First time marijuana seller gets 55 years

[Suave]

If I may shed some light on Airheads ghastly allusion. Dildos are illegal in texas, because they are three dimensional depictions of parts of the human body that are clearly evil.

[RedTop]

Me to. To many lawmakers that would not pass a test if given.

[RedTop]

Originally posted by Airhead
Well, I don't live in some back asswards state like Utah or Texas Drunky, so I'm beyond the reach of your frontier justice. In fact where I live what he did wouldn't even get a parking ticket....and that's if we'd tolorate undercover cops busting people from dime bags, which we don't. We send them after crank labs.

Rot in Texas, Rot in Texas... I smoke pot through my dildo. In Texas that'd be double life.

where are ya from again?

[TweetyBird]

>>I dont really care if people get stoned or not so long as they dont try to rob me or car jack me and kidnap/rape my children.

<<

Or drive while they are stoned ( i don't care if they're stoned on Budweiser or crack).  We have enough laws in this country governing how people can interact with others. We just don't enforce them.  This stupidity that JackDaniels is legal but pot isn't is nothing but money in the pockets of politicians.

[Airhead]

Originally posted by RedTop
where are ya from again?

Mendocino County, California. Cultivation of 25 plants is legal, posession of 2 pounds is legal, with a Dr.'s note and a resigstration card from the County.

We're allowed to own dildos, too.

[RedTop]

But without that "Dr. Note" is it still leagle to have 25 plants or 2 pounds? What is the limits? Can ya have a gun when your smoking a joint?

[Drunky]

Originally posted by Airhead
I smoke pot through my dildo. In Texas that'd be double life.

Hahahah, not only is that disgusting, it's ****ING ILLEGAL.  GO DIRECTLY TO JAIL YOU LAWLESS FELON, YOU.

I will have you know that the Supreme Court has been arguing and decided that national dildo laws override individual state laws concerning dildos, you ****ing law breaker.

As I type this I'm pulling an Udie and calling the FBI to report you for unlawfull dildo use.

Rot in Cali, rot in Cali with all your crank lab makers.

Hahaha, the water is blue.  I say again the water is blue.

Copy, the water is blue.  The owl is in the watchtower.  I say again, the owl is in the watchtower.

Watch for the blackhelicopters Airhead.  The hippie has already turned you in for your recycled paper scam and now I've called 'them' also.

Goodbye my friend.  Enjoy the inside of a 0.00189 mile by 0.00198 mile concrete room, you illegal didlo user.

[lazs2]

suave... I admit to be a constitutionalist but not a liberal.  I am against making some felonies like "hate crimes" or drug crimes have any special treatment.  I am not against increassed penalties in felonies where a gun actualy is part of the crime. drug, theft or otherwise.... violent felonies are an even more serious matter.

no crime tho that simply has involves a firearm but causes no injury should be equal in sentancing to any crime that involves grave injury or death.   but then... I think most of those sentances are  too light.


lazs

[Drunky]

Originally posted by RedTop
But without that "Dr. Note" is it still LEAGLE to have 25 plants or 2 pounds? What is the limits? Can ya have a gun when your smoking a joint?

Actually, I'm not sure what is 'leagle' these days.

[Martlet]

He broke the law.  Let him rot in jail.  I hope they take him to clean up the highway.

[TweetyBird]

Bush broke the law and he's president (our first President with a criminal record). Go figure.

Taking politics out of it, do you think we have an aristocracy problem (i.e., its not what you know but WHO you know)?

[Yeager]

Angelos wore a small pistol in an ankle holster when he sold the
marijuana.
====
Thats all I needed to know.

poor bastard should have dropped the pistol, married a studmuffin and mover to canada.  He would have had it made in the shade.

[jEEZY]

The very issue of minimum mandatorys is before the Supreme Court--blakley v. washington is the case being reconsidered.

It has caused havoc in the federal courts.

[Suave]

Originally posted by lazs2
suave... I admit to be a constitutionalist but not a liberal.  I am against making some felonies like "hate crimes" or drug crimes have any special treatment.  I am not against increassed penalties in felonies where a gun actualy is part of the crime. drug, theft or otherwise.... violent felonies are an even more serious matter.

no crime tho that simply has involves a firearm but causes no injury should be equal in sentancing to any crime that involves grave injury or death.   but then... I think most of those sentances are  too light.

lazs

Allow me to introduce my friend. Sarcasm, meet Lazs. Lazs, Sarcasm.

[TweetyBird]

I'm thinking about criminal arguments.

Take for example someone who loads a 2 1/2 ton automobile with a drunk driver. He thinks, heck I'm just going home and don't drive fast. I'm not going to kill anyone, I just don't feel like walking or waiting for a cab.

Or perhaps a guy that sells stuff more to feed his own drug use than to make a profit. He thinks, I'm gonna carry a gun for personal safety from insane drugggies with no money. I'm not going to kill anyone, just protectect myself.

Or even a CEO who gets a file containing evidence of vascular abnomalities related to a drug his company produces. He's thinks, these studies must be wrong. I'll thry to get the scientist to shut up and try to look into it more.

All drugs. One guy becomes President, one guy's stock plummets, and one guy gets 55 years. We have an aristocracy problem, not a drug problem. I'd guess there will never be a war on aristocracy.