Author Topic: WARNING! Volatile subject within. Enter at your own risk! You've been warned!  (Read 4273 times)

Offline wells

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 166
 
Quote
Unless they were complete nit wits, each man, in his turn, must
                    have chosen to help hitler.

...or choose death.  which is it gonna be?  If it were me, I'd probably choose to fly a cool plane like a Fw-190 before I died.

Offline Andy Bush

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 153
      • http://www.simhq.com  (Contributing Editor - Air Combat Corner)
Botabing

My first post was meant to address what I see as popular perceptions regarding the LW experience in the early days of WW2. I excerpted part of your post (without referencing you personally) as an example of this line of thought. Had I had a bone to pick with you, I would have began my post as I am doing now.

>>The highest kill records in the history of aviation belong to LW pilots.<<

Depending on how 'kill record' is defined, this can be shown to be false. In terms of kills to losses, the best record in WW2 probably belongs to the AVG in China from December 1941 to the summer of 1942. There are parallels that can be drawn to the BOB time frame...better equipment, better training, better tactics.

>>Well, I think its pretty clear that German pilots were better than anyone they were up against.<<

I don't think this is clear at all. In all the post-action deliberations that took place after the Battle of Britain, no one has ever advanced the idea that the LW pilots were 'better' than their RAF counterparts. Better aircraft...in some cases. More of them...definitely. Better tactics...again, in some cases. Better trained...maybe, maybe not...training is only half the picture...the other half is experience...and here the LW gets the initial advantage.

Finally...what's your time frame? 1940? The entire war? If it's the latter, have you forgotten which side ultimately won air superiority over Germany?

I suggest you find yourself a book on LW WW2 pilots. Forget about the ones with 300 kills that survived the war. Instead, concentrate on the ones with 100-200 kills that didn't. In nearly every case, you will find that they got blown away by some nameless Allied pilot who got into their six undetected. For these pilots, how much good did their 'better' skills do them?

I did not mean to imply that you had inferred a racial superiority tone to your argument. But, this has often been the case in commentary on this subject...and that is why I mentioned it. Some people just like to think that the image of the blue-eyed, blond-haired German superhuman is typical of the WW2 German pilot. As I'm sure you would agree, this is a bunch of baloney.

Initially better trained and more experienced. Other than that, no difference.

Andy

Offline Wanker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
<S> Gentlemen, there have been some brutally frank opinions given here, and nobody has popped a gasket(yet).

I know this is an extremely sensitive topic, but one I've always found fascinating. I've read a lot of military history on WWI and WWII, and what I've found most tragic(yet interesting) is what led to the wars in the first place.

The reason WW2 has not disappeared into the historical neverworld yet, is because the people affected by it are still alive.

Watching my 54 year old mother as she stares at a picture of her then 24 year old father(he died two months after the picture was taken), as she describes what it was like to grow up never knowing the man who created her, is painful. And when I read the letter from my grandma to him, describing his new daughter--the letter has "Deceased, return to sender" stamped on the front...I really started to understand the horror that people went through during the war, and after.

Anyway, thanks for taking the time to respond, and for doing so in a mature manner. This is probably the most meaningful thread I've ever been a party to.

P.S Yeager, I'll have to call him up and get a clarification from him. He's 82 years old, but I know he was a sergeant of some flavor. He was the Armorer for his plane, the guy responsible for the operation of all the guns on his fort. 385th Bomb Group, 549th Bomb Squadron. Red Checkerboard tail. B-17G, "Ruby's Raiders".

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Sorry,but about fighter skills...

nothing will change my firm belief that Adolf Galland and Werner Molders were the best fighter pilots of all time. I can't decide between them, they both were simply awesome...

And wasnt only a matter of training and experience. Galland returned to air combat in 1945 after 3 1/2 years of forced "leave" and he did awesome sorties with Me262, a plane light years away of his last ride, a Me109F...and against experienced enemies all around his squadron.

vadr

  • Guest
Actually, my vote goes to Heinz 'Pritzl' Baer. Beginning as an Unteroffizer, he scored his first victory on Sept. 25th, 1939. He flew on all fronts, doing well on each: 96 vs the Russians, 124 (second only to Marseille) against the West. 8th all time, if memory serves, very high among the Bomber experten (21), and leading Jet Ace (16) among all nations until 1973.

