted their sons on their shoulders and and said "Son, it's your turn to defend democracy and freedom."

Tell me why we fought Iraq for Kuwait?  Tell me that the U.S. is a just nation that does not wrong, and that our soldiers improve the situation and make the world a better place.

Look at Vietnam, still healing after nearly 30 years.  How are things in Somalia, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Korea?  Are they better today than they were before we went to war for/over them?

My own respect, and I am in no way a Luftwaffe Pilot Fanatic, is in the accomplishments of the men who day in and day out went up against over whelming odds, and survived and in some cases exceeded expectations.

And like Zigrat, I love planes, many of the WWII Era German aircraft have a mystique that is attractive.  They are not un-appealing aircraft to look at.  I find the P-40 the most attractive of all WWII Era Aircraft and you would be hard pressed to name one thing that is was the best at.

I would prefer to keep politics out of my "FLIGHT SIMS" but they occasionally rear their ugly heads, when that happens the best I can hope for is a reasoned discussion, or an entertaing flame war.

------------------

"Downtown" Lincoln Brown.
    lkbrown1@tir.com    
 http://www.tir.com/~lkbrown1
Wrecking Crews "Drag and Die Guy"
Hals und beinbruch!

YankeeStation

  • Guest
The initial point made up here has been worrying more people, I've 'heard' quite some comments on it on the bb.

I personally think that it's very dangerous and sad if the LW pilots of WWII are considered great brave knights who faced overwhelming odds etc.. If someone thinks this of WWI pilots I tend to agree a bit more but in WWII they defended and were a vital and willing part in the Nazi war machinery.

I personally like to fly LW planes as well but anyone who identifies himself with and sympathizes with the LW pilots has no historical conscience and is morally sick (or has extremely pathetic political sympathies).

So let's all enjoy AH and show some decency in your statements on the bb and in the air


Bies


Offline BotaBing

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 138
Well, I think its pretty clear that German pilots were better than anyone they were up against.

Unfortunately, Germany isnt anywhere near the Pacific. So comparing Germans to Japanese is pretty unimportant.

The German LW pilots of the 1970 are also pretty unimportant as it relates to the point of my post. I was generally talking about German LW pilots from WWII, since that is the game we all play, and the point of this message board.

So...applying some logic and context, what my post says is that in the European theatre, the Germans had the best pilots.

Everyone gets a big woody when they hear about some American or Brit pilot with 15 or 20 kills. 15 or 20 kills is nothing compared to 200-300+ kills that some of the LW pilots had racked up.

I don't know what hat you pulled a genetic superiority overtone from...it sure wasn't from my post. I suggest you go troll somewhere else. This is a post about trying to understand why some people seemingly worship the LW pilots. My point was simple - because some people think they were the best. In fact, for their time and location, I think they were the best. They had a hell of a lot more experience than did their British, French, American, Polishand other adversaries.

The LW pilots of WWII fought for years, almost never retiring, and on many fronts. New Pilots was a luxury that Germany lost as time went on. In those many years, having the opportunity to fight close to home, on many fronts, against many different types of pilots and aircraft, i think its only logical that after all that, they would be the best pilots walking around in that neck of the woods.

So, coming back to the post that my post was in response to, I think that some people worship the WWII LW pilots because of their flying skill and experience, pure and simple. I seriously doubt that many of the people who have their clans named after LW flight groups, or people who build German aircraft models, or people who have Nazi items as collectibles agree with the Nazi philosophy and mantra.

As much as there were German pilots who showed respect for a skilled foe by not shooting down his chute, by allowing him to ditch in the water, etc, it should also be ok for non-German pilots to show some respect for the flying skills of their German adversaries.

[This message has been edited by BotaBing (edited 08-28-2000).]

[This message has been edited by BotaBing (edited 08-28-2000).]

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
dbcooper,
You might want to read up on your Finnish history.

That is not a swastika.  It is an old Finnish symbol that was in use for many years before Nazi Germany existed.  It has nothing to do with Nazi Germany or Nazi beliefs.

Sisu
-Karnak
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Botabing,
Johnnie Johnson had a good retort to your suggestion.

When asked why he only got 38 kills when the German pilots racked up hundreds he replied "Because I didn't see that many enemy aircraft through the whole war".

