Author Topic: Bill Clinton as UN Secretary General? (Read 1552 times)

-tronski- · « **Reply #15 on:** October 23, 2004, 03:19:16 AM »

I always thought Bill was alright, he'd make a good UN secretary general

Tronsky

Fishu · « **Reply #16 on:** October 23, 2004, 03:49:35 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
I know yiu hate america, but do you hate it so much that you support genocides that america intervend in and stopped?

Yea whatever... why bother even reply to you, when the first card you pull out is "america hater".
I don't either know why you go on about Kosovo, when I didn't say a word about it.

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #17 on:** October 23, 2004, 04:00:14 AM »

Fishu your post certainly reads like you are criticising US intervention in Bosnia & Kosovo.

Fishu · « **Reply #18 on:** October 23, 2004, 04:25:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by FUNKED1
Fishu your post certainly reads like you are criticising US intervention in Bosnia & Kosovo.

Well, I can say it wasn't about it...
More like the Iraq issue, which seems to have multiplied the whine of UN being too passive.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #19 on:** October 23, 2004, 04:29:11 AM »

Well I never said anything about Iraq.. Do you just wanna attack me then, is that it?

Anyway, lets clear this up.

Do you support the US intervention in Bosnia and Kosovo?

Fishu · « **Reply #20 on:** October 23, 2004, 04:38:53 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Well I never said anything about Iraq.. Do you just wanna attack me then, is that it?

Anyway, lets clear this up.

Do you support the US intervention in Bosnia and Kosovo?

Yes, there was proofs of severe human right violations and the US intervened with a valid reason.
Along with the UN mandate as far as I remember.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #21 on:** October 23, 2004, 04:43:20 AM »

Kosovo was not UN approved, and no large genocide had taken place yet but we thought one was starting based on Miloshevich's past record. We acted on account of that and his violations of previous cease fire agreements - all without the UN.

How do yiu feel about that?

Fishu · « **Reply #22 on:** October 23, 2004, 05:48:01 AM »

Still as above.
However US didn't participate much after the 'war' as I recall.
That was the big whine back then I think.. wasn't it?

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #23 on:** October 23, 2004, 05:54:32 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Fishu
Still as above.
However US didn't participate much after the 'war' as I recall.
That was the big whine back then I think.. wasn't it?

Which above?

The above where the USA is evil for going without UN?

Or the above where the USA is not evil for going without the UN?

And what does "after" have to do with anything? There are plenty of US troops in Bosnia for almost 10 years now. They are in Kosovo too... Also why even criticze the USA for its levels of peakekeeping, we likely did most of the airstrikes, most of the organazing and of course handled the Bosnia peace talks in Dayton Ohio USA.. Isnt that enough? Maybe the european forces should put in more... Should the USA both fight the most and do the most peacekeeping to clean up that european mess? Is that what you want? Where is europes responsibility?

Maverick · « **Reply #24 on:** October 23, 2004, 07:56:12 AM »

clintoon would fit the job just fine. He has already shown he has no scruples with ethics,or honesty and certainly has shown a disposition for being serviced under the table. As far as I know being a felon does not keep one from being the pres. of the UN.

lazs2 · « **Reply #25 on:** October 23, 2004, 10:29:22 AM »

mav... I am starting to really enjoy your posts. not that that matters... just saying...

lazs

Toad · « **Reply #26 on:** October 23, 2004, 10:30:47 AM »

I doubt the UN membership is going to let an American lead the organziation. Any American.

Sandman · « **Reply #27 on:** October 23, 2004, 10:34:01 AM »

Toad has it.

john9001 · « **Reply #28 on:** October 23, 2004, 11:26:35 AM »

a american puppet as head of the UN? yourup would never stand for it.

Reschke · « **Reply #29 on:** October 23, 2004, 01:23:32 PM »

Well at least then he would have his chance to bang a woman from every country in the world. I mean come on isn't that what Clinton was all about in office...trying to get a woman from every state in the union.