Author Topic: Sherman Tank  (Read 3361 times)

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
Sherman Tank
« Reply #60 on: June 25, 2004, 12:52:11 AM »
nah he is just mad they put bomb after bomb in my tiger and still could kill me until the vh came up.  and i was DISABLED NO LESS!:D
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Sherman Tank
« Reply #61 on: November 07, 2007, 09:44:34 PM »
Nostalgia. :D

Offline SuBWaYCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1730
Sherman Tank
« Reply #62 on: November 07, 2007, 09:58:48 PM »
PUNT~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!!
Axis C.O. for Battle of the Dnieper, Winter '43

Air superiority is a condition for all operations, at sea, on land, and in the air. - Air Marshal Arthur Tedder

364th Chawks

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Sherman Tank
« Reply #63 on: November 08, 2007, 05:09:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
Nostalgia. :D


:D
See Rule #4

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Sherman Tank
« Reply #64 on: November 08, 2007, 11:42:37 PM »
Bring your issues with you wherever, Bronkie. ;) :aok

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Sherman Tank
« Reply #65 on: November 09, 2007, 04:50:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
Bring your issues with you wherever, Bronkie. ;) :aok

Arlo there are no "issues", like you, I'm just having a bit of fun. There was no antagonistic intent. I am sorry if it came off that way.Thought you'd have recognized that.  
Ahh well carry on.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2007, 04:55:00 AM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline Wes14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2996
Sherman Tank
« Reply #66 on: November 11, 2007, 02:08:42 PM »
Wow..
Warning! The above post may induce: nausea, confusion, headaches, explosive diarrhea, anger, vomiting, and whining. Also this post may not make any sense, or may lead to the hijack of the thread.

-Regards,
Wes14

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Sherman Tank
« Reply #67 on: November 11, 2007, 09:42:00 PM »
this will be closed now.   WTFG!
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Sherman Tank
« Reply #68 on: November 11, 2007, 09:45:17 PM »
Well, to serve purpose, we could talk about Shermie and T34 variants we still want modeled. Hint hint. ;)

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Sherman Tank
« Reply #69 on: November 11, 2007, 09:46:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
Well, to serve purpose, we could talk about Shermie and T34 variants we still want modeled. Hint hint. ;)
Nice deflection attempt.   You punted a 3 year old thread.    Yay you!
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Sherman Tank
« Reply #70 on: November 11, 2007, 10:27:04 PM »
Holy crap, Mashie. If I'd known all it took to knot your panties was to punt this old thread I'd done it long ago just for kicks.

What's with the negative vibes? Woof!

(shakes head)

Just glad to see the addition. I campaigned for it for a long time. Looking forward to giving it a try someday.

:D

*Lock it, baybee. No crisis. No hysterics.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2007, 10:42:25 PM by Arlo »

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
Sherman Tank
« Reply #71 on: November 11, 2007, 11:08:52 PM »
I was very happy to see that HVAP rounds were added to the T-34.  Barring the T-34-85, those were the best possible solution to the T-34 being useless.

I am puzzled at the choice of the Firefly instead of the 'vanilla' Sherman, unless they looked at what happened to the T-34 and decided it wouldn't see any use with the 75mm.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Sherman Tank
« Reply #72 on: November 11, 2007, 11:23:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Urchin
I was very happy to see that HVAP rounds were added to the T-34.  Barring the T-34-85, those were the best possible solution to the T-34 being useless.

I am puzzled at the choice of the Firefly instead of the 'vanilla' Sherman, unless they looked at what happened to the T-34 and decided it wouldn't see any use with the 75mm.


My thoughts, exactly. It's a balance issue. Create the variant with the closest equal bang to the Panzer. They still have room to whip out the vanilla variant if it's asked for by enough players (dunno if that'll ever happen).

What do you think of a "Battle of the Bulge" ground scenario featuring the Firefly variant? Think that'd float?

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Sherman Tank
« Reply #73 on: November 12, 2007, 04:48:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
Holy crap, Mashie. If I'd known all it took to knot your panties was to punt this old thread I'd done it long ago just for kicks.

What's with the negative vibes? Woof!

(shakes head)

Just glad to see the addition. I campaigned for it for a long time. Looking forward to giving it a try someday.

:D

*Lock it, baybee. No crisis. No hysterics.
Would you relax? :D
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
Sherman Tank
« Reply #74 on: November 12, 2007, 06:59:25 AM »
That would seem to make sense Arlo, but the Firefly appears to be closer to the Tiger than the Panzer in terms of performance.

I'd have to look up the 75mm guns specs, but I do think that nobody would have used it if it were modeled with the 75mm, simply because of the Tiger.  That is exactly what happened to the T-34 - it was almost literally impossible to kill a Tiger in a T-34 no matter what the circumstances were, so just the possibility of running into a Tiger kept the T-34 in the hangar.