Killed in a light aircraft accident, postwar.

------------------
Vadr
Kommandeur, III/JG 2 'Richthofen'
CM, S3 Team/Parser
    vadr@jg2.org    
Combat Flightsim Business Forum      

Offline Sundog

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1781
I salute all of you posting here. THIS is what a BB is really for. Reasonable discussion and debate. I have to say that I am very glad that The Allies won the War, and also very glad that I din't have to fight in it. The more I read on World War II, the battles, the politics, the world `economies' of the time, the more I learn there aren't any simple answers to the `why?' of it. Does it go back to the rise of the NAZI's in the late 1800's, the collapse of German might after World War I, and the rules imposed on them there after. Or the spread of Communism, Socialism, etc. It is probably all of those and quite a bit more we haven't even uncovered.

Having said that, I must say that I find a personal fascination with the German Aircraft of World War II because they had so many advanced features and designs. I have been an aviation nut my whole life and spent years in college learning to design them. As such, I have always considered the FW-190 to be an incredible aircraft design. However, I don't worship the German Fighter Pilots who fought for Hitler, but I do respect them regardless of their politics. They created most of the basic tactics we currently use (Finger four formation with loose pairing of wingman and leader, etc.) and fought many times (if they survived) outnumbered 10 or 20 to 1 from about '43 onwards. However, thankfully, the Allies prevailed.

Of course, as `evil' as we may consider some of these NAZI's (And I in no uncertain terms condone what they did or believed) it is painfully obvious the Allied Nations didn't care too much at the end of the War what anyone believed; witness how many NAZI's went to work for the US/USSR Aerospace Companies and organizations & also went to work for each countries `Spy' network.

The point of all this is only, really, to say I find it all `interesting' but in no way `simplistic'. Also, that I have a serious interest in German World War II aviation, but do not worship it. I say this, because sometimes I do speak in `glowing' terms for what the Germans (And Japanese)accomplished aeronautically. But never let it be considered as atonement for what the German and Japanese War Machine started.

It is also sad that Hitler trashed the Finnish symbol and appropriated it for his personal `mis-use'. Perhaps if the Neo-Nazis knew what that symbol really represented they would realize how oxymoronic they look, but then they wouldn't be who they are.

I, sincerely, thank everyone for keeping this discussion civil.

Well, time to go sign up for that new series of books on the Air War on the Eastern front. Hopefully they will have some more information in that series on the Russians use of the P-39 and P-63      Another aeronautical favorite!

Sundog
VMF-111 Devildogs


[This message has been edited by Sundog (edited 08-28-2000).]

Offline Jigster

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 107
      • http://www.33rd.org


It'll prolly get me whacked, but I honestly believe Charles "Chuck" Yeager is still the best pilot to ever take the helm of a fighter.

This the guy had the skill needed to fly every plane the US could get it hands on between the early forties to the late sixties is really impressive to me.

I will not argue that the Luftwaffe had the best pilots during WWII, but, I think there has never been a man with the dedication to simply flying then Yeager. I cannot imagine asking the supreme allied commander if I could stay and fight the Germans when I had the chance to go home, let alone start another tour afterwards. And then to actually have the chance to fly every axis and allied plane the US had in it's possesion as long as I wanted, and to become proficent enough to dive, loop, and stall anyone of them after complete flight testing. Not only that, but to be able to repair each plane by himself!

Perhaps if Yeager had not been testing planes from nearly 20 yeards before leading a squadron of F-86's in Germany, his record of being absolutely perfect in all manners would seem even more spectacular.

I believe that when Yeager was flight testing the MiG-15, some 7 or so years after his last combat mission, and whopped a current F-86 commander at will in BOTH the F-86 and then the MiG-15 says alot about a pilot.

Amazing guy. Private to General.

- Jig

Offline Rifle

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
I too have to salute you gentlemen for a level-headed debate. <S>

Q.Why were there so many LW pilots with 100+ kills ?
A. Because they did not have the option of NOT participating in the next TOD - no 25, 50 or however many missions and home. They either got maimed/killed in combat or killed the enemy a/c.
Note: Arguably, because of this 'fly till you die' existence, they had the upper hand  experience wise against most enemy pilots (1on1).

