I wondering which is considered the more capable machine. I know little about AFVs. They seem very similar.
Bradley:
Crew: 3 + 6 
Armament: 1 x 25 mm cannon, 
 1 x 7.62 mm MG (coaxial), 
 2 x TOW ATGW launcher, 
 2 x 4 smoke grenade dischargers 
Ammunition: 900 x 25 mm,  
 2,200 x 7.62 mm, 
 7 x TOW ATGW 
Length: 6.55 m 
Width: 3.61 m 
Height (Turret Roof): 2.565 m 
Height (Gunners Sight): 2.972 m 
Power To Weight Ratio: 20.38 hp / tonne 
Ground Clearance: 0.432 m 
Weight (Combat): 22,940 kg 
Weight (Empty): 19,005 kg 
Engine: Cummins VTA-903T 
 turbocharged 8-cylinder diesel 
 developing 500 hp at 2,600 rpm 
Maximum Road Speed: 66 km / hr 
Maximum Water Speed: 7.2 km / hr 
Maximum Range: 483 km 
Fuel Capacity: 662 lit 
Fording: Amphibious with preparation 
Vertical Obstacle 0.914 m 
Trench: 2.54 m 
Gradient 60 % 
Side Slope: 40 % 
Armour: Classified 
Armour Type: Aluminum / Laminate / Steel 
NBC System: Yes 
Night Vision: Yes (passive for commander, gunner & driver) 
Warrior
Crew: 3 + 7 
Armament: 1 x 30mm cannon, 
 1 x 7.62mm MG, 
 2 x 4 smoke grenade dischargers 
Ammunition: 250 x 30 mm, 2,000 x 7.62 mm 
Length: 6.34 m 
Width: 3.034 m 
Height (Turret Roof): 2.791 m 
Height (Hull Roof): 1.93 m 
Power To Weight Ratio: 21.4 bhp / tonne 
Ground Clearance: 0.49 m 
Weight (Combat): 25,700 kg 
Engine: Perkins CV8 TCA V-8 diesel 
 developing 550 hp at 2,300 rpm 
Maximum Road Speed: 75 km / hr 
Maximum Road Range: 660 km 
Fuel Capacity: 770 lit 
Fording: 1.3 m 
Vertical Obstacle 0.75 m 
Trench: 2.5 m 
Gradient 60 % 
Side Slope: 40 % 
Armour: Classified 
Armour Type: Aluminium (hull), steel (turret) 
NBC System: Yes 
Night Vision: Yes (passive for commander, gunner & driver) 
The warrior is faster, has a more powerful engine and has a longer range - it also possesses a larger calibre cannon and carries more troops. It doesn't have the TOW capability and I'm not sure on the type of ammo for the main weapon. The warrior always looks bigger to me on TV, but it is actually smaller than the Bradley.