If the Allies had been in the same "Target-Rich-Environment", e.g. losing, as the Germans were, there would certainly have been British, Russian, Commonwealth or American pilots with hundreds of kills.

Before you can score like a German, Japanese or Finnish pilot you have to have enough targets with which to score.

Personally I think that there would be little to chose between J.E. Johnson, H. Nishizawa, F. Gabreski, Hartman, A. Galland, A. Mallan, Boyinton, S. Sakai,and R.R.S. Tuck.

Sisu
-Karnak
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline BotaBing

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 138
Karnak

Totally agree. Germans were the most accomplished because of opportunity, in my opinion. I don't claim to be a historian, but I know enough about numbers to say this much.

All things being equal, the German pilots with 200-300 kills were no better skilled than the American and British pilots with 25-40 kills, etc.

But, I think that just adds to the fire of the original post. Like it or not, 300+ kills is infinitely more impressive than anything pumped out by an allied pilot.

Any pilot who has been alive and flying long enough to get 300+ kills would be feared. There's not enough room on the plane for all the kill stickers.

So, for those people who are fascinated by the 300+ kill LW pilot, they apparently are able to divorce themselves from the fact that it was 300+ kills advancing the Nazi cause. Just like someone who goes and gets a signature from OJ Simpson, an American athlete who murdered his ex-wife and her boyfriend, etc.

[This message has been edited by BotaBing (edited 08-28-2000).]

vadr

  • Guest
Jesus I hate even stepping into this thread, but since Andy posted, I'll jump in too. For the record: I'm with Grinbird, this is a subject that can be debated intelligently, but only by the coolest of heads in the most mutually respectful atmosphere. This BBS (any BBS), contains neither.

To understand the motivations of the German people, and the environment that created and fostered Adolph Hitler and the murderous gangsters who were the Nazi Party, you must take into account WWI, the Treaty of Versailles, and the conditions which existed in Germany in the late 1920's. If you kick a man (or a nation) while he's down, when he gets back up, he's going to really want to kick your prettythang. A simple analogy I grant you, but accurate, I think. The Marshall Plan and the United Nations were both created specifically to ensure that the mistakes of Versailles were not duplicated.

As to the quality of the German Luftwaffe and it's pilots, I think one needs to understand that 1930's Germany was a 'Nation of Flyers' unlike any other. State sponsored gliding schools were everywhere, youth was encouraged to participate at little or no cost in flying and gliding programs of all types. Please don't take my word for it, or even the German's word for it, read the writings of Eric Brown (a German-speaking British test pilot). This ensured that the Luftwaffe would have a large of pool of aviation-minded recruits.

Andy is correct in pointing out the influence of the Spanish Civil War. While the Russians also participated in this conflict in similar numbers, it was the Germans (notably Werner Molders and Gunther Lutzow) who learned the most from it. I think the number of German pilots who actually participated in the War was something on the order of 200, but their experience was invaluable, and widely disseminated among the Luftwaffe.

So, when WWII began, the Luftwaffe (like the Wehrmacht) had good equipment and a superior tactical system, which went far to offset the fact that they were outnumbered in every conflict after Poland. This accounts for their success, and nothing else does. As the War progressed, other nations adopted the same tactical system, with better equipment, pilots, and vastly superior numbers. To quote Napoleon: "God fights on the side of the big battalions".

I had the chance to work with some West German armored units back in the late 1980's when there were still 2 Germanies. Like Andy, I found them to be good soldiers: some brilliant, some dullards most in-between. Pretty much like every other group of Soldiers I've ever met.

I feel that I have to mention that among all the many other plots to overthrow and/or assasinate Hitler before the War, there was a near mutiny among the German General Staff when they were required to swear an oath of allegiance to Adolph Hitler personally in addition to their oath to the German State. In the end, they decided to follow their orders and serve their country. They were wrong to do so, but that is an easy thing to say in the year 2000, and a difficult choice for any honorable soldier to face.

It is extremely easy to demonize the Luftwaffe and indeed the German people for WWII. It is, for many, just as easy to lionize them. Both stances are wrong. One must be able to put oneself in the shoes of the average German in that time to understand the reasons why, and the lesson to be taken is that such conditions, and such resulting madness, must never be allowed to happen again.