And yes, they had conscription in most if not all mainland European countries.

Now, my turn to ask the questions ...

Statement : The Geneva convention specifically prohibits the targeting of civilians with any weapons - even in 1940.

Q. AVM Harris was Chief of RAF Bomber Command and planner of "Operation Gommora" (the bombing of Hamburg) and General  Lemay - Chief of Pacific Bomber force and planner of the fire bombing of Tokyo, would this not make THEM war criminals ?

This is a rhetorical question as the winners are never brought to trial but I'm wandering far afield here to say that people do awful things that have to be taken in context with their situation. If a LW pilot refused to fly, there were 2 other choices , death or the Eastern Front as a foot soldier - wait that's one choice  

I respect the airmen who flew in WW2 be they LW or Allied ...

Cheers,
   (WB) Rifle S/L No.1 (Cdn)Squadron "Rams"

 

Offline BigJim

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
My only concern about threads like this is that they "seem" to be "agenda" born???  I worry when Nazism is compared to O J. Simpson (who for the record was found innocent in a court of "criminal" law).  We here in America are proud of being a nation of "laws" and living by them, but it seems in the last few years that the cry is that if the outcome is not what you like then disregard the law and keep beating the drum for your own version (sounds kinda like any other propaganda scheme) anyhow I for one donot take any polictical views when flying sims and think this topic might be better served elsewhere.  I love history but this is not the place for "Political Correctness" type posts no matter what you convictions are.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
We had an excellent discussion about the whys of LW hi scores. There are lots of reasons.

Why are people apologizing for their favorite pilots? Who could make a case for Chuck Yeager, Werner Molders, or Adolf Galland not being the best fighter pilot ever? The list is long. Because of who won we can honor them all without fear. But this thread is about seperating their air to air accomplishments from thier moral responsobility for the war.
I would feel much more comfortable honoring Chuck. (But I have read much more about the others..)
I am not saying the luftwaffe experten where war criminals. I am not saying that many pilots from other counties would not have looked the other way and fought the war as they did. I am saying that for the part they played, they are responsible. And the excellent sevice they gave Hitler is a signifigant factor in the length of the war.

When in battle you fight more for the guy beside you then the guy in the big house.
Ive been a soldier(never in war). I have sat over many beer and talked about decisions like that with lots of guys from many counties. It would be a hell of a thing. But part of it is you gotta live with and stand accountable for your decision.

There are opinions out there about the moral courage of some of these men that bear retelling.
"The success of the legendary Werner "Vati"("Daddy") Molders are too well known to be repeated here. Less known are the true circumstances during which he was killed. "Vati" Molders probably the greatest national hero of the Nazi propaganda by the time of his death, which was described as a flying accident, on November 22, 1941. However, in the German underground movment a witness account was circulated, which gave a different version: a body had been seen falling from the Heinkel in which Modlers travelled.
What is true, although it has escaped widespread publicity, is that molders had turned against the Nazi government shortly before his death. The violations against men and women of the church speaking up agianst the atrocoties in Germany had upset the catholic Werner Molders. After the arrest of the Bishop of Munster, who had reacted strongly against the Nazis, Molders wrapped up his decorations and his Nazi party membership card and sent it all to the party HQ along with his protest letter, where he explained that he henceforth refused "to wear the inignia of this type of system." A few weeks later the world was informed of the death of Germanys greatest fighter ace."

This is quoted entirly from
 Luftwaffe Fighter aces in Profile
By Clause Sundin and Christer Bergstrom.
I have no idea how much fact is there. Interesting that Molders was apperantly a card carrying Nazi though.
The authors make similar statments about Marseille.

Numbers of missions.
Werner Schroer flew 197 combat missions and destroyed 114 RAF and USAF aircraft.
Of course he is not even the least bit famous.

Gabraski flew 153 and scored 28.
It was the numbers of bad guys. Along with a plane and tactics to get the job done. But mostly numbers of bad guys.


I read a non credited account of Canadians fighting for the Germans on the eastern front and achieving over 100 kills...
Dont know what to make of that either. I can dig it up if anyone is interested.



[This message has been edited by Pongo (edited 08-29-2000).]

