I bet there have been enough experiments and studies of group dynamics to answer why people respond so differently to what I guess I’ll call the “weakling versus bully” phenomenon. Lots of folks have talked on these boards about how the community and HTC responded when the Rooks were in the hole a few years back, compared to when the Rooks have larger numbers today, and I have wondered the same thing. The three-Country setup we have made the two situations different in at least one major way.
When the Rooks were in the hole, and both the Knights and Bishops seemed to have parity, what I’ll call the “98-pound weakling” phenomenon occurred. Like the guy in the old Atlas ads, the Rooks got picked on and had sand kicked in their face a lot

. HTC made some minor game tweaks, but didn’t take any authoritative measures to try to address the situation. Some Knight and Bishop Squads felt sorry for the weakling and decided to help out on a temporary basis. And the Rooks themselves decided to sign-up for Charles Atlas’ body-building program to address their situation. In other words, the community policed itself and, over time, corrected the imbalance.
Now, currently, when the Rooks numbers swelled, and again the Knights and Bishops seemed to have parity, what I’ll call the “bully” phenomenon occurred. The Knights and Bishops were outraged that the bully was pushing everyone around, especially on Sunday nights. HTC took an authoritative stand to make some major game tweaks aimed at parity. There was not a large hue and cry from the Knights and Bishops to get more organized to fight the bully. And the Rooks themselves did little to try to correct the imbalance voluntarily. In other words, the community did little to police itself, albeit this was over a relatively short time period, and looked to the “man” to fix the problem.
Now I’m sure you can and will poke a million holes in and correct my analogy. I’m not saying either group is right or wrong, or either approach is correct or incorrect. My real question is, are there psychological studies of group reactions over time to weaklings and bullies that would help explain the different response that we have seen in the Aces High community around these two situations? It seems to me that society kind of laughs off the weaklings, feels sorry for them but by and large tells them to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and take care of themselves. On the other hand, society seems to react strongly to bullies, passes laws to protect us from them, and takes quick action to put them in their place.
Cya Up!
Dawg