Why are you guys opposed to another choice? Choice is good right? Hypothetically, if you could have an arena where every time you logged in you could engage in a constant dynamic furball would that be such a terrible thing. Ok so when you get bored you go to the MA or somewhere else.
What would be so bad if HTC created a Fighter Town? What is the worst that would happen? People would go there and fight?
If your so against it, then it's just a place you never go, if no one goes there then they can always remove it. All responses here are complete speculation. The only way to know what it would be is for HTC to actually do it.
Personally I think a Fighter Town is long over due. If it doesn't work it doesn't work but it should be tried. There is a missing element in this game. The land grabbers definately can and do affect the length, quality and duration of good fights in the MA. On some maps i.e. Pizza et-al good fights, furball type fights, are very hard to come by.
When people say "Ohh you can find any fight at any time on any map." I say BS. This clearly shows me you can't see the problem, you fly safe at alt getting into a fight here or a fight there or you are mostly ground pounding anyway.
Anyone who is looking for furball type AtoA has at some point found very little to do at some time on most of the maps in the MA. When this happens it would be nice to have a Fighter Town. I'm not saying a Fighter Town would gaurantee this, but it would be a step in the right direction.
The DA is not a fighter town and never will be.
You guys talk about choice, but we still have maps where most of the bases are a sector or more apart, clearly reducing the choices.
Fester has proven balanced maps where some bases are a sector or more apart and some that are not clearly creates more action. It forces the building battlers to work in a more coordinated way and gives fighter types many avenues to work from.
just my $.02.