Offline Naso

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1535
      • http://www.4stormo.it
Very interesting thread.

Finally i see some cold headed discussion (with some exception  ).

It's difficult to analyze somethink so complex as the social contest of a nation 60 years ago, without a specific and professional knowledge.

But this is a good try.  

About the "NAZI, not NAZI" issue:

I can use as example Italy under fascist regime, from an outher perspective it's easy generalize and use the equation Italians=Fascists, but is too much semplicistic.

Now let's try to enter in the shoes of another person.

You are a normal guy living in your country, you believe in your fatherland, you Salute your flag, pay taxes, and serve (is still this way) your country in the costricted army period.

A new party raise in the government, they seem to work well, there is some wellfare, thinks are going better (the damage of Versaille seem receiding), the king believe in this no-hair funny man.

Well, they ask you to do the roman salute... who cares?

At this point you have 3 options, based on your personal and cultural attitude:

[list=1]
  • You are left minded, you dont like this government, and thinks are getting worse, they know it, they pursue you, make you lose the job, discriminate on you in every act of your social life, cut happens you misteriously disappear one night, and nobody will see you again, or you manage to escape in another country, maybe you succeded to hide your ideas and during the war you can start some kind of fight (they call you terrorist, but you know you're right)... and so on (probably i am in this category, or i hope so).
  • You agree with this nice and friendly mans, they think like you, you are pride of your nation, pissed off by the Versailles threaty, you know, Italians are the best, and they do the best, all the newspaper say you are right, you are an important part of society, pride of your black shirt (an ugly italian, indeed  ), we can call you a fanatic, and probably if the party says the jews are evil, you believe it, and hate them.
  • you are a simple, middle citizen, no big culture, normal work, sometimes read newspaper (lot of good think is doing this fascist party, uh?), you see being part of the party make think easier in normal life, so you decide to subscribe, finally they may be a little too rude guys, but the thinks are working better since they take the power, you understand, the actual situation cut be solved as they say, waging war, expanding your nation's influence in the world, you have to do your duty, you recieve the call as a soldier, and you go doing your duty for your nation, obeing orders.

At home the thinks are changing... getting strange... your neighborought (sp?) is a jew, a good guy, how can him be so evil as they say?.
One of your school friends was communist, and has been found dead in an alley (someone say was beated to death by fascists, can you believe it?).
Your army is not so strong as they said, you fight in a ridicule little tank versus the mighty matildas in the desert, but is your duty, so... you fly in your underpowered and peeshooter armed plane versus flying wonders like Spits and Tempests, but is your duty, so... you are marching in the cold snow at -30° with your paper boots (yes, paper!!), well, at least you can use pieces of the blanket around it to warm a little your feets, and this red ghosts hide and appear and fight like if in summer, but is your duty, so...
Suddenly you hear "we surrender", and your camarades become your enemies, they shoot your officers and capture the soldiers as "workers" for Germany, luckily you manage to escape back to your country, your town has been bombed by the allies, destruction is everywhere, probably you manage to hide until the end of war and the arrival of the allies, or you join with the fascist army to defend your loved countryland betrayed by the king, or you join with the partisans and fight fascists and nazis, or cross the lines and join the fight side by side with the allies.[/list=a]

Well, will be surprising, but the bigger part of the population will fit in the option #3, like most of us.

And dont foul yourself (like me in option 1  ).

The point?

Dont judge the story (big movements) like the mens (small actors), use different parameters, in story nobody is guilty (is just story), the mens are guilty, but usually few of them, not the entire population.

Judge people in different contests using the contest within THEY are, not using YOUR contest.

Just imagine to be there at the moment, with the knowledge of the period.

And ask yourself truly: "what i will do?".

Knowledge is freedom, every government know very well the best weapon to control people is information, so...

WATCH OUT !!!

YOU can become the NEW NAZI, without understand it.

Regarding the Svastika, is neither a finnish nor a German "copyright"  .

In fact is one of the older symbols of humankind, used since the prehistory by the early Homo Sapiens, is a variation of the spiral.

Long post, indeed.

