Author Topic: 23yrd old Hottie Teacher Arrested for Porking 14yr old (Read 4341 times)

Sandman · « **Reply #75 on:** June 29, 2004, 03:04:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
sandie..sooo... the whole sex with minors deal is a "grey area" thing that we should take case by case? Is 12 too young if the person is "sexually active"?

How exactly would you word that law? I mean... you wouldn't want to confuse anyone right?

That's not the point.

Statutory rape laws are in place to protect all minors (regardless of sexual status) from adults. The fact that they all enjoy the same protection doesn't mean that they are all necessarily victims, IMHO. Certainly, as the age decreases, the potential for victimization increases.

hawker238 · « **Reply #76 on:** June 29, 2004, 03:27:36 PM »

Lazs, are you serious?

J_A_B · « **Reply #77 on:** June 29, 2004, 03:27:37 PM »

This thread is an example of what's wrong with America.

To answer an earlier question:

I would have said no when I was 14. I would say no right NOW even if I wasn't married. It's wrong to sleep with a married person regardless of your age.

That thing most people don't seem to have any more? You know, self-control? I still know what it is. I always have.

I don't drink, I never touched drugs, don't "party", don't smoke and won't sleep around. It's all pointless and catches up with you in the end.

One career de-railed, two families drug through the muck in this case. That's what you get when you have no self-control. The teacher should have known better. The kid also should have known better. They're both stupid.

If the kid "brags" about it and becomes a "hero" in his school, it is only because of people like those in this thread who encourage such behavior instead of comdemning it.

J_A_B

Curval · « **Reply #78 on:** June 29, 2004, 03:36:22 PM »

Jeeze...I want to party with JAB.

not.

Sandman · « **Reply #79 on:** June 29, 2004, 03:38:01 PM »

Self control in teenagers? I've yet to witness it.

rabbidrabbit · « **Reply #80 on:** June 29, 2004, 03:38:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mini D
To imply that a teacher having sex with a 14 year old is acceptable in any form is pretty odd. Statutory Rape is a crime for a very distinct reason, to prevent adults from taking advantage of the ignorance of youth. Consent and willingness have zero to do with it. It's simply a law to prevent those that should know better from taking advantage of those that don't.

I wonder how many would have "hit it" if they knew she'd be going to prison as a result of it. A 14 year old is not going to consider something like this.

MiniD

true, thats why it's there. In case of abuse but is this abuse?

but what will the consequences be for all involved? Just pondering while the lines are out..>

Mini D · « **Reply #81 on:** June 29, 2004, 04:53:49 PM »

It's not there in case of abuse. That's what normal rape charges are for. Statutory has nothing to do with someone saying "no".

MiniD

rabbidrabbit · « **Reply #82 on:** June 29, 2004, 05:05:06 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mini D
It's not there in case of abuse. That's what normal rape charges are for. Statutory has nothing to do with someone saying "no".

MiniD

30 years for consenting sex? It's not that she will get that much but should she get any if it's true?

it seems like a statute designed to make an "example" out of someone as opposed to fixing a problem.

midnight Target · « **Reply #83 on:** June 29, 2004, 05:11:02 PM »

No reason at all to treat her differently than you would a male teacher doing the same. What if the 14 yr old was gay? Still ok?

She deserves the worst they can give her. She has damaged at least 3 lives counting her own.

Seeker · « **Reply #84 on:** June 29, 2004, 05:13:48 PM »

So you're all for pædophilia if it comes from a position of authority?

You all catholics or something?

Sandman · « **Reply #85 on:** June 29, 2004, 05:29:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Seeker
So you're all for pædophilia if it comes from a position of authority?

Statutory rape and pædophilia aren't the same thing.

Mini D · « **Reply #86 on:** June 29, 2004, 07:40:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rabbidrabbit
it seems like a statute designed to make an "example" out of someone as opposed to fixing a problem.

I had a grand reply to this all typed out, but then figured I'd just let the lunacy of this speak for itself.

SLO · « **Reply #87 on:** June 29, 2004, 07:43:54 PM »

and you follow the speed limits too eh JAB.....

Laws to control Hormones.....too funny

you cannot control Mother Nature.....90% of teenagers would of banged that teacher....including me

the other 10% are too stupid like Laz or they are gay

30 years....talk about ridiculous

Mini D · « **Reply #88 on:** June 29, 2004, 08:04:33 PM »

Laws to control hormones? The teenager was not charged with a crime.

And where the hell are you guys getting "30 years"? From a "could receive up too...." sensationalistic quote in an article?

MiniD

Capt. Pork · « **Reply #89 on:** June 29, 2004, 08:09:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
Statutory rape and pædophilia aren't the same thing.

This is true, all though many people choose not to make the distinction.

Pedophelia involves sexual actions with a pre-pubescent child(a child whose sexual functions have not yet matured). You can argue it any way you want, but that's the clinical definition.

Statutory rape is what I would be guilty of if I tagged Hillary Duff.