Author Topic: I'm Gonna Vote Republican... (Read 1433 times)

Shuckins · « **on:** October 20, 2004, 09:25:09 PM »

...cause my wife SAID I could!

What's your excuse?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #1 on:** October 21, 2004, 07:15:25 AM »

My feelings of this election are the same choices I had in 2000...Dumb and Dumber. So, I will be voting for dumb, rather than dumber.

That said, I predict that if the Boston Red Sox win the world series, Kerry wins the election.

Shuckins · « **Reply #2 on:** October 21, 2004, 07:50:57 AM »

Yeah...but WHAT are the ODDS!?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #3 on:** October 21, 2004, 07:55:10 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Shuckins
Yeah...but WHAT are the ODDS!?

Kerry has the same shot at winning the election as Boston does the world series. One Houston advances, check out the latest line, that will be your answer

deSelys · « **Reply #4 on:** October 21, 2004, 07:57:07 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort
My feelings of this election are the same choices I had in 2000...Dumb and Dumber. So, I will be voting for dumb, rather than dumber.

That said, I predict that if the Boston Red Sox win the world series, Kerry wins the election.

Uuuuuuuhhhh? Weren't you praising you CiC a few month ago? Weren't you saying that going to war in Iraq was a bright move??

Now you're calling him 'Dumb'?? Flip-flop alert!

Note: I mostly agree with your last post (I would've said dumber and dumber) but I don't quite understand this radical change...

Or has your son cracked your BBS password?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #5 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:00:45 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by deSelys
Uuuuuuuhhhh? Weren't you praising you CiC a few month ago? Weren't you saying that going to war in Iraq was a bright move??

Now you're calling him 'Dumb'?? Flip-flop alert!

Note: I mostly agree with your last post (I would've said dumber and dumber) but I don't quite understand this radical change...

Or has your son cracked your BBS password?

You need to study my posts about Bush. My candidate was beat in the 2000 primaries, but you probably weren't around on the boards then.

Yes, I praise the CiC for going into Iraq, and if you do a search you'll see my displeasure for his failure to get a Gov't going there soon after invasion.

Do you homework son.

Bush is the best we have...even if he is screwing up, the Democraps we've had in the past, and current, would screw up, and screw US even worse.

And I still feel that going into Iraq and drawing every terrorist-wanna-be to the Middle East instead of the U.S as a brilliant move. No terrorist attacks on US soil since 9/11/2001. That is indeed brilliant.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #6 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:04:13 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort
No terrorist attacks on US soil since 9/11/2001. That is indeed brilliant.

That doesn't equate to the attacks being prevented.

DHS employees consider us lucky we haven't had another attack here.
-SW

Ripsnort · « **Reply #7 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:06:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
That doesn't equate to the attacks being prevented.

DHS employees consider us lucky we haven't had another attack here.
-SW

Facts are facts. Deal with it (or just blindly believe that luck has played a role in all of it) Your choice.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #8 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:07:49 AM »

You're right, I just stated a fact.

Of course, DHS employees don't know **** about our homeland... security...
-SW

deSelys · « **Reply #9 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:18:19 AM »

Ripsnort,

Do you really think that a terrorist network (like the one which caused 9/11) successfully set up and laying dormant in the US would have packed up and gone back to Iraq to shoot a couple of RPGs at M1 Abrams or to blow themselves up along with a couple of GIs when they could have done much worse on your soil?

No terrorist attacks since 9/11 has 3 possible causes IMO:

- there wasn't such a dormant network

- there isn't a dormant network anymore: the feds, NSA and CIA did their job and neutralized them

- they're there, waiting for a better opportunity to wreak havoc because they don't give a crap about Iraq...maybe because SH had nothing to do with AQ?

OTOH, US invasion turned Iraq into a recruiter's paradise for AQ & Co.

Bright move indeed...

And you'll excuse me for not having the time to study your 16k+ posts...RL got in the way

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #10 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:30:03 AM »

I hate how everyone calls it a competition of Dumb and Dumber.

George Bush has done really well. You might have said that in 2000, but now you have seen it, how can you keep saying it?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #11 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:38:27 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by deSelys

And you'll excuse me for not having the time to study your 16k+ posts...RL got in the way

I took the liberty and pulled a few up for you, but I could not find the one where I was severely critizing bush for his failure have a good plan to intall a gov't into Iraq sooner...

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort
First off, I've never been a Bush fan...I've stated time and time again on this BBS that "2000 election for choices sucked"

Second, Bush is ahelluva lot better choice than Gore and 3 times as good as Clinton (Clinton is just popular with your type because you're greedy, your 401k flourished under a rare technology boom, and the market has corrected itself)

Can you answer me this: What was Clintons legacy? What the hell did he DO for 8 years?

But I digress.

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=82065&referrerid=3203

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort

You'll find many of my posts saying that 2000 election was the year we held our nose going to the polls, yet you label people like I as bush lovers...never understood that, but then again, I don't have a full grasp on psychological conditions you live in daily..

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=89305&referrerid=3203

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort

Seems the US Gov't might be trying to pull a fast one?

Discuss...

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=79562&referrerid=3203

lazs2 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:38:31 AM »

I see it as either voting with the men or voting with the single women (married women tend to favor bush).

If you are not a woman or a colored person or flaming unhappy gay or a personal injury lawyer or a teacher... or are not afraid of firearms or Hot Rods...

you will man up and vote for Bush...

The taxi riding penny loafer apartment dwelling girlie men socialists will continue to vote for the democrats. It is the American way.

lazs

Ripsnort · « **Reply #13 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:43:43 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2

The taxi riding penny loafer apartment dwelling girlie men socialists will continue to vote for the democrats. It is the American way.

lazs

Those are known as "Metrosexuals" today Lazs.

lazs2 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 21, 2004, 08:48:01 AM »

yer ****tin me rip? that is what a metrosexual is? sheesh... them "progressive" kerrie voters got no shame whatsoever do they?

"metrosexual" damn thats funny! we don't hear that one around here much... even at the starbucks.

lazs