Offline Andy Bush

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 153
      • http://www.simhq.com  (Contributing Editor - Air Combat Corner)
BigJim

>>...O J. Simpson (who for the record was found innocent in a court of "criminal" law)...<<

For the record, Simpson was not 'found innocent'. His judgement was 'not guilty' due to reasonable doubt. This is not an insignificant difference.

Otherwise, I agree with your position that this forum is for simmers, not evangelicals of any persuasion.

Andy

Offline Wingnut_0

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 183
      • http://www.Luftjagerkorps.com
 
Quote
Originally posted by banana:
But when I see some people who seem to "worship" the LW pilots of WW2, this gives me cause for pause.
 

It amazes me the amount of ppl that contiously bring stuff like this up as if it's some major issue.  

I started a squad over 2 years ago, P.T.R.  Pilots of the Third Reich.  I didn't want to use a historical name so I chose this one.  It reflects the LW pilots of that Time Period, not a political connection.

Now Karnack can attest that we've had this discussion before.  But I'll be nicer about it this time.  

War is war, period.  I've served and fought in the USAF, as well as my grandfather and 2 of his brothers.  1 in Pacific the other 2 in in Europe.

Soldiers are soldiers regardless of what they believed in or what some ppl think they believed in.  I view soldering as nothing more than a merc job.  Do it, and go home afterwards.  And that's how I view LW pilots.  Ppl just like others, who most of them fought for their country and not a  leader.

How did so man Russians fight for Stalin after seeing his bloody rampages?  How did american pilots and british alike drop bombs on civilian area's?  Simple.  It was their job.  During modern times, things like this can be seen as unlawful orders.  But during an all out world conflict your going to do what ur told instead of going to jail.  

Germany was a nation of aviation before, during and even after the war.  Only during the late, late stages of the war did the LW start using the Hitler Youth as pilots.  Which most LW pilots have and will say that it was very unwelcome.

As much as you don't like someone that likes German pilots and their history, I don't like someone that can't recognize a soldiers duties and see the history as just that.

Wingnut
P.T.R.


Offline -tronski-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2825
I've never really understood why people associate flying german a/c in a game means your secretly flying for the new fourth Reich, or your on some American History X trip...but however...

My grandfather was a lancaster tail gunner, and although he never really spoke about the war,..He did once tell me that the only thing he ever thought about, was that he missed  home but was proud to serve his country.and that he was glad he made it back every trip.
At his bowling club in New Zealand, there was a an Afrika Korps veteran who I met when I was on holiday with my grandparents and I remarked didn't Pop shoot at people like him, and he said that He was just like him..He loved his country, and and was glad he made it home.

Thats what I think about this debate. German soldiers are just like the present day military. You are there to do a job, and you do it the best you can. War is a dirty buisness, and you may not agree with who is running your country, but if it called on you for whatever reason you will do what your trained for.

LW pilots have my respect because they kept flying until the were killed or just couldn't fly no more. Whether it was invading Poland, and defending your home. Just like RAF, RNZAF, USAAF etc pilots have my respect...
History is written by the victors, and we all have very limited experience in such matters. What motivated Hitler has been widely discussed, but he is no more evil than Stalin, Mao and a host of others.

Its easy to be an arm chair general, and say what you may or may not do..but plenty of good people have done terrible things for many, many reasons. And you didn't have to wear SS runes to prove that.
Waffen SS units at the end of the war often surrendered to American formations believing they would be enlisted to fight "bolshevism", something that 1950's america came to know well. Plenty of allied countries had been kicking around minorities for countless decades before WW2, and continued to after.

Just be pleased that we played war games, and aren't called on to fight those wars...
God created Arrakis to train the faithful

Offline Wanker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
Pongo said:  
Quote
Werner Schroer flew 197 combat missions and destroyed 114 RAF and USAF aircraft. Of course he is not even the least bit famous.

Pongo, I don't know if you've ever seen this before, but back in the early 70's, the BBC produced a famous 26 part series on WWII called "A World at War". Part twelve is about the airwar over Germany in 43-45, and Werner Schroer is one of the lw pilots interviewed. He gives his account of what it was like attacking the American bombers, and how he taught his young pilots to "close their eyes" when the gunners opened up with thier .50's at 1000 yds. Very interesting stuff! I looked him up in a book, and discovered that he died in 1976, at a relatively young age.