I wondering which is considered the more capable machine. I know little about AFVs. They seem very similar.
Bradley:
Crew: 3 + 6
Armament: 1 x 25 mm cannon,
1 x 7.62 mm MG (coaxial),
2 x TOW ATGW launcher,
2 x 4 smoke grenade dischargers
Ammunition: 900 x 25 mm,
2,200 x 7.62 mm,
7 x TOW ATGW
Length: 6.55 m
Width: 3.61 m
Height (Turret Roof): 2.565 m
Height (Gunners Sight): 2.972 m
Power To Weight Ratio: 20.38 hp / tonne
Ground Clearance: 0.432 m
Weight (Combat): 22,940 kg
Weight (Empty): 19,005 kg
Engine: Cummins VTA-903T
turbocharged 8-cylinder diesel
developing 500 hp at 2,600 rpm
Maximum Road Speed: 66 km / hr
Maximum Water Speed: 7.2 km / hr
Maximum Range: 483 km
Fuel Capacity: 662 lit
Fording: Amphibious with preparation
Vertical Obstacle 0.914 m
Trench: 2.54 m
Gradient 60 %
Side Slope: 40 %
Armour: Classified
Armour Type: Aluminum / Laminate / Steel
NBC System: Yes
Night Vision: Yes (passive for commander, gunner & driver)
Warrior
Crew: 3 + 7
Armament: 1 x 30mm cannon,
1 x 7.62mm MG,
2 x 4 smoke grenade dischargers
Ammunition: 250 x 30 mm, 2,000 x 7.62 mm
Length: 6.34 m
Width: 3.034 m
Height (Turret Roof): 2.791 m
Height (Hull Roof): 1.93 m
Power To Weight Ratio: 21.4 bhp / tonne
Ground Clearance: 0.49 m
Weight (Combat): 25,700 kg
Engine: Perkins CV8 TCA V-8 diesel
developing 550 hp at 2,300 rpm
Maximum Road Speed: 75 km / hr
Maximum Road Range: 660 km
Fuel Capacity: 770 lit
Fording: 1.3 m
Vertical Obstacle 0.75 m
Trench: 2.5 m
Gradient 60 %
Side Slope: 40 %
Armour: Classified
Armour Type: Aluminium (hull), steel (turret)
NBC System: Yes
Night Vision: Yes (passive for commander, gunner & driver)
The warrior is faster, has a more powerful engine and has a longer range - it also possesses a larger calibre cannon and carries more troops. It doesn't have the TOW capability and I'm not sure on the type of ammo for the main weapon. The warrior always looks bigger to me on TV, but it is actually smaller than the Bradley.