Author Topic: Bush "Wait Until Charlie Get's Back With The Report" (Read 1615 times)

Sandman · « **Reply #30 on:** October 06, 2004, 10:43:29 PM »

It's the part about Iraq complying with the UN and the Gulf War was what forced them to do so.

They didn't comply. They were destroyed. IIRC, the coalition casualites numbered in the hundreds while the Iraqi losses are estimated at anything from 25,000 to 75,000.

Lizking · « **Reply #31 on:** October 06, 2004, 10:46:52 PM »

At least Sandman knows where the blame lies. If the Dems would just accept that fact, they might have a chance.

NUKE · « **Reply #32 on:** October 06, 2004, 10:49:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
It's the part about Iraq complying with the UN and the Gulf War was what forced them to do so.

They didn't comply. They were destroyed. IIRC, the coalition casualites numbered in the hundreds while the Iraqi losses are estimated at anything from 25,000 to 75,000.

lol.

What are you saying? Are you saying that Iraq suffered losses because they were FORCED to comply with UN resolutions? Isn't that all a part of the USE OF FORCE?

Without the use of force, nothing would have prevented Iraq from having WMD today. Tell me how I am wrong.

Sandman · « **Reply #33 on:** October 06, 2004, 10:51:23 PM »

Oh hell... if you go that route, would Iraq have had a chemical weapons program if the U.S. hadn't given it to them?

NUKE · « **Reply #34 on:** October 06, 2004, 10:55:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
Oh hell... if you go that route, would Iraq have had a chemical weapons program if the U.S. hadn't given it to them?

Christ you are a shifty devil!

The point ( remember the point) is that nothing but FORCE disarmed Iraq.

NUKE · « **Reply #35 on:** October 06, 2004, 10:56:42 PM »

I hate being part of a smack-down against you Sandman, but damn.

Sandman · « **Reply #36 on:** October 06, 2004, 10:58:15 PM »

Okay... so we've established that Iraq was disarmed after the Gulf War.

Where were you going with this?

Sandman · « **Reply #37 on:** October 06, 2004, 10:58:50 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by NUKE
I hate being part of a smack-down against you Sandman, but damn.

Premature jubiliation... first one to declare victory wins?

NUKE · « **Reply #38 on:** October 06, 2004, 11:07:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
Premature jubiliation... first one to declare victory wins?

more like, first one to go off topic refusing to address the specific pint ( many times) loses by default.

Sandman · « **Reply #39 on:** October 06, 2004, 11:08:51 PM »

I was on topic... I was just off on a tangent that you didn't like.

NUKE · « **Reply #40 on:** October 06, 2004, 11:11:53 PM »

Damn Sandy...screw arguing with you

Tell you what. I'm going to make a nice F-14 model for you.

Sandman · « **Reply #41 on:** October 06, 2004, 11:23:29 PM »

I love you man.

NUKE · « **Reply #42 on:** October 06, 2004, 11:26:05 PM »

well, I like you

But if you want a nice F-14, I'm your guy!

john9001 · « **Reply #43 on:** October 06, 2004, 11:27:39 PM »

<<< clip>>>.
Saddam was importing banned materials, working on unmanned aerial vehicles in violation of U.N. agreements and maintaining industrial capability that could be converted to produce weapons, officials have said. Duelfer also describes Saddam's Iraq as having had limited research efforts into chemical and biological weapons.
<<>>

Sandman · « **Reply #44 on:** October 06, 2004, 11:32:09 PM »

None of which made him an immediate threat.