No one hates War as much as a Soldier, because only a Soldier truly understands what War is.



------------------
Vadr
Kommandeur, III/JG 2 'Richthofen'
CM, S3 Team/Parser
    vadr@jg2.org    
Combat Flightsim Business Forum      

Offline Ozark

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1176
Guess I'm missing something.

When I click to the P-38, Spit, 109 or Zeke...All I'm looking for is that my induced electrons over power their induced electrons.


AKSeaWulfe

  • Guest
and this is why I idolize the 332nd Fighter Group of the 15th Air Force. They fought two wars, one against nazi germany and one against racial segregation. They didn't lose a single bomber they escorted to enemy fighters either. I don't care about kill records(anyone cared to look up how many times some of the LW guys with high scores got shot down?), they did their job and they did it well. Those are some true american heros.
(tries his best to hijack thread) :-)
EDIT: I flew in the WarBirds recreation of a tuskegee airmen escort mission. That was a freaking blast. I think there were even some of the original pilots flying from a place in Seattle, Washington called "The Other Side".. that was a blast! :-)

-SW

[This message has been edited by AKSeaWulfe (edited 08-28-2000).]

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Points.
I think that the rabid luft wabble is a very rare thing in Aces High.

Giving the benifit of the moral doubt to the individual LW flyers is one thing. Giving it collectivly to the General staff is another. The General staff knew exactly who they were getting in bed with in the mid 30s. They just assumed they could control Hitler. Much as Neville Chamberlain did.

Implying that the Germans were just confused about their viewpoint is kinda offensive to me. Please read "Hitlers willing executioners"

While I would say that the top allied aces were the equal of any pilots in the war, I believe that it is a mistake to assume that they would have racked up hundereds of kills if the situation was reversed. The skills that make you successfull over hundereds of air battles are not neccesarily the ones that make you successful for dozens. I present macdonald as an example. Not that some allied pilots would not have been as successfull. But I believe it is mistaken to name names. Giving some  25 kill ace credit for 250 kills is dishonest. That canot be taken away from the german pilots. They really did it. No guessing required.

While bashing people that fly german Iron in AH is narrow and silly to me. Blindly assuming that the german pilots that fought through the war had some moral fibre that none or few displayed is equaly silly. These men are accountable for what they did and did not do. They aided in starting and prolonging a horible, evil war declared by a mad man but persecuted by them. Acknowledge their tactical accomplishments and bravery, acknowledge their moral failure and cowardess.
Are their people of every race and creed that might behave the same? yes
I wish they could do better too.

Offline BBGunn

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Its probably best to give up nationalisms-I could play the game with a red or blue or green country just fine.  The differences in historical weaponry make the game more interesting and the flight simulation of the various AC is very enjoyable.  Some folks may react to the fact that the allies won, thinking the allies were guiltless denfenders of whatever-and therefore Hitlers group were devils etc. If you take the time to dig into the facts (some well hidden) you may find that the allies were not blameless or spotless in their motivations.  A thorough study of the history of the Pearl Harbor attack (written by a decorated naval officer) about made me throw up.  So its probably easier on the psychi to think of the cyber countries as Pizzaria or Beerica and play the game for fun. I have no interest in flaming Germans or Japanese or anybody--well, maybe a congressman from time to time.  Anger well directed-HEHE.

vadr

  • Guest
Sorry if I my comments on the General Staff came across that way. I was relating a factual episode, it was not my intention to paint the entire group of people with a lily-white brush.

As far as numbers of kills, I'm constantly amazed that this is ever held in contention. The Jagdflieger scored a lot more kills than anyone else because they were in combat longer, and they operated almost constantly in a target-rich environment. They didn't score more kills because they were better pilots or had better aircraft; they scored more kills because they had more targets and more time.

I think that a very good way to judge the skill of a combat pilot is to look at his/her 'Strike Rate' (kills/sortie). By this measurement, many Allied pilots (notably Robert Johnson) compare very favorably with the Luftwaffe of the period.



------------------
Vadr
Kommandeur, III/JG 2 'Richthofen'
CM, S3 Team/Parser
    vadr@jg2.org    
Combat Flightsim Business Forum